Home
Calendar
Certifications
Columns
Features
Forum
Resources
Vitals
Latest Additions
April 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - eLearnSecurity
Human Intelligence to Navigate the Security Data Deluge
February 2013 Free Giveaway Winner of SANS CyberCon Training
Interview: Bugcrowd Founders on Herding Ninjas for Crowdsourced Bug Bounties
Network Forensics: The Tree in the Forest
March 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - Mile2
Book Review: Violent Python
February 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - SANS
Holiday 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of Metasploit Pro by Rapid7
Course Review: SANS FOR408 Computer Forensic Investigations – Windows In-Depth
The Security Consulting Sugar High
Tutorial: Fun with SMB on the Command Line
Interview: Ilia Kolochenko, CEO of High-Tech Bridge
October 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of LearningGate Training
The Broken: Assessing Corporate Security in 2012 to Make a Better 2013
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Lost Password?
No account yet?
Register
Who's Online
We have 31 guests and 1 member online
You are here:
Home
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
Network Pen Testing
Windows Vs Linux tools help
EH-Net
May 26, 2013, 12:55:13 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine
Home Page
Home
Help
Calendar
Login
Register
EH-Net
>
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
>
Network Pen Testing
(Moderator:
don
) >
Windows Vs Linux tools help
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Windows Vs Linux tools help (Read 6714 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
millwalll
Guest
Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
on:
September 20, 2011, 05:53:08 AM »
Hi all,
I just wanted some advice when pen testing a windows boxes is it better to use a windows platform ? or is Linux still the best platform to use regardless of the box ? If so what would you say are must have tools for windows ?
thanks
Logged
cd1zz
Recruiters
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 561
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #1 on:
September 20, 2011, 07:54:56 AM »
Whatever tool you need to use to get the job done!
I prefer a Linux box just because there are so many tools at your disposal and for example, backtrack has them all organized and setup for you. There are certain tools however that only run under windows like Cain & Able so you should probably have both OS's ready to go just in case...
Logged
OSCE | OSCP | GXPN | OSWP | CISSP
http://www.pwnag3.com
http://www.networkadminsecrets.com
3xban
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 608
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #2 on:
September 20, 2011, 09:26:25 AM »
I agree with cd1zz. With virtualization you can easily have both OSes to use. The last company I was at, we had a pen test being down by an outside firm and the tester was using a Mac, running Windows and Linux. Using Windows to dump hashes from other Windows systems etc... Just like testing malware, you need a Windows system as a victim machine as well as a linux system for further analysis.
Logged
Certs: GCWN
(@)Dewser
millwalll
Guest
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #3 on:
September 20, 2011, 10:07:53 AM »
Agreed but my question is more as in what tools are there for windows ? its it worth having JTR install both windows and linux box ? same with all other common tools like nessus,metasploit and so on....
Logged
cd1zz
Recruiters
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 561
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #4 on:
September 20, 2011, 10:14:59 AM »
Metasploit, nessus, nmap and a number of other tools can be run on both operating systems but you're really not gaining any advantages by having both. For example JTR is going to crack a password hash the same way it would on Linux, and you'll get the same result. See my point?
Just run whatever OS you're more comfortable with. If that is Windows, you might encounter tools that are only developed for Linux which is why I'd probably recommend you just try to do everything on Linux. Seems easier that way to me!
Logged
OSCE | OSCP | GXPN | OSWP | CISSP
http://www.pwnag3.com
http://www.networkadminsecrets.com
millwalll
Guest
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #5 on:
September 21, 2011, 03:33:56 AM »
Well at the moment I am using linux with virtual box windows box the reason I have both is just encase I need to use cain but just wanted to know if there are any tools that are must have for windows.
Logged
TheXero
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 112
Try Harder!
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #6 on:
September 21, 2011, 04:30:40 AM »
In the OffSec pwb/oscp they only time you really use Windows is while creating an exploit for a Windows machine.
I use Linux based machines as my primary OS and only have Windows virtual machines for "target practice" and developing exploits.
