Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 55 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Resourcesarrow Mass Mediaarrow HBO Documentary: Hacking Democracy
EH-Net
May 24, 2013, 10:01:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: HBO Documentary: Hacking Democracy  (Read 6124 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4168


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: November 02, 2006, 07:58:18 PM »

Debuting tonight on HBO, this cautionary documentary exposes the vulnerability of computers - which count approximately 80% of America's votes in county, state and federal elections - suggesting that if our votes aren't safe, then our democracy isn't safe either. This presentation is set to play numerous times after its debut.

Quote
Electronic voting machines count about 87% of the votes cast in America today. But are they reliable? Are they safe from tampering? From a current congressional hearing to persistent media reports that suggest misuse of data and even outright fraud, concerns over the integrity of electronic voting are growing by the day. And if the voting process is not secure, neither is America's democracy. The timely, cautionary documentary HACKING DEMOCRACY exposes gaping holes in the security of America's electronic voting system.

In the 2000 presidential election, an electronic voting machine recorded minus 16,022 votes for Al Gore in Volusia County, Fla. While fraud was never proven, the faulty tally alerted computer scientists, politicians and everyday citizens to the very real possibility of computer hacking during elections.

In 2002, Seattle grandmother and writer Bev Harris asked officials in her county why they had acquired electronic touch screen systems for their elections. Unsatisfied with their explanation, she set out to learn about electronic voting machines on her own. In the course of her research, which unearthed hundreds of reported incidents of mishandled voting information, Harris stumbled across an "online library" of the Diebold Corporation, discovering a treasure trove of information about the inner-workings of the company's voting system.

Harris brought this proprietary "secret" information to computer security expert Dr. Avi Rubin of Johns Hopkins University, who determined that the software lacked the necessary security features to prevent tampering. Her subsequent investigation took her from the trash cans of Texas to the secretary of state of California and finally to Florida, where a "mini-election" to test the vulnerability of the memory cards used in electronic voting produced alarming results.

As the scope of her mission grew, Harris drew on the expertise of other computer- science experts, politicians and activists, among them: Andy Stephenson, candidate for secretary of state in Washington state; Susan Bernecker, Republican candidate in New Orleans; Kathleen Wynne, an activist from Cleveland; Dr. Herbert Thompson, chief security strategist, Security Innovation, Inc.; Ion Sancho, supervisor of elections for Leon County, Fla.; and Harri Hursti, a computer-security analyst. Academics, public officials and others seen in interview footage include: Deanie Lowe, supervisor of elections, Volusia County, Fla.; Mark Radke, marketing director of Diebold; David Cobb, presidential candidate, Green Party; and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs-Jones of Ohio.

Diebold software, or other software like it, is installed in thousands of counties across 32 states. David Dill, professor of computer science at Stanford, says the problem is that there are "lots of people involved in writing the software, and lots of people who could have touched the software before it went into that machine. If one of those people put something malicious in the software and it's distributed to all the machines, then that one person could be responsible for changing tens of thousands of votes, maybe even hundreds of thousands, across the country."

In Florida, Leon County supervisor of elections Ion Sancho presided over a trial "mini-election" to see if the vote could be hacked without being detected. Before votes were actually cast, computer analyst Harri Hursti "stuffed the ballot box" by entering votes on the computer's memory card. Then, after votes were cast, the results displayed when the same memory card was entered in the central tabulating program indicated that fraud was indeed possible. In other words, by accessing a memory card before an election, someone could change the results - a claim Diebold had denied was possible.

Ultimately, Bev Harris' research proved that the top-secret computerized systems counting the votes in America's public elections are not only fallible, but also vulnerable to undetectable hacking, from local school board contests to the presidential race. With the electronic voting machines of three companies - Diebold, ES&S and Sequoia - collectively responsible for around 80 percent of America's votes today, the stakes for democracy are high.

One of the executive producers of HACKING DEMOCRACY is Sarah Teale, whose previous HBO credits include "Dealing Dogs" and "Bellevue: Inside Out."

HACKING DEMOCRACY was directed by Simon Ardizzone and Russell Michaels; produced by Simon Ardizzone, Robert Carrillo Cohen and Russell Michaels; executive producers, Earl Katz, Sarah Teale and Sian Edwards; edited by Sasha Zik. For HBO: supervising producer, John Hoffman; executive producer, Sheila Nevins.

http://www.hbo.com/docs/programs/hackingdemocracy/?ntrack_para1=feat_main_title

Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
oleDB
Recruiters
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 236



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2006, 11:43:04 AM »

That election fraud stuff is extremely scary and I'm really frustrated by the government and Diebold's stances. Transparency and complete oversight and accountability is a must for voting, but somehow they just don't get it. If this isn't a first step towards big brotherdom, I don't know what is. The sad, thing is that election fraud in paper voting, still isn't policed hard enough either, because we have dead people voting in some states.
Logged
mn_kthompson
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 58



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2006, 02:41:53 PM »

I don't understand why electronic voting is so difficult.  This should be an open source project funded by the federal government.  That way there would be widespread faith that there wasn't any trickery in the code.  That takes care of the code.

The same government agency should also come up with specifications so that MULTIPLE companies or non-profit agencies can develop certified machines to run the open source code.  No proprietary stuff, or non-standard implementations, it has to match the specifications perfectly.  That takes care of the hardware.

Election observers would need to be trained in how to load the open source code onto the certified hardware.  No using the code that came from the factory, it has to be a fresh install for each election cycle.

Finally, there has to be some kind of auditing.  I like a distributed auditing systems.  I think each person's vote should be encoded and put on a public website.  The voter gets a PRINTED receipt with a pin number after their vote and they can use that pin number to view the official vote that was recorded for them.  This allows for widespread certification that the votes recorded are the votes intended.

Last idea: The system should continue to use the current paper ballots that are used by the machines for a period of a few years until the voters, the vote counters, and the election officials are satisfied that the electronic voting system has matured enough to replace paper ballots.

You know it took me longer to write this post than it took for me to think of these ideas. 
Logged
mn_kthompson
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 58



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2006, 09:59:02 PM »

Man this stinks!  Every time I come up with a good idea it turns out that someone else thought of it first.  At this rate I'm never going to invent something super cool and get my birthday made into a national holiday.
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/05/2234252
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.