Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 35 guests and 2 members online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow General Certificationarrow Securityarrow The value of GSE
EH-Net
May 23, 2013, 05:43:56 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: The value of GSE  (Read 15063 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 865



View Profile
« on: October 04, 2010, 06:56:21 AM »

The GIAC Security Expert (GSE) is, from what I understand, the hardest certification to obtain from SANS/GIAC. In order to get it, you have to earn several other certifications, including "gold" ones where you have to write research papers.
http://www.giac.org/certifications/gse.php

But if you look closely at the link above, it seems that only 22 individuals currently have this certification, compare to tens of thousands owning a "normal" SANS/GIAC cert. This is obviously a very big cert to have!

But other than for personal knowledge, is it worth the time/money/effort? What if you put your energy on, let's say, CEH/CISSP/CISA/GPEN/OSCP/CCNA? I know these certs serve different goals, but combined, they are probably as time consuming than GSE.

It seems to me that, although owning a GSE (and all its sub-certifications) would be very good, having other certifications may be better for you because they are more "known" by employers.

Obviously, it all depends on what is your goal with certs. But I think that for most of us, it is to help us find the job we want to do.

What do you guys think?
Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2010, 08:53:48 AM »

I can tell you that the GSE is very valuable if you are going to be working as a Federal Gov't contractor or as a Federal employee but probably doesn't hold as much weight in the private sector.

This is just speculation on my part, but I bet if you were to look into all the people that hold the GSE that they pretty much do already hold non-GIAC certifications like the CCIE/RHCE/CISSP/etc.
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 865



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2010, 09:16:19 AM »

Quote
they pretty much do already hold non-GIAC certifications
That is certainly true!

But if you compare other certification paths, is it that valuable? Again, only 22 guys have it right now...
Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
mambru
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2010, 10:57:24 AM »

SANS certs are very well respected in the government and private sector, so  no doubt it is valuable.

The GSE can be achieved in different ways, therefore you have certain freedom to build your path according to your needs/wishes. However, these certs are more on the technical side, so if your pursuing a managerial position, maybe it's not the best path.

Logged
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 865



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2010, 11:06:48 AM »

@mambru: I understand GSE very well and indeed, it's quite a achievement! But at the same time, it requires a fairely big chunk of your life. For a pentester for example, would it be better to follow another path?
Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2010, 12:03:47 PM »

Quote
For a pentester for example, would it be better to follow another path?

In my opinion, yes, the GSE is not for someone that is pursuing a "specialist" career path such as pentester, forensic investigator, etc. etc. I see the GSE as a "generalist" certification. Although the certs that you must obtain in order to sit for the GSE are "specialist" certs, the overall body of knowledge that the GSE encompasses is pretty broad. So, I would see a GSE holder in more of a security architect type position than a Sr. Penetration Tester. Now, I'm not saying that studying for and passing the GSE precludes you from being a Sr. Penetration Tester, but the GSE certification will help you in a "generalist" career path more than a "specialist" career path.

For what it's worth, I am not speaking from any personal experience...I have not sat for the GSE and in fact do not even hold the pre-reqs...this is just my halfway informed opinion...

I'd love to hear from a GSE holder if there is one on these forums.
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
mambru
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2010, 12:20:00 PM »

Code:
it requires a fairely big chunk of your life

and a big chunk of your economy as well Wink

I don't agree with ziggy_567, IMHO GSE is a valid path for a Pen Tester. You could achieve it through certs like GPEN, GWAPT, GAWN, GREM which comprise essentials topics for a Pen Tester.
Logged
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2010, 12:29:47 PM »

@mambru

The pre-reqs for the GSE can be accomplished by primarily pentesting certs as you stated, but that doesn't change the fact that the written/practical focuses mostly on the material from the GCIA/GCIH/GSEC tracks.

As I said, a pentester could definitely obtain the GSE, but I think you get more bang for your buck with the GSE if you're following a different career path.
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1057


aka dynamik


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2010, 12:45:59 PM »

I'll be attempting this in 2011 with a (now ex-) coworker of mine. We're starting to put a blog together with notes, lab setups, sample captures, etc. It's mostly just rambling at this point though. I have a month or two of college classes I have to wrap up before I can commit a lot of time to it, but I'm going put an enormous amount of time into it starting in December or January. I'm pursuing this primarily because it's 1) a challenge, and 2) once you obtain it, you can renew all your GIAC certs by passing the GSE written exam once every four years.

Chris Mohan took a stab at it this year, and he's posted some thoughts on his blog: www.chris-mohan.com I can only imagine how excruciating the 30-day wait would be, ugh...
Logged

WIP: GCFA | www.infosiege.net | @infosiege

The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 865



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2010, 01:54:38 PM »

This is all good guys, but no one seems to answer my main question! Wink

Is it worth the effort compare to other certs?
Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2010, 02:07:18 PM »

Quote
Is it worth the effort compare to other certs?

With all due respect, that is a very personal question!  Grin

Like dynamik, I think it would be worth it for the challenge of it and the fact that I don't have to renew ALL my GIAC certs. All I have to do is pass the written every four years.
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1057


aka dynamik


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2010, 02:28:50 PM »

Code:
it requires a fairely big chunk of your life

and a big chunk of your economy as well Wink

I don't agree with ziggy_567, IMHO GSE is a valid path for a Pen Tester. You could achieve it through certs like GPEN, GWAPT, GAWN, GREM which comprise essentials topics for a Pen Tester.

