Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 32 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Malwarearrow Symantec to Introduce Reputation-Based Security
EH-Net
May 25, 2013, 10:01:33 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Symantec to Introduce Reputation-Based Security  (Read 4501 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4169


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: July 01, 2009, 11:02:46 AM »

Quote

Information gathered under Symantec's Community Watch program will be used in Norton Antivirus 2010 and will eventually make its way into enterprise products

Symantec is to use the 'wisdom of the crowds' and introduce reputation-based security in the next version of its Norton Antivirus 2010 product.

The software, due out at the end of August, the company will be using information gathered under its Community Watch program.

Gerry Egan, Symantec product management director said that the problem that the company faced was that the old way of checking for anti-viruses was inefficient. "There are two approaches: blacklisting works well with files that you know are bad, and whitelisting, which works well with files that are known to be good -- but these don't work so well in the middle -- it was clear that we needed a new model."

Egan said that since 2007, Symantec had been working on the idea that the wisdom of the crowds would fill the gap

"We already use this approach for things likes books, music and films, we're happy to be guided by other people's opinions. We're using a variant of that." He added that Symantec didn't ask the individual users themselves. "To a user it's not obvious what is safe: Some threats are silent, sometimes the user doesn't know they're there, some threats infect legitimate process while other threats pretend to be legitimate."

He said that this reputation-based approach worked by constantly surveying the data being gathered from users without any need for human interaction. "We've devised our own algorithm within Symantec that takes the data from the 30 million users who have signed up to Community Watch and calculates whether every individual program is safe or not," said Egan.

Obviously, there will be new files that we'd be unsure about but we have an arrangement with reputable publishers to pre-approve their software. "For example," said Egan, "Adobe could release a new program next week but they'd be on the approved list of publishers," he said.

Egan said that this reputation-based approach would be used in consumer products first but would eventually make it into enterprises. He thought the new release would move Symantec ahead of its competitors and, more importantly, ahead of the bad guys.

" I think it will be harder for the bad guys to beat this. We think this will keep us ahead for some time."


Original story:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/security-central/symantec-introduce-reputation-based-security-389

Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
LSOChris
Guest
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2009, 04:32:25 PM »

interesting approach for massively distributed malware but seems like some custom targeted malware with a small distribution will still be ok.
« Last Edit: July 08, 2009, 07:19:30 PM by ChrisG » Logged
former33t
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 226


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2009, 09:09:43 PM »

I'll be interested to see how this works in practice.  I think it's more marketing hype than anything else.  There are too many false conclusions to be drawn from shareware that is installed on ~50 or so machines that also happen to be infected (apart from the shareware).  What then?  Can you imagine the outcry when Symantec AV deletes the boss's new shareware gadget that was NOT malware?  There's also a legal liability to getting this wrong.  I'm sure the lawyers have carefully drafted something to limit their liability, but I still believe they'll err so far on the side of caution with this that it will be practically useless.
Logged

Certifications: CREA, MCSE: Security, CCNA, Security+, other junk
Bane
Guest
« Reply #3 on: August 17, 2009, 09:58:46 AM »

Once again, Symantec follows instead of leading. McAfee has had this technology for awhile with their Artemis technology, as have Secure Computing with Trusted Source, and Ironport.  It doesn't sound like they have come up with any innovations here, howeverit will be interesting to see.
Logged
UNIX
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2009, 01:00:54 AM »

Sounds interesting, but I still think that av-software will in some terms change its methods in detecting malware drastically in future. Though I am not sure how it will be done, I don't think that signature based detection will protect one from some of the stronger malware. Same applies to heuristic methods in my opinion.

Looking forward to coming techniques in this sector.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.109 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.