Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 34 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Network Pen Testingarrow Rapid7 Acquires Metasploit
EH-Net
May 23, 2013, 11:55:39 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rapid7 Acquires Metasploit  (Read 13913 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
apollo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 146


View Profile WWW
« on: October 21, 2009, 08:30:05 AM »

It looks like HD is working for rapid7 :
http://www.rapid7.com/metasploit-announcement.jsp

Logged

CISSP, CSSLP, MCSE+Security, MCTS, CCSP, GPEN, GWAPT, GCWN, NOP, OSCP, Security+
Manu Zacharia (-M-)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 393


c0c0n Hacking Conference - where hackers unite


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2009, 08:31:10 AM »

Yes, its all here now:

http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability_management/security/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220800067

Quote
Vulnerability management vendor Rapid7 has purchased the popular open-source Metasploit penetration testing tool project and named Metasploit founder HD Moore as chief security officer of the company.

Moore, who is synonymous with the Metasploit Project , will continue as chief architect of Metasploit in his new role at Rapid7, and with an initial team of five Rapid7 researchers dedicated to the open-source project, some of whom already have been regular contributors to Metasploit. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.
Logged

Manu Zacharia
MVP (Enterprise Security), ISLA-2010 (ISC)², C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCP,
Certified ISO 27001:2005 Lead Auditor

There are 3 roads to spoil; women, gambling & hacking. The most pleasant with women, the quickest with gambling, but the surest is hacking - c0c0n
jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2009, 08:44:07 AM »

Interesting. Hopefully we don't see it end up like Nessus.
Logged
Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2009, 08:45:24 AM »

Wow, that could be bad news.  I am hoping that it goes the way of Tripwire and not Nessus.   
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
Manu Zacharia (-M-)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 393


c0c0n Hacking Conference - where hackers unite


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2009, 08:50:06 AM »

Let us hope its remains open source.

Quote
Both Moore and Rapid7 say they are well aware of previous open-source and commercial marriages that have gone south, however, such as the Nessus scanning tool, which went from an open-source to a proprietary, closed-source license under Tenable Network Security. They say they are focusing on the open source community to leverage Metasploit. "Our goal is to make sure we improve the open-source" element, Thomas says. "Metasploit will remain open source."
Logged

Manu Zacharia
MVP (Enterprise Security), ISLA-2010 (ISC)², C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCP,
Certified ISO 27001:2005 Lead Auditor

There are 3 roads to spoil; women, gambling & hacking. The most pleasant with women, the quickest with gambling, but the surest is hacking - c0c0n
Equix3n-
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 386



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2009, 09:04:40 AM »

Well, their stand as of now is  "Metasploit will remain open source."

I just hope that Moore has done what he thinks is best for the tool.
Logged
jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2009, 09:06:23 AM »

I sure hope so, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions...
Logged
alucian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2009, 09:23:45 AM »

I doubt that it will remain full open source.
Maybe that it will be a lite version that will be free, but business is to make money  Sad
Hope I'm wrong.

Unfortunately, the ones that will be happy are the bad guys.
Logged

CISSP ISSAP, CISM/A, GWAPT, GCIH, eCPPT, OSWP
chrisj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1163


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2009, 09:27:55 AM »

@ Alucian

They can keep it open source, and charge for training and support. Technically they could charge for the software as well, as long as they give the source code with the product (ala redhat)
Logged

OSWP, Sec+
Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2009, 09:52:40 AM »

Well, I would consider paying for msf if it meant that new exploits and features were added quicker.   The charge would have to be reasonable, like $500 a year for a subscription.   (The free version would still exist and have a delayed update feed.)  We don't need another Core Impact pricing schedule.  Just my $0.02.
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
geekyone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 180



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2009, 10:08:29 AM »

Looks like the biggest thing they were plugging was their NeXpose vulnerability scanner and some kind of integration with msf.  Qualys does something similar with CORE if that is there aim and they leave the products separate like CORE and Qualys that could be a great improvement.
Logged

CISSP, CEH, GPEN, GCIH, GCFA
Jhaddix
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 317



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2009, 02:43:38 PM »

Did a quick post on it here: http://www.securityaegis.com/metasploit-buyout/

Quote
Today HD Moore and Rapid7 announced that Rapid7 has purchased the Metasploit Framework Project. The speculation around this has taken the pentest and vulnerability scanning community by storm.  After talking with some colleagues I have come up with the following, here’s some things you should know:

First, be happy for H.D. Moore. He is one of the hardest working exploit devs and project managers in the world. Not only HD, but Egypt as the first paid core dev for the project.  Congratulate them.  Bravo.

