Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 38 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Network Pen Testingarrow ICMP scan
EH-Net
May 23, 2013, 01:26:59 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: ICMP scan  (Read 5578 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
deviltaz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: April 20, 2011, 08:50:00 PM »

Let's say hypothetically, I was connected to a wireless network at a local restaurant/coffee establishment.  And the IP address assigned to my device was 10.0.0.20.  And hypothetically, I fired up Nmap and ran an ICMP scan against 10.0.0.0/24.  The only hosts alive were my device and the AP.  Let's say the place was packed, and more than 1/2 the folks had laptops, there should be more than two hosts that would answer a ping, correct?  (Let's say most of the folks were connected to the wireless network).  Angry IP Scanner produced the same results.

thanks
Logged
lorddicranius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 447



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2011, 08:53:34 PM »

I'm pretty sure that certain WAPs allow you to configure the device so that clients aren't able to see other clients.  I believe I read about this in some Cisco WAP documentation, but I'm unable to remember the specific model to quote it.

**EDIT**
Found it: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/csbap/wap4410n/administration/guide/WAP4410N_Admin_Guide.pdf

Quote
To prevent wireless computers associated to the same SSID from seeing and transferring files between each other, in the Wireless Isolation (within SSID) field, click Enabled.

You may be experiencing a similar configuration.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2011, 09:23:13 PM by lorddicranius » Logged

GSEC, eCPPT, Sec+
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2011, 10:51:13 PM »

*Hypothetically*

I'd try another method than ICMP to find hosts nearby. Maybe ARP...maybe NBNS....maybe a TCP SYN scan to TCP/139 or TCP/445.

Or, just fire up Wireshark and see who's broadcasting.
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
TheXero
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


Try Harder!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2011, 03:32:34 AM »

As Ziggy_567 said, do an ARP scan

According to the IPv4 module machines have to respond to ARP requests.

The problem with ICMP is that it can be blocked just like ports whereas ARP should never be blocked inside of a network.  ARP can't travel beyond a router but locally should work just fine.

~TheXero
Logged

deviltaz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2011, 10:11:18 PM »

Thanks!  Appreciate the feedback.
Logged
lorddicranius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 447



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2011, 11:58:12 PM »

Good points ziggy and TheXero.  I wonder now, how does that Cisco config work?  I wonder how it implements that "wireless isolation."
Logged

GSEC, eCPPT, Sec+
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1057


aka dynamik


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2011, 11:37:13 AM »

Good points ziggy and TheXero.  I wonder now, how does that Cisco config work?  I wonder how it implements that "wireless isolation."

It's analogous to VLANs.
Logged

WIP: GCFA | www.infosiege.net | @infosiege

The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
lorddicranius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 447



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2011, 01:36:39 PM »

Good points ziggy and TheXero.  I wonder now, how does that Cisco config work?  I wonder how it implements that "wireless isolation."

It's analogous to VLANs.

I haven't even had time to ponder this thought lol.  Thanks dynamik Smiley
Logged

GSEC, eCPPT, Sec+
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.064 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.