Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 32 guests and 1 member online
 
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Wirelessarrow WPA WPA2 Cracking no longer a problem
EH-Net
May 25, 2013, 04:51:34 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: WPA WPA2 Cracking no longer a problem  (Read 13084 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
millwalll
Guest
« on: March 28, 2011, 08:13:51 AM »

Hi All,

Many of us know that cracking WPA and WPA2 keys was never 100% secure. However as long as the Key used was complex and long enought it was not a easy process to brutt force the key, as it would take days,week,monts even.

Introduing the cloud

Nowdays its very cheap to hire super computers that run a lot faster and can run a English dictionary of 284 million words in around 55 min for around $40 so how secure is WPA and WPA2 now?

http://www.wpacracker.com/index.html



Logged
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1633



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 28, 2011, 09:04:21 AM »

Nice!  Sure saves time, if they truly have the setup to handle it, as they claim.  (Wouldn't surprise me, and was bound to show up, sooner or later.)

Then again, there's no guarantee, still, that it'll be in a dictionary (the smart ones WON'T use dictionary words, or even easy permutations...)
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1633



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2011, 09:12:04 AM »

...so how secure is WPA and WPA2 now?

So I'd say, still VERY secure, if on WPA2, assuming the person BEHIND the password / passphrase puts their thought into it.  Advances will come, over time, but the reality is, if the person / people implementing do it right, it's still pretty solid.
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
millwalll
Guest
« Reply #3 on: March 28, 2011, 09:17:42 AM »

That is ture hayabusa.
Logged
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1633



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 28, 2011, 09:24:26 AM »

Actually, I'll go one step further on this, just to clarify my thoughts...

Certainly, for the low value, it's worth using in a pentest, to TRY to crack the protection, and get in.  I think, even more, that the value of this lies more for security auditors, to ensure that a company DID do the smart thing, and took proper care / precaution in selecting their passphrases / keys, etc. 

So not saying there's no value in this service.  Just that, if you're a pentester, you've got to know that IF you're going against a network where the admins had half a clue, you're liable to hit a dead end (albeit much more quickly  Tongue)
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
WCNA
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 187



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 28, 2011, 11:53:22 AM »

That brings up one the ironic things about pentesting. Failing to break in is a good thing. Unfortunately, companies don't know whether the failure to break in was due to good security or a poor pentest. Luckily, standards are being adopted.
Logged

ISC2 Associate, WCNA, CWNA, OSCP, Network+
jsm725
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 36



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2011, 12:15:17 PM »

So this brings up an interesting question. Yes we could do this to speed up the process of cracking WPA/WPA2, but should we do this?

What are the implications of giving client information to a third party that doesn't have a contractual obligation to the client? What type of agreement are you making with WPACrack before you hand over a .pcap of client data?
Logged

CISSP, PCI-QSA, OSWP
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1633



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2011, 12:27:00 PM »

@jsm725 - Personally, I'd strip the pcap down to only the auth packets needed to crack the WPA.  Additionally, one would HOPE, anyway, that any IP's in the pcap are internal, and that there's nothing publicly indentifiable in there.  This is all assuming I use their service, to begin with.

That's my take, anyway...

@WCNA - agreed, and good that folks are working towards some standards.  Either way, though, if I were to hire someone to pentest me, I'd want a detail of their methods and attacks they attempted, so I could decide, for myself, about the 'quality' of the services they performed.  A GOOD pentest report WILL include the technical details and steps, for the technical folks to review, afterwards.
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
hell_razor
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2011, 12:36:52 PM »

That brings up one the ironic things about pentesting. Failing to break in is a good thing. Unfortunately, companies don't know whether the failure to break in was due to good security or a poor pentest. Luckily, standards are being adopted.

This is why setting up a honeynet with some "open" doors might be a good thing.  If they find it, and get in and identify it as such, then they may know their stuff.  If they either do not find it or cannot get in and effectively identify it, then I would question their ability.
Logged

A+, Network+, Server+, CISSP, GSEC, GCIH, GPEN, GCIA, GISP, GCFW
millwalll
Guest
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2011, 12:55:33 PM »

I agree with all comments so far. and yes as long you have a good team in place your wifi should be fine.

So should companies invest in or configuare better security for there wifi ? or should they still think WPA/WPA2 is fine to keep them safe.

I know a lot of companies that have there wifi setup with WPA2 and that is about as far as it goes.
Logged
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1633



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2011, 02:56:42 PM »

To me, it all depends on the purpose of the wifi, etc.  If it's mission critical stuff, many customers I deal with STILL require a forced VPN login, after authenticating to the wifi, to reach internal systems.  This is sensible, and adds just one more layer to break through, should an attacker get past the original wireless authentication.

IMHO, you can NEVER be TOO safe, however, you also have to weigh usability / support costs against 'security', and come up with the best mix for your organization.
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
n4zty
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2011, 07:40:49 PM »

Hey guys this topic truly interest me since im from the howardforums.com and we are discussing ways of bypassing the wpa2 key for wifi tethering on the samsung galaxy indulge and seems no one has been able to get around it i dont suppose any of ya might know a way to get around this if not then i suppose we will have to keep looking around.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.