Attacking and Defending Nation States.
Advanced persistent threat (APT) usually refers to a group, such as a foreign government, with both the capability and the intent to persistently and effectively target a specific entity. The term is commonly used to refer to cyber threats, in particular that of Internet-enabled espionage, but applies equally to other threats such as that of traditional espionage or attack
3xban wrote:If a proper NAC is in place, then a physical breach will hopefully be pointless, or at least pose to great a risk to bother. The more systems they have to circumvent, the more noise they will make and the faster the SOC will catch on.
3xban wrote:Now if you were to target say a customer or sub-contractor of the company and compromise their network through weak Wi-Fi, then you may have a better chance. Dependent on the sensitivity of the data these companies have, you still may fall prey to the parent company's security measures.
jinwald12 wrote:sil, to be honest that has little to do with the OP other then the fact that it makes more sense to go physical if there are NATs making external attacks more dificult and with the lack of static IPs some networks use a client system's hostname as a sub domain i don't know why but it does happen so you can find targets that way and static IPed systems such as DNS servers or FTP servers are often vulnerable targets.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest