Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 47 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow General Certificationarrow CEH or GPEN more attractive to employers?
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 06:50:28 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: CEH or GPEN more attractive to employers?  (Read 20361 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
T_Bone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 199


View Profile
« on: January 07, 2010, 12:11:21 PM »

Hi Again guys

Yet again, i have another question on certification comparisons i need some advice on Smiley

I am based in the UK and would eventually like to become either CHECK, CREST or TIGERSCHEME Senior certified as these are
the most highly rated security testing certifications in the UK but unfortunately I am unable to do one of them because I dont
have the experience or the money at £1600-£1700 (2500USD) per exam.  I am therefore looking for an alternative
certification to help me get into the security testing industry and would like some advice on which to choose next.

I currently hold the Comptia Security+ and GIAC GCIH certification as of last year and am thinking of going after either the CEH
or GPEN next.  Unfortunately I cannot afford to attend either course and will therefore have to prepare using self study.

The GPEN exam cost £560 (900USD) and the CEH cost £150 (250USD) which is quite a difference in price but would like to know
which of the certifications would be more attractive to employers?

Any comments appreciated  Smiley
Logged
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2010, 01:49:25 PM »

Hey T_bone,

It really depends... Ill try and outline the pros and cons of each below:

CEH:

+ The CEH name has more recognizably right now as the GPEN is still relatively new. HR screening personnel know what a CEH is, some might not have heard of the GPEN.

- Anyone who is a real security person i know laughs about the CEH cert based on its old format. It used to be a half hazard, loosely jointed, outdated tools test. The new versions of the test are greatly improved but unfortunately it left a bad taste in some peoples mouths.

- CEH is a non-hands on test.

GPEN:

+ Hands on test. Recently SANS added some practical/hands-on portions back into their tests. Which is good in my opinion.

+ GPEN is a more technical and in depth test. Anyone who knows about SANS/GIAC knows the test curriculum and program are the best right now for a Penetration Testing specific course.

- Still relatively new and might not be recognized by HR handlers.

Hope that helps.

Logged

T_Bone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2010, 02:34:03 PM »

Hey Jhaddix

Thanks for the quick reply.

Yeah I understand what you mean about how the CEH is felt by real security folk.  I have a friend in the industry and he told me that every security consultant he knows laughs about the CEH, which is why i am reluctant to take it, but when viewing job posts here in the UK for security roles  the majority ask for CHECK or CREST (which is what he is) and you sometimes find the odd one that asks for CEH but never SANS( I think i have only ever seen one posting). 

I quite like the sounds of the OSCP and the E-Learnsecurity course set to be released early this year also but as most HR personel dont know SANS i very much doubt they would know either of these.

Its difficult cause of my lack of experience i am trying to get certs to show my enthusiasm and understanding but the cost is so extreme and do not have a company that can pay for it as i work as a contractor in sys admin.

Logged
grinderman
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2010, 03:11:03 PM »

Hi,

I'm currently both CEH & GPEN (as well as GCIH) and currently progressing towards Check Team Leader so feel that I might have quite a good perspective on this Smiley

CEH is a bit of a joke really - I only took it because I had some training funding which paid for the exam. I did a bit of self study and used the various practice exams and questions scattered across the net. The actual exam took me about 30 minutes point'n'click. People tend to view it as giving you a lot of info on viruses and snort and not much else. However it is very widely recognised and everyone in HR (or an OCR programme) knows it.

GPEN was a great course, it sounds like your thinking of just doing the exam challenge without the course - not something I would recommend!! Although the SANS exams are open book as you know from your GCIH, you still need the books to give you the info! I created an index of my notes and this was totally invaluable in passing - I would have still passed having done the course, a week of revision and 2 practice exams, but it would have been more difficult.

It may be worth looking at the Tiger website http://www.tigerscheme.org/ as they have a tiered approach which would allow you to progress through to CTL. The last comment I'd make is that you cant actually be Check/CREST/Tiger unless your working for a company  which is tied to those organisations, so most people get so far on their own then their company puts them through Check equivalence after relevant experience.

Regards,

Rob Smiley
Logged
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2010, 03:19:02 PM »

grinderman: thanks for the awesome perspective!