In terms of tools, jtr does work on Windows, however from a performance stand point you'd be much better of running it on Linux, maybe you should do a comparison on 2 vm's with the same spec, one running windows and one running Ubuntu or something like that.
~TheXero
Logged
OSCP | OSWP
www.thexero.co.uk
millwalll
Guest
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #7 on:
September 21, 2011, 12:14:46 PM »
Cool I prefer to use linux I just was not sure if when attacking windows boxes it was better to use a windows box or if a windows box was better at performing certain task other than link box.
Logged
rance
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 212
<censored>
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #8 on:
September 22, 2011, 11:28:41 AM »
As cd1zz, what it takes to get the job done. As an example, I prefer to use linux for my pen testing (SamuraiWTF), however, I'm currently in an engagement where the web app utilizes AcitveX (hurl). So, I'm forced to use a windows based toolset since I'm forced to use IE to be able to fully access all content.
I say it's best to be prepared for any environment. As mentioned, VM's are a great way to go.
Logged
Poking at security since 1986. +++ATH
eth3real
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 309
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #9 on:
September 22, 2011, 11:41:44 AM »
I agree, your main host should be whatever your preference is, and then virtual machines for everything else. Or you could dual boot, it doesn't really matter, but that would prevent you from being able to run tools from multiple operating systems at the same time.
Also, if you're doing frugal installs of pen-testing suites (like BackTrack or Samurai), I would recommend only running them in Virtual Machines, as these can usually be rooted more easily.
Logged
Put that in your pipe and grep it!
MaXe
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 669
I've just upgraded myself to a cyborg muahahaa!!1
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #10 on:
September 22, 2011, 02:45:41 PM »
I recommend Linux as a main penetration testing toolbox, and then Windows for tools that only runs on Windows, or for that sake runs the most fast. (Nessus, NeXpose, Immunity Canvas, Core Impact, and so forth. All the automated tools that you can use to
assist
you in your pentests.)
Using automated tools alone, does not make anyone a real pentester in my humble opinion
Anyway, often I might have to install a tool, craft a packet, use a raw socket, etc. Linux can easily do this and it's often also faster to do all of these as well.
Install a tool: apt-get install toolname (if it's in the repositories of course)
Craft a packet: Just use ScaPy, it's quite effective compared to you can pretty much create any kind of packet and still have a nice overview.
Use a raw socket: No need to install custom libraries like Winpcap.
For tools, you can pretty much just download BackTrack from
www.backtrack-linux.org
and you'll have 90-99% of all the tools you will ever need. (Besides those you might have to write yourself.)
Logged
I'm an InterN0T'er
sil
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 549
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #11 on:
September 22, 2011, 03:06:13 PM »
Quote from: MaXe on September 22, 2011, 02:45:41 PM
Using automated tools alone, does not make anyone a real pentester in my humble opinion
For tools, you can pretty much just download BackTrack from
www.backtrack-linux.org
and you'll have 90-99% of all the tools you will ever need. (Besides those you might have to write yourself.)
That in itself (BT) is nothing more than a tool. Although from time to time I plop open a BT machine, I almost ALWAYS perform testing on anything I can get my hands on. FreeBSD, Solaris, NetBSD, OpenBSD, DragonFly, other versions of Linux. I don't really care for any particular OS as it is only a tool.
In doing so, you get used to whatever is available on the operating system without having to rely on ANY tool including Scapy for packet play. Imagine you getting into a Solaris ONLY network without Python what would you do without Scapy? Install Python to get scapy running? I wouldn't, I would try hping, harpoon or tcpreplay which have less dependencies, and HIDS isn't going to see the glaring python install. On BSD I might use bittwist or hexinject, all depends on what I'm doing.
Personally, I would fiddle with ALL operating systems to become as versatile as possible and try mimicking available security tools with normal system available tools. E.g. if using say FreeBSD, you'd want to focus on ports in the net tree (
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/categories-grouped.html
) and familiarize yourself with them. You'd be surprised to find you can perform the same functions as ANY SECURITY TOOL with standard systems tools. You have to know what's available and what's not.
