Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 30 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Network Pen Testingarrow Custom exploits // fuzzing
EH-Net
May 22, 2013, 11:09:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Custom exploits // fuzzing  (Read 3751 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
secureseven
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile
« on: October 11, 2010, 07:55:43 PM »

Hey guys, what's up? It's been a while since I've had time to log in and check the forums, I've been pretty busy. A fast question came up for debate with a friend of mine and I was wondering what you would normally do during a pentest.

Let's say client-side attacks are not part of the rules of engagement, so you're left with service-side attacks, misconfigurations, web app, etc. If you find services that aren't part of metasploit or other online exploit DBs, do you normally take the time to fuzz the service and create a custom exploit? Or do you move on and try to find a different point of entry? The scope of time is between 2-3 weeks of a large organization. This is just something a friend and I were trying to determine. I especially look forward to reponses from those who aren't very strong in exploit development/fuzzing/RE etc. Not saying that you can't do those, just aren't strong in them, so it may take a long time to actually find a vulnerability in the service.
Logged

http://twitter.com/mikesantillana
eLearnSecurity Team Member.
MaXe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 669


I've just upgraded myself to a cyborg muahahaa!!1


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2010, 03:45:18 AM »

Hey guys, what's up? It's been a while since I've had time to log in and check the forums, I've been pretty busy. A fast question came up for debate with a friend of mine and I was wondering what you would normally do during a pentest.

Let's say client-side attacks are not part of the rules of engagement, so you're left with service-side attacks, misconfigurations, web app, etc. If you find services that aren't part of metasploit or other online exploit DBs, do you normally take the time to fuzz the service and create a custom exploit? Or do you move on and try to find a different point of entry? The scope of time is between 2-3 weeks of a large organization. This is just something a friend and I were trying to determine. I especially look forward to reponses from those who aren't very strong in exploit development/fuzzing/RE etc. Not saying that you can't do those, just aren't strong in them, so it may take a long time to actually find a vulnerability in the service.

Finding a 0day in a software service may be very time consuming, but it all depends on the target.

Finding 0days in Web Applications is relatively easy in most cases.

Using only known exploits will limit your chance of cracking the perimeter, except if the target is seriously outdated or new exploits has just been released for you to use and so forth.

Sometimes, it's just a matter of time before a new vulnerability emerges.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2010, 03:47:45 AM by MaXe » Logged

I'm an InterN0T'er
secureseven
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2010, 10:03:45 AM »

Thanks for your reply MaXe, that was my side of the argument. I figured, if other vectors aren't possible (which should be rare) a custom exploit would be needed as last resort. Have any of you come across a situation?
Logged

http://twitter.com/mikesantillana
eLearnSecurity Team Member.
Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2010, 03:36:52 PM »

I think this really depends on your engagement.  Arguably, all software has some sort of vulnerability, that given enough time you can exploit.  In a consulting engagement, you don't always have the time. 

I usually try to find the path of least resistance.   Like MaXe said, it may be easier to find a SQL injection vulnerability in a web application, than to fuzz and exploit some proprietary app.  That's not always the case.  Sometimes developers subscribe to the theory of security by obscurity.  Sometimes a simple network monitor session will reveal all kinds of goofy things.   More often, I find myself modifying a PoC, rather than starting completely from scratch.  Still, there may be times when starting from scratch is all you have.
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
secureseven
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2010, 09:24:07 PM »

Yup, thanks guys. That's pretty much what I said in my argument with my peer lol. But I just wanted to hear the voices of others out there. Good insight from both of you.
Logged

http://twitter.com/mikesantillana
eLearnSecurity Team Member.
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 864



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2010, 07:09:55 AM »

And like for everything in life, it depends!

I once spent a lot of time reviewing an application before it got released, including code review. Once I found a vulnerability, I asked the manager if he wanted me to spend time trying to exploit it (long) or just tell the developpers how to fix it (fast). He said he wanted them to really understand the implications of their mistake, so I got the luxury of spending a few days exploiting it and create a video and a training session. I can tell you that, once you show them that you were able to download the entire database through the vulnerability, they listen to you carefully when you show them how to fix it.

That was a very positive experience for everyone! But it only happened to me once, thanks to a security-aware team lead. But most of the time, I either exploit it when it isn't too time consuming or I ask the client if he wants to spend extra $$$ on it. They usually want to save money...
Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.