Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 37 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Network Pen Testingarrow SYN Flooding DOS Attack
EH-Net
May 25, 2013, 10:38:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SYN Flooding DOS Attack  (Read 7261 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Manu Zacharia (-M-)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 393


c0c0n Hacking Conference - where hackers unite


View Profile WWW
« on: July 07, 2006, 12:55:02 PM »

Hi Friends,

I am posting more questions that I have faced during my course. Please discuss the same. The next question is:

Quote
What TCP/IP Vulnerability does the SYN Flooding DOS Attack exploit?

1.   There is no limit to the number of connections possible on a host.
2.   Connection Establishment is a very cumbersome process.
3.   There are an unlimited number of IP addresses possible.
4.   The target computer has limited bandwidth.
5.   TCP/IP cannot handle SYN data packets.

Regards,

The Morpheus
« Last Edit: September 25, 2006, 10:11:57 PM by The Morpheus » Logged

Manu Zacharia
MVP (Enterprise Security), ISLA-2010 (ISC)², C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCP,
Certified ISO 27001:2005 Lead Auditor

There are 3 roads to spoil; women, gambling & hacking. The most pleasant with women, the quickest with gambling, but the surest is hacking - c0c0n
Dengar13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2006, 01:59:42 PM »

What do you think the answer is?
Logged

A+, Net+, MCP, CEH
MCSE: Security/Messaging
MCSA: Security/Messaging
Former U.S. Marine and damn proud of it!
Negrita
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 299



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2006, 03:05:08 PM »

Dengar is right. We aren't here to do your homework for you. If you're going to post questions you may at the very least post which answer you think is corect and why. I'm sure that the members here will be more than obliging in correcting you if you make a mistake.

BTW, I'd go for answer no. 2. This question is very easy and deals with basic understanding of TCP/IP. If you don't feel comfortable with the study material perhaps you should defer your exam until you've done some revision.
Logged

CEH, CCSA NG/AI, NNCSS, MCP, MCSA 2003

There are 10 kinds of people, those that understand binary, and those that don't.
pcsneaker
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 73


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2006, 04:34:49 AM »

The only answer which would make at least a bit sense is 4. - DOS attacks always deals with limited resources but SynFlooding is not really using bandwith but the limited capability of a host to handle connections.

I would say all these answers are a bit odd...
Logged

MCSA:Security (W2k, W2k3)
MCSE:Security (W2k, W2k3)
CPTS, Network+
LSOChris
Guest
« Reply #4 on: July 30, 2006, 09:51:38 PM »

either 2 or 4, i would probably choose 2 since a SYN Flood has nothing to do with a host's bandwidth per say but is an attack on the OS to keep up with the SYN requests  and the ACK's back.  but i could see 4 being an option that could be considered correct depending on how you look at it.

crappyily worded question either way
Logged
Hug_It
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2006, 02:01:33 PM »

It is poorly written but that's common to a lot of testing questions. CISSP comes to mind. =)

Are they saying it's a vulnerability in the TCP/IP standard or how different OSes implement it in their stacks? An arguement could be made that the answer is 1. Being the standard doesn't limit the number of connections that can be attempted to a host, this allows for SYN packets to overload the stack.
Logged

CISSP
oleDB
Recruiters
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 236



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2006, 02:14:17 PM »

I would have to say the answer is 4.

The TCP connection process isn't cumbersome SYN/SYNACK/ACK, thats it. Yeah its not a simple as UDP, but really its not "cumbersome" for an enduser in anyway.

Question 4 states bandwidth, however doesn't specifically say network bandwidth. While not completely generic you could interpret that in several ways. In the broadest sense, a given computer only has enough bandwidth to support so many half open connections before it can't take anymore. I would also tend to believe that network bandwidth is directly relevant, as an attacking computer with huge pipe, will overwhelm a target machine with smaller pipe very easily, even though it doesn't take that many packets to create a SYN flood condition.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.054 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.