Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 52 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Otherarrow Defending the Castle by Actively Abusing It
EH-Net
May 19, 2013, 11:46:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Defending the Castle by Actively Abusing It  (Read 8684 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« on: March 27, 2011, 11:18:37 AM »

The following paper was submitted as my thesis for the RWSP certification. Thought others may find interest in it.

Abstract

Research indicates that current trends in information security threats outpaces the security controls that reduce and or eliminate information security vulnerabilities. This document examines the approach of achieving maximum information security defensibility, by utilizing effective offensive testing. Compared are the differences in the effectiveness of security testing by performing a controlled test – referred to as “vanilla” testing, and a responsibly orchestrated blackhat test. Contrary to popular industry belief, realistic “adversarial” testing can be accomplished in a responsible manner without the consequences of “bringing down the house,” contrary to popular belief. Offered, are arguments, costs associated with testing, and counterpoints against organizational decisions that disallow certain types of testing. Blackhat based testing is similar to what a malicious and structured attacker would perform and it is believed that by performing “blackhat” testing, we are taking a “realistic” approach to vulnerability testing. This is the proper route to take to ensure fully scoping the potential vulnerabilities in a given environment in an effort to maintain proper defensibility.

http://www.infiltrated.net/defending-the-castle.pdf

For those seeking more information about the RWSP:

Quote
The RWSP is based on an individual's ability to handle and react to real-world security situations. Security within the RWSP is approached from both an offensive and defensive perspective. The RWSP is a peer reviewed certification that is composed of three (3) primary components:

1) The Real World Security: Attack, Defend, and Repel training course is an intensive, hands-on course for intermediate to advanced security professionals. Students are split into two (2) teams allowing for one (1) day focused on offensive aspects and one (1) day focused on defensive aspects. The simulations are real, but based on a fictional storyline. The training course allows for the practical demonstration of skills and allows the students of the course to review the participation, leadership, and contributions of each RWSP candidate students.

2) Knowledge Metric: Immediately following the completion of the Real World Security: Attack, Defend, and Repel course a knowledge metric (test) is given to those individuals wishing to become a candidate for the RWSP certification. After successfully passing the knowledge metric with a 70% or better, the individual becomes an RWSP candidate.

3)Peer Reviewed RWSP Project: This practical written project is an information security focused around a topic of interest to the RWSP candidate. Initially, RWSP candidates are given 60 days to complete the project based on a given collegiate writing standard, such as APA or MLA. In this format, papers are expected to cover the subject thoroughly and end up at approximately 15 pages.

http://www.rwsp.org
Logged

yatz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 222


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2011, 12:19:03 PM »

Sil, it never ceases to amaze me the sheer volume of text you seem to produce.  Thanks yet again for a nice piece of reading.
Logged

"Live as though you would die tomorrow, learn as though you would live forever."

CCNA, MCSA, MCTS, Sec+, Net+, Linux+, CEH
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2011, 12:39:23 PM »

Great read, sil, as always!  Thanks.
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2011, 01:02:05 PM »

Sil, it never ceases to amaze me the sheer volume of text you seem to produce.  Thanks yet again for a nice piece of reading.

Sad And I've been actually trying to tone down the volume! I responded to an "article" (say that lightly) and both my responses to the "author" were probably longer than every article he ever wrote collectively (https://infosecisland.com/blogview/12694-State-Actors-Develop-Cyberweapons-to-Cripple-Infrastructure.html) ...

Paper was a bit difficult due to the nature (APA format)... I needed to include images to have readers understand it (mind you APA = no pictures). Nevertheless, its this same approach I take to perform testing: "Let me do what I need to do... Otherwise you're selling yourself short on a pentest." I tried to write it not only as a thesis, but as a paper to allow others in this industry the necessary relevancy in pitching blackhat style (realistic) testing to managers, while explaining to managers why they need to allow their workers to do what needs to be done. "You can't run that tool!!!" Sure I can and its advisable that you allow me to
Logged

hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2011, 01:47:23 PM »

"You can't run that tool!!!" Sure I can and its advisable that you allow me to."

