Home
Calendar
Certifications
Columns
Features
Forum
Resources
Vitals
Latest Additions
April 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - eLearnSecurity
Human Intelligence to Navigate the Security Data Deluge
February 2013 Free Giveaway Winner of SANS CyberCon Training
Interview: Bugcrowd Founders on Herding Ninjas for Crowdsourced Bug Bounties
Network Forensics: The Tree in the Forest
March 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - Mile2
Book Review: Violent Python
February 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - SANS
Holiday 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of Metasploit Pro by Rapid7
Course Review: SANS FOR408 Computer Forensic Investigations – Windows In-Depth
The Security Consulting Sugar High
Tutorial: Fun with SMB on the Command Line
Interview: Ilia Kolochenko, CEO of High-Tech Bridge
October 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of LearningGate Training
The Broken: Assessing Corporate Security in 2012 to Make a Better 2013
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Lost Password?
No account yet?
Register
Who's Online
We have 37 guests online
You are here:
Home
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
Network Pen Testing
SYN Flooding DOS Attack
EH-Net
May 25, 2013, 10:38:52 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine
Home Page
Home
Help
Calendar
Login
Register
EH-Net
>
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
>
Network Pen Testing
(Moderator:
don
) >
SYN Flooding DOS Attack
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: SYN Flooding DOS Attack (Read 7261 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Manu Zacharia (-M-)
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 393
c0c0n Hacking Conference - where hackers unite
SYN Flooding DOS Attack
«
on:
July 07, 2006, 12:55:02 PM »
Hi Friends,
I am posting more questions that I have faced during my course. Please discuss the same. The next question is:
Quote
What TCP/IP Vulnerability does the SYN Flooding DOS Attack exploit?
1. There is no limit to the number of connections possible on a host.
2. Connection Establishment is a very cumbersome process.
3. There are an unlimited number of IP addresses possible.
4. The target computer has limited bandwidth.
5. TCP/IP cannot handle SYN data packets.
Regards,
The Morpheus
«
Last Edit: September 25, 2006, 10:11:57 PM by The Morpheus
»
Logged
Manu Zacharia
MVP (Enterprise Security), ISLA-2010 (ISC)², C|EH, C|HFI, CCNA, MCP,
Certified ISO 27001:2005 Lead Auditor
There are 3 roads to spoil; women, gambling & hacking. The most pleasant with women, the quickest with gambling, but the surest is hacking - c0c0n
Dengar13
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 380
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #1 on:
July 07, 2006, 01:59:42 PM »
What do you think the answer is?
Logged
A+, Net+, MCP, CEH
MCSE: Security/Messaging
MCSA: Security/Messaging
Former U.S. Marine and damn proud of it!
Negrita
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 299
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #2 on:
July 07, 2006, 03:05:08 PM »
Dengar is right. We aren't here to do your homework for you. If you're going to post questions you may at the very least post which answer you think is corect and why. I'm sure that the members here will be more than obliging in correcting you if you make a mistake.
BTW, I'd go for answer no. 2. This question is very easy and deals with basic understanding of TCP/IP. If you don't feel comfortable with the study material perhaps you should defer your exam until you've done some revision.
Logged
CEH, CCSA NG/AI, NNCSS, MCP, MCSA 2003
There are 10 kinds of people, those that understand binary, and those that don't.
pcsneaker
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 73
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #3 on:
July 08, 2006, 04:34:49 AM »
The only answer which would make at least a bit sense is 4. - DOS attacks always deals with limited resources but SynFlooding is not really using bandwith but the limited capability of a host to handle connections.
I would say all these answers are a bit odd...
Logged
MCSA:Security (W2k, W2k3)
MCSE:Security (W2k, W2k3)
CPTS, Network+
LSOChris
Guest
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #4 on:
July 30, 2006, 09:51:38 PM »
either 2 or 4, i would probably choose 2 since a SYN Flood has nothing to do with a host's bandwidth per say but is an attack on the OS to keep up with the SYN requests and the ACK's back. but i could see 4 being an option that could be considered correct depending on how you look at it.
crappyily worded question either way
Logged
Hug_It
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 28
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #5 on:
July 31, 2006, 02:01:33 PM »
It is poorly written but that's common to a lot of testing questions. CISSP comes to mind. =)
Are they saying it's a vulnerability in the TCP/IP standard or how different OSes implement it in their stacks? An arguement could be made that the answer is 1. Being the standard doesn't limit the number of connections that can be attempted to a host, this allows for SYN packets to overload the stack.
Logged
CISSP
oleDB
Recruiters
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 236
Re: SYN Flooding DOS Attack - AFCEH Question
«
Reply #6 on:
July 31, 2006, 02:14:17 PM »
I would have to say the answer is 4.