I missed this; that's actually not true. The exam is structured around the GCIH and GCIA. Windows and Linux skills are also required with either the GSEC or both GCUX and GCWN. I wouldn't necessarily call it a generalist certification, but it's definitely focused on IA and IH and not pen testing. While you can substitute additional 500-level certifications for the required gold papers, it's not going to change the focus of the exam even if you decide to do something like GPEN and GWAPT. That's not to say that type of knowledge wouldn't be useful on the exam, but again, it's not the focus. There were rumors of a GSE for penetration testing that included GPEN, GAWN, and GWAPT, but I asked recently and was told there were currently no plans for it.

Is it worth the effort compare to other certs?

Honestly, probably not. The only times I've seen it mentioned on job applicant wish lists have been in a ridiculous context, such as, "GIAC or GSE certified." Like you've observed, there have only been a couple dozen since it started in 2003. I'm doing it for personal reasons and because I want to feel like I'm part of an exclusive geek club Wink

If you're pursuing certifications because you want mass recognition, this probably isn't the one to go after. I wouldn't expected the masses who aren't in-the-know (read: hiring managers) to even be aware of it, but they'd probably think you could walk on water if you told them you were a CCIE.

Or, I'm just telling you that to discourage you to keep the numbers low. Who knows...? Roll Eyes
Logged

WIP: GCFA | www.infosiege.net | @infosiege

The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
mambru
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2010, 03:34:55 PM »

@dynamik

Please don't misunderstand me.  I'm not saying GSE can be build upon pen testing certs exclusively, I know GSEC, GCIH and GCIA are the core for GSE, but you can include GPEN, GWAPT, GAWN, which are directly related to pen testers. And GSEC, GCIH and GCIA comprises the basic skills any security guy should have, even a pen tester.

That's why I think GSE is worth the effort, personally I don't pursue certs because their renown, but because what they offer to teach me and skills I can acquire.
Logged
H1t M0nk3y
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 865



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 04, 2010, 06:04:26 PM »

Quote
With all due respect, that is a very personal question!
It is indeed a very personal question that you can answer anonymously through your nickname "ziggy_567 "...  Cheesy

Quote
Honestly, probably not. The only times I've seen it mentioned on job applicant wish lists have been in a ridiculous context, such as, "GIAC or GSE certified." Like you've observed, there have only been a couple dozen since it started in 2003. I'm doing it for personal reasons and because I want to feel like I'm part of an exclusive geek club

That's the kind of answer I was looking for, thanks dynamik!

Quote
That's why I think GSE is worth the effort, personally I don't pursue certs because their renown, but because what they offer to teach me and skills I can acquire.
I agree with you mambru! I see two main advantages of certs in general:
1) It is like a learning plan to help and guide me in a perticular field;
2) It helps me tell recruters that I know a few things in the field.

So for me GSE (and its "sub-certs") :
1) It is a huge learning plan, incredible for personal experience!!!
2) Like dynamik mentioned, not a lot of people know about it.

While for me, something like CEH/OSCP/CISSP/CCNA:
1) It is a huge learning plan, incredible for personal experience!!!
2) A lot of people know about them

So you guys know where my heart belongs...  Smiley


Logged

OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GSEC, CEH, CISSP
What90
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 120


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 13, 2010, 12:40:04 AM »

Hello H1t M0nk3y,

A resounding YES to your question: Is the GSE worth the time/money/effort?

I didn't do it for the glory, fame or to get a pay rise. I did it to learn and wow, did I learn.

I’m one of ziggy_567’s generalists, pretty much focused on the defensive side, but there are some super smart offensive guys that are GSE’s, so it is up to the person taking the exam to work out the personal value. The people taking the GSE with me were a very diverse group. The only real definition I would place on them is they are all driven, seasoned security professionals with a desire to test and push themselves.

I’ve got a number of other qualifications and always on the lookout for inspiring trainers and courseware to make me want learn. The GSE is a long term goal, rather short to mid-term one, so by all means take and excel in CEH/CISSP/CISA/GPEN/OSCP/CCNA etc, but once you completed them it is great to have somewhere else to aim for, should that be the path you want to follow.

As a career advantage, it definitely helps you stand out. If you’re going for a security role and the interviewer doesn’t know what a GSE is or says about your abilities, then I’d suggest you’re applying for the wrong role. Again this is a big picture, long term career certification.

My simple analogy; this is a CCIE/MBA for the security industry that is recognised as hands on ability. SANS is market leader for corporate security education and for good reason, in my opinion, so this level of testing and certification isn’t for everyone.  Other companies may come along and offer similar levels of exams, and I hope they do, but the security industry needs to have clear examples for non-industry people to differentiate ability and knowledge.
 
I know enough networking folk to realise that certs don’t make the engineer, it’s skill, knowledge, ability and experience that do. Practical exams test those four areas, so you prove firsthand that it’s not book or braindump smarts, and that’s praiseworthy in my book. The GSE has a soft skills component, so while it is a very technical exam, being a back office, exploit-coding god without impersonal skills means you’re likely to fail. It is vital to be a good, or even great, communicator as a security professional or your message fails on uncaring ears and you fail.

Money is a big issue, but I’d say any taught education costs. Once someone else stops paying for your education, you really have to be motivated to expend time and energy never mind the money. SANS is focused toward companies and organisations willing to pay for good training, so hopefully work will pick up the tab for most of the training. If you’re doing this out of your own pocket, do what I did – apply as a SANS work study volunteer:  http://www.sans.org/security-training/volunteer.php

I hope that lots of people step up and challenge the GSE exam, to better themselves, continually push the industry to keep current and give others something to aim for being. Like anything the more people that are GSE’s the more they’ll be in demand. Cisco’s CCIE program started in 1993, considered as one of the hardest exam certifications, has over 22 thousand certified CCIEs nearly twenty years on. You decide if this is due to people want to excel and prove their skills or market demand. Or both :-)

A minor correction to your original post, there’s 29 people who are GSEs - now ;-)
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.