A side note, which is interesting, the OSCP actually is gaining some name space. I've had it on on my resume and gotten questions as to how the training and test was. It was very surprising. Real sec people know Muts and the OS people and have much respect for their program.
Logged

T_Bone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2010, 03:55:06 PM »

Thanks for the reply grinderman, that is indeed helpful

So realistically i should probably go for the CEH as it is the cheaper option to add an extra cert to my CV which i hope will work in my favour.  I have checked out the Tigerscheme and the Qualified course and exam is £1590 plus VAT so once again very expensive.

I think at the moment i am just looking for the cheaper and easier way of getting a foundation to enter the security arena, what qualifications did you guys have when you first started off? Or did you just get a break?
Logged
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2010, 04:50:00 PM »

I had a Cisco background in a past life. I took the GSEC 1st GPEN 2nd to break into security.

Really, if you get to a real interview person, try show them you are passionate about current security issues. Let them hear you talk about SQLi, XSS, Newer kernel exploits, etc. They will hire passion over certs in my opinion. Their gonna have to train you for their process/infrastructure when you get hired anyways Wink
Logged

Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 07, 2010, 09:22:16 PM »

Jason, would you go with GPEN or OSCP if you had to chose?
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2010, 12:12:11 AM »

I'd say GPEN first then OSCP later =)
Logged

T_Bone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 08, 2010, 02:07:15 AM »


See this is so frustrating because  my first choice would be to do the GPEN, but would have to do it without attending the course as it is expensive (unless i manage to get the facilitator role as i did with GCIH again, but feel it was a lucky break).  I believe that if i could afford the materials that SANS offer as Self study (which i believe includes books and audio) that would be fine or actually just the books i believe would be sufficient, but this is still too expensive!

I have to admit i am not getting a lot of love for CEH so far and to be honest am not surprised cause its not really the option i wanted to take either...

Decisions.................

I just wish i won the lotto right now  Smiley
Logged
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 08, 2010, 02:54:44 AM »

T_Bone,

The only tests i think SANS could offer that you couldn't pass without the physical classes is the GSEC,  GCIA, GCFA, GREM, and GAWN.

GPEN is totally do-able self study. All the answers are in the books. Study hard and create a spectacular index you will pass.
Logged

UNIX
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 08, 2010, 05:15:55 AM »

I can only speak about CEH as I have done the course, will soon go for the exam and recently had a job interview where I was able to bring it up as well.
I thought that it was only little known by the interviewer, probably because it is more known in the USA - however, it helped to demonstrate that I am interested in security and do more than 'necessary'.

The exam itself (without any course) seems to be quite cheap compared to some of the other certs, therefore I would go for it, if money is short but you want something to do.
Logged
BillV
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1892


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: January 08, 2010, 06:45:50 AM »

I also hold both CEH and GPEN. In my interview for my current position, neither was mentioned or brought up specifically - likely because neither qualify for 8570 currently - but they did say that my security certification were what really stood out, and that probably helped give me an edge on the other candidates.

In my interview yesterday, the manager was familiar with SANS/GIAC but had not heard of GPEN. He also had not heard of CEH or EC-Council.

I agree with Jason, you can surely do GPEN self-study, just make sure you become very familiar with the tools/topics that are listed in the bulletin.

It's certainly a tough decision to make. As you've mentioned the CEH has shown up on job postings (and it is probably more widely known), plus it's cheaper, I would probably go that route.
Logged
T_Bone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 09, 2010, 03:44:12 AM »

I have made a decision to do the CEH now and hopefully fingers crossed will be accepted to be a facilitator at the same SANS conference I did last year!

Thanks for your input guys, i am sure this will not be the last question i ask  Smiley
Logged
KamiCrazy
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 78


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 10, 2010, 03:09:19 PM »

I decided to do the CEH/ECSA/LPT route as it was vastly more affordable than GIAC certs.

I think I could probably do the GPEN without attending the course as long as I had access to the study books. Once I am done with CEPT I think I might give that a go.

(Shameless plug, if anyone would like to sell me their recent GIAC study materials, please send me a PM.)

However the GIAC GWAPT course looks interesting. Not many options out there which focuses on web apps.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.