Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 52 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Incident Responsearrow SIEM and incident response
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 03:13:44 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: SIEM and incident response  (Read 24204 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
munch137
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


View Profile
« on: August 28, 2009, 04:06:08 PM »

Has anyone had experience in utilizing their SIEM solution as part of incident response? I'm looking for systems that go beyond SEM and log aggregation/archiving. Something like MARS, eIQ, QRadar, ArcSight, etc... Comment on ease of use, time it saved, etc.  I'm trying to build business cases for SIEM for customers under PCI and GLBA.
Logged

MCSD, CISSP, OSCP - I just hacked your computer and ate all your cookies
Dengar13
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 380



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2009, 09:34:09 PM »

Have you researched any ROI documents from these solutions?  This may give some hard facts as well.  Also, you may want to ask a third-party vendor(s) for this information as well since they probably have a vast amount of customers that have bast information with them.
Logged

A+, Net+, MCP, CEH
MCSE: Security/Messaging
MCSA: Security/Messaging
Former U.S. Marine and damn proud of it!
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2009, 11:45:17 PM »

I use it MARS and I like it. The real advantage is being able to quickly find potential incidents and the associated events. I don't have any ROI numbers or anything but it saves me a LOT of time.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
Salvalagio
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 02, 2010, 02:06:39 PM »

Hi there,
to really go beyond, start thinking about create rules that can say something to your company. Something like: If you could generate incidents from diferent logs and prove a fraud by combining them, you are in the right path. But always keep in mind to be focused where your company does the money or loose the money.
From there you can attract managers and directors attention. I've done this way and now everytime we detect an incident we are heard.
And no matter wich tool you choose to be your SIEM, the response quality is the object to be achieved.
As an example: If you get hit by a DDOS, your SIEM will not be able to handle so much trafic logs from the firewall and the same will happen to your IPS/IDS. But if you can say: we are loosing money, because I got multiple logins to our sales portal using the same userid/password and the responsible for this userid was fired 3 months ago.
This will attract their attention for sure!
Logged
crossover
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2010, 03:28:06 PM »

Well I use Envision and Arc Sight. I would say Arc Sight is far better product than any other SIEM in the Market ( you should check with arc sight for various tools/appliance they offer  But it has to depend lot on your company budget and needs.

SIEM gives you a true picture of how your network is being used, and by whom. It independently monitors your network to verify security policies, to generate alerts for possible compliance breaches, and to analyze and report on network performance. There are 3 core areas.

1 ) Simplying Compliance – Produce targeted compliance reports for regulations
    and internal policy
2) Enhancing Security – Perform real time alerting analyze security incidents.  
    Conduct detailed forensic    analysis.
3) Optimizing IT & Network Operations – Monitor and identify issues across a
    wide range of IT Components

Logged
sil
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 549



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2010, 07:08:18 AM »

Has anyone had experience in utilizing their SIEM solution as part of incident response? I'm looking for systems that go beyond SEM and log aggregation/archiving. Something like MARS, eIQ, QRadar, ArcSight, etc... Comment on ease of use, time it saved, etc.  I'm trying to build business cases for SIEM for customers under PCI and GLBA.

I'm a big fan of OSSIM which uses a slew of open source tools, Snort, Nagios, OpenVAS, etc., and one of the main reasons why I like it is that you could easily program slash tailor it to do what you need it do it unlike other closed source (Windows) applications. With that said, SIEM for incident response means little if your staff isn't vigilant on monitoring what is going on. For example, let's imagine a new 0day on the market. Most SIEM's, IDS' (which are the core of SIEM anyway), IPS, etc., won't have the proper signatures to detect what is going on. An event will solely be an anomaly. Is your staff vigilant enough to investigate further?

With OSSIM, SIEM goes a little further in my opinion. Not only are you capable of the typical "assessments" you can use it to alert yourself and tailor responses. E.g.: If EventA then Perform ActionB it's all a matter of know how and this could be said for most SIEM's to a degree. I so happen to like OSSIM because of its *nix based root. This allows me to do things like create ssh session keys, create rules on the fly and have those rules pushed to other machines.
Logged

Agoonie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 176



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2010, 10:30:20 AM »

Has anyone ever used the SIEM (NitroView Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)) or QRadar?  It seems like SIEM can help get an organization SAS70 certified.  It was noted that "SIEM gives you a true picture of how your network is being used, and by whom. It independently monitors your network to verify security policies, to generate alerts for possible compliance breaches, and to analyze and report on network performance" but has it ever overwhelmed anyone here with false positives?
Logged

OSCE, OSCP, OSWP, CISSP, GPEN

www.agoonie.com
malvara
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 07, 2010, 05:39:07 PM »

I've actually looked at a couple of solutions including ArcSight and RSA.  They both have similar capabilities, but the downside to both of these is the cost.  I'm currently testing out a vendor named HAWK Security Network Defense which has the same, if not more custom/correlating capabilities.  One of my friends referred me to them.  So far I've been pleased with their proof of concept, and price wise, they're not event half of what the others cost.  Hope this helps. 
Logged
Dark_Knight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 292


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2010, 06:27:28 PM »

Anyone have experience with LogRhythm? Or has anyone tried to "retrofit" Splunk into behaving like a SIEM?
Logged

CEH, OSCP, GPEN, GWAPT, GCIA
http://sector876.blogspot.com
ziggy_567
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 361


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2010, 08:33:51 AM »

Splunk is great!

I use Splunk daily. It is very intuitive once you get it installed and running. I am still running version 3 b/c you don't get alerts with the free version of 4.*, so what I am about to say may not be the case with the most up to date version, but it can be a little slow depending on your configuration. I have Splunk reading roughly 1200-2000 files worth of syslog data, and it takes anywhere from 5 mintues to 20 minutes for an event to show up in the interface. So, its not "real-time" and it doesn't do correlation like ArcSight, but its a great option if you don't have the money that ArcSight costs...
Logged

--
Ziggy


eCPPT - GSEC - GCIH - GCUX - RHCE - SCSecA - Security+ - Network+
pseud0
Recruiters
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 208



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2010, 08:12:34 PM »

Just an observation for the folks that are debating between the tools that are commonly viewed as the top tier (Arcsight, envision, etc) and "the others".  The top tier systems will be costly out of the box, but if your organization doesn't have heavy technically skilled resources in house it might be worth it.  The platform vendors spend a significant amount of time and energy trying to make their systems "plug and play".  They'll have modules/plug-ins that will make them work with most conceivable devices (OSs, network devices, vulnerability scanners, GRC, etc) so they are easier to roll out and maintain.  The "other" systems can be just as capable and powerful, but they can be a bit more involved in getting fully deployed and functional especially in large enterprise environments.  For organizations that have the proper staff this can be feasible, but for folks that try to do SIEM on the cheap with a staff of security generalists they can be playing with fire.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2010, 08:14:50 PM by pseud0 » Logged

CISSP, CISM, CISA, GCIH, GREM, CEH, HMFIC, KTHXBIROFLCOPTER
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.083 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.