Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 32 guests and 2 members online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Network Pen Testingarrow remediation
EH-Net
May 19, 2013, 12:29:52 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: remediation  (Read 1904 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
crossover
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


View Profile
« on: September 11, 2010, 04:33:43 PM »

During remediation results obtained from VA Scanner what levels you considered to remediate. Is the general practise to remediate from level 5-3 ( as they can be related CIA ) ??  or what is the common practise followed in the industry
Logged
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2010, 01:24:10 PM »

Your remediation plan should always be based on risk vs. reward in your environment. This is a function of Risk Management. The level of the vulnerability does not define the level of risk. For a vulnerability to become risk, you must also have a threat present. Therefore, a level 5 vulnerability with no threat can be categorized as a low risk vulnerability, but a level 3 vulnerability with a high threat should be categorized as a high risk vulnerability.

Basically, though, all vulnerabilities found should be dealt with eventually. You first work through the ones with the highest risk associated with them. You should then work into the medium risk ones. Lastly, you should deal with the low risk ones.

With that in mind, it is not always necessary that you remove the vulnerability completely. You may decide that the risk posed is acceptable. Its a risk and reward balancing act...with compensating controls or removal as viable options.

Hope that helps...
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.065 seconds with 22 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.