So while some may tout the "this OS" or "this tool" I say, focus on the system rather than the tool. BT is also nothing more than a tool. If you become too comfortable with it and the tools on it, you're not doing yourself any justice and you are no more a pentester than anyone else firing off tools.
MaXe, this isn't aimed at you at all. Just stating the obvious, there isn't any "one size fits all." I would love to see how many pentesters would be able to make do with just the system tools. NOT being able to download, install run whatever favorites they have. When one can do this with most systems, then one should pat themselves on the back period.
I've said it before: imagine being contracted to pentest a "contained" environment without being able to use whatever tools or operating system of your choice. What could you do? What could you do for recon on say a Windows XP machine with no nmap, wireshark, etc.? How would you enumerate the network? Same goes for Linux, BSD, etc., especially BT. When you feel confident on any system without tools, you can best believe the tool of choice would be whatever is available to you. NOT what you favorite.
Logged
http://www.infiltrated.net/mgz/puppylecter.jpg
MaXe
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 669
I've just upgraded myself to a cyborg muahahaa!!1
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #12 on:
September 22, 2011, 03:24:00 PM »
Quote from: sil on September 22, 2011, 03:06:13 PM
MaXe, this isn't aimed at you at all. Just stating the obvious, there isn't any "one size fits all." I would love to see how many pentesters would be able to make do with just the system tools. NOT being able to download, install run whatever favorites they have. When one can do this with most systems, then one should pat themselves on the back period.
I've said it before: imagine being contracted to pentest a "contained" environment without being able to use whatever tools or operating system of your choice. What could you do? What could you do for recon on say a Windows XP machine with no nmap, wireshark, etc.? How would you enumerate the network? Same goes for Linux, BSD, etc., especially BT. When you feel confident on any system without tools, you can best believe the tool of choice would be whatever is available to you. NOT what you favorite.
It's cool, actually I am just stating what beginners should learn about first
Being comfortable in any or almost any environment takes time. For example, with web application security often all I require is a browser that is able to view the source code of a website. I can do with telnet or netcat too, or a scripting language, but it will slow me down.
Often I just get FireFox and find a random cookie editor when I'm tired of manually editing the cookies, and of course a transparent proxy or an addon performing the same function. Web application security is of course only a small part of penetration testing, but if I had to I could probably even cope with using lynx or links only too xD
Recently I was testing a custom environment where I couldn't install any tools, and the only scripting language installed locally on the machine was perl, so I had to just go with that even though I never really used perl but thankfully most of the stuff I had to do wasn't that hard. (gcc, cc, g++, python, and all those other tools were not installed and was not possible to be installed either, so I just looked for scripting languages installed instead in that case hehe)
I get your point of course, and I admire that you're able to be comfortable in so many environments as not even I am that. Of course I can always do my best, and use Google to the best extent possible, but in my case I'm mostly familiar with using Linux (a few different variants) and Windows.
Scapy was also just an example, as I know you could probably do with hping too
It was nice reading your feedback though
Logged
I'm an InterN0T'er
3xban
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 608
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #13 on:
September 23, 2011, 08:51:29 AM »
Awesome point Sil. hmm, I actually got to feel the bite of not having any tools available. I recently started a new job (2 months now) in a very large enterprise. The last place I was at was small, only a few hundred users and 100 servers 50% VM. I had the keys to the kingdom there being the Security Admin as well as having a good amount of knowledge on the other areas in our support group. Now I am in something that dwarfs my last job. 14K users, almost 1000 servers and many restrictions placed on the workstations. So no keys, limited access to some log data and it took 2 months to get local admin so I can start installing some tools like nmap. So for the 2 months I had to make due with what I had to investigate systems. nslookup, ping, tracert, netstat etc...
Its kinda fun to poke around using only what you have.
Logged
Certs: GCWN
(@)Dewser
rance
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 212
<censored>
Re: Windows Vs Linux tools help
«
Reply #14 on:
September 23, 2011, 09:48:57 AM »
3xban, I feel your pain. I'm at a fortune 500, and the hoop-jumping is mind boggling.