HDM and Rapid7 have stated that “Rapid7 is 100% committed to keeping the project open source and the community development model.” This buyout is not so much of a buyout,  it’s a corporate backing of MSF and HD’s vision of the project. For now (or “anytime soon”) the BSD 3 License will not be going anywhere. MSF will be sticking with Ruby and Rapid7 has no plans, for now, to corporatize MSF.  Rapid7 wants to take the MSF brand and stand behind it.

There is some worry about community submissions to MSF now that it is owned by R7. Rob Fuller (mubix) gave a pretty straight forward answer to that in reply to Sourcefire’s VRT blog:

    “For those not happy that the development for or submission of your ideas / exploits to the Metasploit project now that those submissions will also go to Rapid 7 are seriously underestimating the fact those all those companies were pulling that information already.”

What does it mean for R7’s NeXpose Vulnerability product?

Well, it’s really about extensibility and market share . Adding the exploit database from MSF to NeXpose gives a far better risk rating to the product by adding a way to validate vulnerabilities and rate them by current known exploit code. They also gain the name, rights, branding, and developers for the MSF project which all funnels into Rapid7 corporate brand. As R7’s new CSO HD Moore brings his talents to the R7 table. In addition R7 does not just offer vulnerability management solutions but also penetration testing solutions, which is a market they have fought to be in for a while.  Now they have legs to stand on, so to speak, when battling dominant market competitors like CORE , SAINT, and ImmunitySec.

Catch an exclusive interview with HD and R7 on the Risky Business Podcast =)

Heres a pretty complete article roundup on the buyout:

http://blog.metasploit.com
http://www.metasploit.com/home/faq
http://blog.metasploit.com/2009/10/metasploit-rising.html
http://www.rapid7.com/metasploit-announcement.jsp
http://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid14_gci1371945,00.html
http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerability_management/security/management/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=220800067
http://infosanity.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/rapid7-acquire-metasploit/
http://blog.ianetsec.net/perspective/2009/10/nick-selby-metasploit-acquisition-shakes-up-the-pentest-landscape.html
http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=7417
http://vrt-sourcefire.blogspot.com/2009/10/rapid7-make-bold-statement-acquiring.html
http://www.andrewhay.ca/archives/1085
Logged

Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2009, 03:06:05 PM »

I'm trying to see the positive side:
  • corporate backing means resources for testing and development
  • Core people getting paid to work on MSF means that the project doesn't suffer when 'real' work gets in the way
  • Corporate backing means MSF gets 'approved' for use by companies that don't 'do open source'


Until this point HD and team have done a great job of getting Metasploit off the ground and keeping it growing and evolving to meet changing times. I'll keep faith that this won't change.

Regardless of the future of an unarguable great free tool, that I'm sure everyone on this forum has used to a greater or less extent, I'd like to thank hdm and team for the work that has gone into the project so far. I'm pleased to see the hard work is paying off.
Logged

impelse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 565


View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: October 21, 2009, 05:03:22 PM »

Most of the successfull open sources that were bought for profits companies they became commercially, int the beginning the says: We will keep the open source project but later the change, etc, etc, etc.

They always said: Market required us to do this changes..........
Logged

CCNA, Security+, 70-290, 70-291
CCNA Security
Taking Hackingdojo training

Website: http://blog.thehost1.com/
sgt_mjc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 294


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2009, 12:42:39 PM »

I would like the OpcodeDB to come back online. 

I would also like to see it not go the way of Nessus.  We'll have to watch and see.
Logged

Mike Conway
CISSP
CompTia Security +
C|EH
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.109 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.