Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 50 guests and 1 member online
 
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Otherarrow Do you think media is responsible for misinterpreting the word hacking or hacker
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 03:27:54 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Do you think media is responsible for misinterpreting the word hacking or hacker as something illegal or malicious?
Yes - 7 (100%)
No - 0 (0%)
Can't Say - 0 (0%)
Total Voters: 7

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Do you think media is responsible for misinterpreting the word hacking or hacker  (Read 3164 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Manu Zacharia (-M-)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 393


c0c0n Hacking Conference - where hackers unite


View Profile WWW
« on: May 08, 2010, 09:40:21 AM »

Many times we have come across newspaper articles and TV news where the word hacking or hacker is being portrayed as an illegal or malicious activity. Some people say that the media is responsible for this misinterpretation.

Whenever I or our community (local security and hacking community) come across people using hacking or hacker in negative sense, we always raised our voice stating that hacking is not illegal. It is all about understanding how systems work. I would like to have the input from EH-Net Community on this so that I can have better understanding and use it as a statistical reference during debates and discussions.

Kindly participate in the EH-Net Poll (this thread) and also the independent poll which is available here:

http://polls.linkedin.com/p/87847/emfrb
and
http://www.acepolls.com/polls/1121165-do-you-think-media-is-responsible-for-giving-hacking-a-negative-meaning

« Last Edit: May 08, 2010, 10:25:46 AM by Manu Zacharia (-M-) » Logged

Manu Zacharia
MVP (Enterprise Security), ISLA-2010 (ISC)˛, C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCP,
Certified ISO 27001:2005 Lead Auditor

There are 3 roads to spoil; women, gambling & hacking. The most pleasant with women, the quickest with gambling, but the surest is hacking - c0c0n
chrisj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1163


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2010, 10:37:34 AM »

In the beginning I think they were at fault. Even now to a point, because of the actions at the beginning. However I think it's more of a case of linguistic evolution.

Read through the entry on dictionary.com. Two origins of the word include:

"c.1700, originally, "person hired to do routine work," short for hackney "an ordinary horse""

"Originally, someone who makes furniture with an axe".

Sadly the English language is better at reusing words than it is at coming up with new ones.
Logged

OSWP, Sec+
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2010, 12:34:57 PM »

Whenever I or our community (local security and hacking community) come across people using hacking or hacker in negative sense, we always raised our voice stating that hacking is not illegal. It is all about understanding how systems work.

The medias job is to report news and if you haven't noticed within the last decade or two, news has to be sensational in order to grab attention so that news media agencies can create revenue.

If you saw the following two headlines, which do you think would be read first:

Malicious Cracker infiltrates banking network
Hackers hack into banking network

Its all a matter of interpretation. Many tech journalist know the differences in a hacker and a cracker but at the end of the day, its all semantics. Would you call Alberto Gonzalez a hacker or a cracker. At the end of the day, him as a cracker HACKED into TJX. Either way you cut it, none are truly wrong.

Let's take an alternative view of headline: "Marine Sniper Controls Attackers in Baghdad" versus "Marine Sniper Assasinates Attackers In Baghdad" or "Enhanced Interrogation" versus "Torture" It's all a matter of interpretation and the effect the media is seeking versus their intended audience. Do you blame the media? For what, their true underlying role is to create revenue via their reporting. It's an old argument that will never be corrected, there is no correction, there are opinions.
Logged

j0rDy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 590


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2010, 04:30:59 AM »

i voted yes, but i couldnt care less. thats why we put the word ethical in front. its a shame we have to, but its no other way.
Logged

ISC2 Associate, CEH, ECSA, OSCP, OSWP

earning my stripes appears to be a road i must travel alone...with a little help of EH.net
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.107 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.