Logged
Poking at security since 1986. +++ATH
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
EH-Net
-----------------------------
=> Calendar Of Events
===> ChicagoCon 2007
===> ChicagoCon 2008s
===> ChicagoCon 2008f
===> ChicagoCon 2009s
=> Ethical Hacktivism
=> News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
===> Greetings
=> Special Events
-----------------------------
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
-----------------------------
=> General Certification
===> Networking
===> OS
===> Security
=> Compliance, Regulations & Standards
=> Control Systems
=> Cyber Warfare
=> Forensics
===> CCE / MCCE - (Master) Certified Computer Examiner
===> CHFI - Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator
===> EnCE - EnCase® Certified Examiner
===> GCFA - GIAC Certified Forensics Analyst
=> Hardware
=> Incident Response
===> CSIH - Computer Security Incident Handler
===> GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
=> Malware
===> Advisories
=> Mobile
=> Network Pen Testing
===> CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker
===> CPTC - Certified Penetration Testing Consultant
===> CPTE - Certified Penetration Testing Engineer
===> CSTA - Certified Security Testing Associate
===> eCPPT - eLearnSecurity Certified Professional Penetration Tester
===> ECSA - EC-Council Certified Security Analyst
===> GPEN - GIAC Certified Penetration Tester
===> OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
=> Physical Security
=> Programming
=> Social Engineering
=> Web Applications
=> Wireless
===> CWNP Certs
===> GAWN - GIAC Assessing Wireless Networks
===> OSWP - Offensive Security Wireless Professional
=> Other
-----------------------------
Columns
-----------------------------
=> Editor-In-Chief
=> Andress
=> Gates
=> Haddix
=> Hadnagy
=> Heffner
=> Hoffman
=> Linn
=> RichM
=> Murray
=> J. Peltier
=> Weidman
=> Wilson
-----------------------------
Features
-----------------------------
=> /root
=> Book Reviews
=> Opinions
=> Skillz
===> Examples
===> May 06 - Star Hacks, Episode V: The Empire Hacks Back
===> July 06 - Hack Bill!
===> Sept 06 - Netcat in the Hat
===> Nov 06 - Hitch-Hackers Guide to the Galaxy
===> Dec 06 - A Christmas (Hacking) Story
===> Feb 07 - Charlottes Web Site
===> April 07 - Microsoft Office Space
===> June 07 - Serenity Hack
===> Oct 07 - Worst. Ethical. Hacker. Challenge. Ever.
===> Dec 07 - Frosty the Snow Crash
===> March 2008 - It Happened One Friday
===> Oct 2008 - Scooby Doo and the Crypto Caper
===> Dec 08 - Santa Claus Is Hacking to Town
===> Feb 2009 - Brady Bunch Boondoggle
===> July 2009 - Prison Break
===> October 2009 - SSHliders
===> December 2009 - Miracle on Thirty-Hack Street
===> December 2010 - The Nightmare Before Charlie Browns Christmas
-----------------------------
Resources
-----------------------------
=> Career Central
===> Looking For Work
===> Looking To Hire
=> Links to cool sites.
=> Mass Media
=> News from the Outside World
=> Tools
=> Tutorials
===> Tutorial Requests
Loading...
Exclusive Deal
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22
5% Off
w/ Code
:
EHN_5
SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF
Any
SANS Course
in Any Format!
Coupon Code:
EHN_5
Including
SANS Rocky Mountain 2013
&
SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
Great!
Better.
About the same.
Little worse.
FUBAR!
Recent Forum Topics
OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
: Failed my first attempt at the OSCP exam
(95) by
zeebee
News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
: Change is Coming to EH-Net!!
(30) by
don
Tools
: Symbolic Exploit Assistant project is looking for collaborators
(0) by
galapag0
Greetings
: Hi from the UK
(5) by
prats84
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: Passed my GCIH
(9) by
prats84
Network Pen Testing
: Want a challenge? Want a GXPN practice exam?
(0) by
ajohnson
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: GCIH Free Practice test attempt
(1) by
prats84
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
Privacy Notice
for TDCC & All Properties
© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla!
is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.