The TCP connection process isn't cumbersome SYN/SYNACK/ACK, thats it. Yeah its not a simple as UDP, but really its not "cumbersome" for an enduser in anyway.
Question 4 states bandwidth, however doesn't specifically say network bandwidth. While not completely generic you could interpret that in several ways. In the broadest sense, a given computer only has enough bandwidth to support so many half open connections before it can't take anymore. I would also tend to believe that network bandwidth is directly relevant, as an attacking computer with huge pipe, will overwhelm a target machine with smaller pipe very easily, even though it doesn't take that many packets to create a SYN flood condition.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
EH-Net
-----------------------------
=> Calendar Of Events
===> ChicagoCon 2007
===> ChicagoCon 2008s
===> ChicagoCon 2008f
===> ChicagoCon 2009s
=> Ethical Hacktivism
=> News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
===> Greetings
=> Special Events
-----------------------------
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
-----------------------------
=> General Certification
===> Networking
===> OS
===> Security
=> Compliance, Regulations & Standards
=> Control Systems
=> Cyber Warfare
=> Forensics
===> CCE / MCCE - (Master) Certified Computer Examiner
===> CHFI - Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator
===> EnCE - EnCase® Certified Examiner
===> GCFA - GIAC Certified Forensics Analyst
=> Hardware
=> Incident Response
===> CSIH - Computer Security Incident Handler
===> GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
=> Malware
===> Advisories
=> Mobile
=> Network Pen Testing
===> CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker
===> CPTC - Certified Penetration Testing Consultant
===> CPTE - Certified Penetration Testing Engineer
===> CSTA - Certified Security Testing Associate
===> eCPPT - eLearnSecurity Certified Professional Penetration Tester
===> ECSA - EC-Council Certified Security Analyst
===> GPEN - GIAC Certified Penetration Tester
===> OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
=> Physical Security
=> Programming
=> Social Engineering
=> Web Applications
=> Wireless
===> CWNP Certs
===> GAWN - GIAC Assessing Wireless Networks
===> OSWP - Offensive Security Wireless Professional
=> Other
-----------------------------
Columns
-----------------------------
=> Editor-In-Chief
=> Andress
=> Gates
=> Haddix
=> Hadnagy
=> Heffner
=> Hoffman
=> Linn
=> RichM
=> Murray
=> J. Peltier
=> Weidman
=> Wilson
-----------------------------
Features
-----------------------------
=> /root
=> Book Reviews
=> Opinions
=> Skillz
===> Examples
===> May 06 - Star Hacks, Episode V: The Empire Hacks Back
===> July 06 - Hack Bill!
===> Sept 06 - Netcat in the Hat
===> Nov 06 - Hitch-Hackers Guide to the Galaxy
===> Dec 06 - A Christmas (Hacking) Story
===> Feb 07 - Charlottes Web Site
===> April 07 - Microsoft Office Space
===> June 07 - Serenity Hack
===> Oct 07 - Worst. Ethical. Hacker. Challenge. Ever.
===> Dec 07 - Frosty the Snow Crash
===> March 2008 - It Happened One Friday
===> Oct 2008 - Scooby Doo and the Crypto Caper
===> Dec 08 - Santa Claus Is Hacking to Town
===> Feb 2009 - Brady Bunch Boondoggle
===> July 2009 - Prison Break
===> October 2009 - SSHliders
===> December 2009 - Miracle on Thirty-Hack Street
===> December 2010 - The Nightmare Before Charlie Browns Christmas
-----------------------------
Resources
-----------------------------
=> Career Central
===> Looking For Work
===> Looking To Hire
=> Links to cool sites.
=> Mass Media
=> News from the Outside World
=> Tools
=> Tutorials
===> Tutorial Requests
Loading...
Exclusive Deal
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22
5% Off
w/ Code
:
EHN_5
SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF
Any
SANS Course
in Any Format!
Coupon Code:
EHN_5
Including
SANS Rocky Mountain 2013
&
SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
Great!
Better.
About the same.
Little worse.
FUBAR!
Recent Forum Topics
News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
: Change is Coming to EH-Net!!
(30) by
don
Tools
: Symbolic Exploit Assistant project is looking for collaborators
(0) by
galapag0
Greetings
: Hi from the UK
(5) by
prats84
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: Passed my GCIH
(9) by
prats84
Network Pen Testing
: Want a challenge? Want a GXPN practice exam?
(0) by
ajohnson
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: GCIH Free Practice test attempt
(1) by
prats84
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
Privacy Notice
for TDCC & All Properties
© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla!
is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.