Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 40 guests and 3 members online
 
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

You are here: Home arrow Resourcesarrow Toolsarrow Canvas versus Metasploit
EH-Net
May 19, 2013, 03:53:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Canvas versus Metasploit  (Read 19646 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1057


aka dynamik


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 17, 2010, 04:36:10 PM »

Hey man, as long as the problem isn't me being an idiot and missing something obvious, it's all good Cheesy
Logged

WIP: GCFA | www.infosiege.net | @infosiege

The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
hdmoore
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 26, 2010, 10:47:27 AM »

Nice new video! This comparison highlights one thing that Metasploit Express does really well - it will not run an exploit in the Great category unless it can precisely fingerprint the target. The latest video, the target is running Windows 2003 and is missing the MS08-067 patch. In the default configuration, you can't fingerprint the language pack or presence of NX on this OS version.

The reason why Metasploit Express skipped this system is that it could not reliably fingerprint it and choose the correct target. It appears that CANVAS just launched the exploit anyways, which is why you got a shell Smiley Running the same CANVAS attack against a non-English version of that 2003 installation would likely just crash the svchost process. If the SP1/SP2 version of 2003 is used, you also have to content with ROP/NX targets. CANVAS may work even better here, but without accurate OS and language pack fingerprinting (ie. the user specifies the target based on their knowledge), this will also crash non-English systems.

At the end of the day, CANVAS still got a shell on this system, where Metasploit Express did not, but the stability of the target network is often just as important as whether you get in during most engagements.

If you have time to do another comparison, try running against a larger number of systems and include some that are not the English language pack.

Logged
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: August 26, 2010, 11:55:56 AM »

@HD, will do. Locally (work) I actually automate msploit (community) and Canvas to check, fix (if needed), Shavlik to oversee, OSSIM to mop it all up and make it pretty. I have it running across a /22 internally. So I'll do my monthly checks and balances starting next month using nothing but Metasploit Express. Well at least for as many hosts as I can (I'm on trial here - unless you want to give me a 1 day license *shmooze shmooze*)

You stated: "At the end of the day, CANVAS still got a shell on this system, where Metasploit Express did not, but the stability of the target network is often just as important as whether you get in during most engagements." True, sort of.

E.g., what you haven't seen is what is going on behind the scene in my version of the real world. I actually use metasploit for quick identifications of vulnerabilities and the possibility of exploitation on a more direct (targeted/focused) level then I do Canvas. I have more way flexibility with MSploit versus Canvas. However, few things, Dave and company (Immunity) have found some seriously cool stuff not available publicly (meaning, you're not going to find it on exploit-db, etc.). Also, I've yet to crash a machine to the point of it being unresponsive with Canvas. (This has been my experience) I'm well aware that certain exploits from ANY tool can be brutal, but to be honest, if I had to count machines I've tested in a one year span, I've easily hit up 400-600 machines with BOTH tools and none have caused a crash *yet*. This includes services AND machines. What I have noticed though, is when I do hooks (backdoor type stuff), sure I've had hangs, service restarts. But this was with both Canvas and Metasploit.

Now, comparison from my POV? Canvas is only used as what I consider "the last resort/big guns." For the most part I use Metasploit even though I generally prefer to do things manually (yup I like the punishment, learned this trick from a friend at KoreLogic) When I am using Metasploit - I'm doing so because it has some kick ass functions (pattern_create has saved me mucho time) I can't find with any other tool(s). Metasploit bundles a heck of a lot up for me.

Aside from that, I use metasploit more than Canvas since I go back and forth between msploit and WinBDG via byakugan (mushishi!) whereas I can't do that with (easily) Canvas. I know I could probably slap in Immunity Debugger but I feel more comfortable with WinDBG which moves Metasploit into my first choice. Because of byakugan, !exploitable and other slap ons. This is just me though.

Logged

sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2010, 01:42:00 PM »

Rutroh... Core versus Canvas

http://www.infiltrated.net/Core-vs-Canvas/

Warning, will take a moment or two (or 2-3 minutes your pick)
Logged

alucian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 17, 2010, 08:04:46 AM »

Thank you for the videos!

We really appreciate that you take the time to share your knowledge/experience with us.


Also, if it is possible, it will be preferable to comment (voice instead of music) what you are doing.

Thanks again!
« Last Edit: November 17, 2010, 08:16:58 AM by alucian » Logged

CISSP ISSAP, CISM/A, GWAPT, GCIH, eCPPT, OSWP
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.