<nod> and amen!
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
AndyB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 100



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2011, 02:48:51 PM »

Nice bit of testing and great write up.

I take it that the mind-set you put across about the testing, as in don't test it too hard as you may break it, is prevelent out there? 
Logged

Net+ Sec+ More to come
skitch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2011, 02:51:42 PM »

Nice read! I liked your points stressing the importance of client side assessments and the definitions/approaches of the different types of attackers. While maybe outside the scope of this paper, it would have been nice to see a counter-argument to a "reckless" audit from a corporate perspective.

The cost analysis for the red team and its comparison to a breach was also a nice touch, thanks for sharing :]
Logged
lorddicranius
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 447



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2011, 01:24:43 AM »

I tried to write it not only as a thesis, but as a paper to allow others in this industry the necessary relevancy in pitching blackhat style (realistic) testing to managers, while explaining to managers why they need to allow their workers to do what needs to be done. "You can't run that tool!!!" Sure I can and its advisable that you allow me to

This is spot on, very nice write up!  And I agree w/ skitch on the cost analysis bit.  I know I'll be re-reading this and using some of the points you've made in future discussions with my company.  Thanks again for sharing! Smiley
Logged

GSEC, eCPPT, Sec+
R3B005t
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2011, 06:41:54 AM »

Sil I continue to be impressed by your unique views and insight.    I think you and I are in pretty much the same boat; I’ve got 2 kids 2 and 3, work, school, heavy metal, video games etc... Where does one find the time to compose such well thought out responses? I caught your response to the SCADA article and must admit I LOLd a bit.  +1 for the KFC reference!
Logged
hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 11, 2011, 10:59:01 AM »

sil - you got some attention, today.  Dave Aitel (Immunity) tweet'd a link to your paper on slideshare, today.  Was nice to see your doc pop up again.  ;-)
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: June 11, 2011, 01:54:48 PM »

Dave & co >= pimp*
Logged

hayabusa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1630



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: June 11, 2011, 02:14:37 PM »

LOL
Logged

~ hayabusa ~ 

"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved." - Sun Tzu, 'The Art of War'


OSCE, OSCP , GPEN, C|EH
alucian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2011, 12:24:07 PM »


Paper was a bit difficult due to the nature (APA format)... I needed to include images to have readers understand it (mind you APA = no pictures). Nevertheless, its this same approach I take to perform testing: "Let me do what I need to do... Otherwise you're selling yourself short on a pentest." I tried to write it not only as a thesis, but as a paper to allow others in this industry the necessary relevancy in pitching blackhat style (realistic) testing to managers, while explaining to managers why they need to allow their workers to do what needs to be done. "You can't run that tool!!!" Sure I can and its advisable that you allow me to
Thank you very much for this paper!

I presented it to my managers and they bought it. It really helped me. After few months of fighting I start to see a change in their attitude towards security. One of them told me that before they were looking for IT security specialists with a lot of experience in doing all kind of documents and processes. Now he will look more for technical skills.

Keep up the good writing.
Logged

CISSP ISSAP, CISM/A, GWAPT, GCIH, eCPPT, OSWP
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: June 13, 2011, 01:08:56 PM »

alucian, I'm glad it helped. I just scribbled something on infosecisland a bit similar called: "Security - Stupid is as Stupid Does" https://infosecisland.com/blogview/14329-Security-Stupid-Is-As-Stupid-Does.html worth reading if you have some spare time. Its not technical, more of like "techie vs. management"
Logged

alucian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 13, 2011, 02:57:37 PM »

Nice article. Already commented on the other site.

Thanks!

PS How do you think that internal audit can help the security department? In some institutions they have a lot of power, but is it used in the right way?
Logged

CISSP ISSAP, CISM/A, GWAPT, GCIH, eCPPT, OSWP
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.12 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.