In Canada, the Communications Security Establishment (CSE) is more or less the equivalent of the NSA in the United-States. They are responsible for evaluating security professionals working for the canadian government. Here are the ONLY certs they value:

CISSP from (ISC)2
CISSP / ISSEP from (ISC)2
CISSP / ISSAP from (ISC)2
CISSP / ISSMP from (ISC)2
CISM from ISACA
CISA
GIAC / Any Silver audit certification
GIAC / Any Gold audit certification
GIAC / Any Silver management certification
GIAC / GSFP, GEIT Gold management certification

We are always 5 years behind the american DoD...

I thought about it a few times. The fact is, I would likely have a few books to write. Some would make people do a Home Alone (http://images.eonline.com/eol_images/Articles/20071211/293.home.alone.121107.jpg). I thought about an "Art of Cyberwarfare" style book based on attacks with explanations of the attack vector and logic behind potential defenses. The problem with this style of writing would be that the moment that the book was quoted as being behind some scriptkiddiot's attack, would be the moment the industry would poop on the book: "How could they publish such a book!"

The reality is, in order to truly comprehend ANY defensive strategy, one MUST be familiar with the attack vector and the inherent and potential dangers behind it. For example, in 2005 Theo DeRaadt @ OpenBSD decided away with ICMP source quenches in the network stack to which I responded... "Nothing new move along" (http://www.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/securityfocus/bugtraq/2005-07/0101.html) I had written about this starting in 1999 and releasing a PoC in 2000 (http://www2.packetstormsecurity.org/cgi-bin/search/search.cgi?searchvalue=tidcmp&type=archives&[search].x=0&[search].y=0)

People didn't get it then. Same went for Bubonic and Daemonic. Back then Richard Bejtlich got it (http://seclists.org/incidents/2000/Aug/277) others didn't. Right now I have a pretty nasty tool I won't ever release because it literally allows me to turn your device into a firewall like it or not. Imagine that for a moment... I aim it at any networked device you have, that device stops sending and receiving period until I give you room to breathe. I went over the tool and what it does with NANOG, IETF, Cisco, Foundry, Sun and others. Its really nasty, the solution? Rewrite TCP which no one would do. (seriously) Ask yourself, if I can find this tinkering how long before someone has as much time and weird creativity or can fuzz that much.

I did think about the book gig before, the problem: Content... I wouldn't want to do anything anyone else has done. In order for a company to publish it, there has to be an audience. An audience filled with "Go to hell...", "why the f,,, would someone write this book!...", "there goes our networks..." wouldn't make for much appeal

Intesting article.

Rember doesn't matter were you are there will be always somebody that will say: does not important, etc, etc

That is absolutely true, especially in Canada. I do not know how the similarity comes to have taken place but the truth is the communication security establishment is very much similar or almost similar to the National Security agency of the United States of America. I guess there has been a medical report of someone trying to poison another official there. At least that is what I have heard from the hospital I have worked in USA