Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 41 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Columnsarrow Editor-In-Chiefarrow [Article]-CASP – The Evolution of Technical Security Certifications?
EH-Net
May 23, 2013, 03:58:30 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [Article]-CASP – The Evolution of Technical Security Certifications?  (Read 9633 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 4167


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: November 27, 2011, 01:05:37 AM »

A few questions have popped up on EH-Net regarding this new cert from CompTIA. So I figured that I would get a jump on things and start the conversation with the source. If you have any other questions, please ask in this forum, and we'll get Carol to answer directly. Hope it helps.

Permanent link: [Article]-CASP – The Evolution of Technical Security Certifications?

Quote



CompTIA has been a stalwart in the IT certification arena for quite a number of years. They have dominated the space with such recognized credentials as A+, Linux+, Security+ and many others. Their certifications have been highly recommended by The Ethical Hacker Network (EH-Net) as well as countless others as an entry-point into a given area of IT. But can CompTIA help advance the careers of those already in the field of their choice within IT?

Enter CompTIA’s newest line of industry credentials, the Mastery Series of Certifications. The first offering from this new line is the CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner, CASP (pronounced C-A-S-P like an acronym as opposed to ‘casp’ like a word). At first glance, it would appear as though CompTIA is taking on ISC2 and the venerable CISSP. After a closer look, this isn’t quite the case. Let’s find out more from Carol Balkcom, CompTIA’s Director and Product Manager for the CASP.


Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
YuckTheFankees
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 324


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2011, 01:15:55 PM »

How do you guys feel about this cert? Do you think it will become an up and coming cert?
Logged

OSCP in progress
Joshsevo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 278


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2011, 09:17:15 AM »

It could be.  Depends on what it's based off of.  The A+ cert is probably the most widly known.

What are the requirements for it?
Logged

Security+, Network+, C|EH, CHFI, CPT
tturner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 432


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 29, 2011, 09:05:18 AM »

I'm extremely skeptical that this will go anywhere. If they achieve 8570 status then certainly many DOD folks will see this as a relatively inexpensive option, but other than that I have little faith in their ability to deliver a quality product. I've been a CompTIA cert holder since 1999 and have never been very impressed with their programs. They have a reputation as an entry level cert company and that's what they do. Trying to escape that will be an uphill battle. I sincerely hope I am mistaken.
Logged

Certifications:
CISSP, CISA, GPEN, GWAPT, GAWN, GCIA, GCIH, GSEC, OPSE, CSWAE, CSTP, VCP

WIP: OSWP, GSSP-JAVA, GXPN

Udacity on hold, again. I suck.

http://sentinel24.com/blog  @tonylturner http://bsidesorlando.org
l33t5h@rk
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2011, 11:45:58 PM »

I've been a CompTIA cert holder since 1999 and have never been very impressed with their programs.

I hate to sound negative because it does look like they're exploring expansion of their current space, but I recently interviewed for a position on my team and two of the candidates who were brought in had A+, Sec+, and Network+, yet were extremely unqualified. Perhaps it's just a caveat emptor for certifications altogether, but if someone has those and can't explain the OSI model (as I always ask in interviews) then clearly a goal has been missed. Perhaps prereqs should be higher?
Logged
tturner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 432


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2011, 08:41:22 AM »

Net+ covers OSI model and asks questions about it so it's not necessarily a cert fail, but more an applicant fail. Just like anything else, if you are not using skills you will lose them. That being said, I find many unqualified applicants holding these certs because they are commonly delivered as part of tech school degree programs and the tests are really easy to braindump. Which may be a cert fail as well. At one tech school I attended in the late 90's, one student was charging other students to take their MCSE and CompTIA certs for them and sharing profits with the proctor. There was a camera in the testing room but everyone knew it did not work.

I for one am looking forward to the industry getting away from multiple guess and focusing on practical exams. I hope we get there one day because the current certification models are a complete failure.
Logged

Certifications:
CISSP, CISA, GPEN, GWAPT, GAWN, GCIA, GCIH, GSEC, OPSE, CSWAE, CSTP, VCP

WIP: OSWP, GSSP-JAVA, GXPN

Udacity on hold, again. I suck.

http://sentinel24.com/blog  @tonylturner http://bsidesorlando.org
3xban
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 608


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 02, 2011, 08:55:28 AM »

I guy I worked with had a bunch of certs after his name and was going for his MBA.  But when it came to actually doing the work he fell short.  He either didn't share what he was doing or couldn't explain it.  I once asked him how his IIS 7 was since I had to rebuild a web server and migrate the old site pages off a recovered drive.  His answer was "what do you mean?"  So I repeated, and he came back with well "I have my MCSE so I know it."  I didn't get much help from him on the matter.  Not to mention it took him 3 days to set up watchguard SOHO devices.  Not 3 days total for all devices, but 3 days PER device.  Apparently he didn't realize you can dump the config files from a completed one and pump it down to new devices...  but I digress...

Yes people can have the cert and not know a damn thing about the material.  They knew enough to memorize the answers.  Wow though really?  OSI?  its like in every tech book out there no matter what the topic is!
Logged

Certs: GCWN
(@)Dewser
l33t5h@rk
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 02, 2011, 10:53:45 AM »

I always ask about OSI model in the interview. It just seems like a good way to find a starting place. I don't even necessarily expect people to dig deep, just tell me 7 layers and name them. Once you start discussing TCP/IP and packet structure in depth that is more what I'm interested in than the theory.

tturner - I agree with you on the applicant fail, but it should be both ways. How did this person get the cert? Exactly how you described, paper mill studying got the rubber stamp and now his resume has every CompTIA cert on it.

3xban - I am still LOL about the 3 days per SOHO, you could take one apart, put it back together, and configure it in 2 hours!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.072 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.