Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 29 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Physical Securityarrow Bomb Parts Smuggled into 10 Federal Buildings During Test
EH-Net
May 24, 2013, 11:46:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Bomb Parts Smuggled into 10 Federal Buildings During Test  (Read 19007 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4168


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: July 08, 2009, 10:49:24 AM »

Quote

Story Highlights
- Plainclothes investigators test security at 10 federal buildings in 4 U.S. cities
- GAO agents able to assemble components in restrooms, freely enter offices
- GAO's report questions effectiveness of the Federal Protective Service
- Sen. Susan Collins: Security lapses show "poor training, lax management" at FPS

By Mike M. Ahlers
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Plainclothes investigators sent to test security at federal buildings in four U.S. cities were successful in smuggling bomb components through guard posts at all 10 of the sites they visited, according to a government report.

The investigators then assembled the bombs in restrooms and freely entered numerous government offices while carrying the devices in briefcases, the report said.

The buildings contained offices of several federal lawmakers as well as agencies within the departments of State, Justice and Homeland Security, which is responsible for safeguarding federal office buildings.

CNN obtained the report late Tuesday, ahead of its expected release Wednesday at a hearing of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, conducted the tests to check on the effectiveness of the Federal Protective Service .The FPS protects federal buildings by having about 1,200 federal law enforcement officers oversee an army of 13,000 private security guards.

In a videotape obtained by CNN, a covert GAO inspector places a bag containing bomb components on an X-ray machine conveyor belt and then walks through a magnetometer at an unidentified federal building. Unlike some covert tests that use simulated explosives, the GAO used actual bomb components in the test and publicly available information "to identify a type of device that a terrorist could use" to damage a building.


For complete story:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/07/federal.buildings.security/index.html

Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: July 08, 2009, 11:26:42 AM »

WOW, that's worrying but somehow not that surprising. Thanks for the heads up

I'm guessing some heads will roll from this.
Logged

don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4168


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: July 08, 2009, 12:25:00 PM »

Heads are already rolling with many politicians weighing in on the issue. You can see a few of them in the full article.

Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
former33t
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 226


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 08, 2009, 12:43:22 PM »

None of this is surprising.  Especially the part about contract security.

Quote
The FPS protects federal buildings by having about 1,200 federal law enforcement officers oversee an army of 13,000 private security guards.

I worked on a military base for years and I can cite the night and day difference between sworn officers and contract security.  I consistently saw no accountability for contract security personnel screwing off on the job.  Not that federal employees are all that great, but they always performed head and shoulders above the contract security (even the armed contract security).  I regularly saw the contract security standing around BS'ing at the gate and having to wait for a guard to pay attention to you to check your ID before driving your vehicle onto the base.  The guard in the CNN article shown sleeping is absolutely reminicent of what I've seen.
Logged

Certifications: CREA, MCSE: Security, CCNA, Security+, other junk
UNIX
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2009, 01:26:09 AM »

I enjoyed reading this as it demonstrates again (and certainly not for the first time) that security is not treated seriously, unfortunately.

Some people working in such buildings, e.g. lawyers and justice, are often aware of the fact that their life could be in danger for whatever reasons. Considering that they are protected from some sort of guards or other security protections, they may feel more secure but it is quite bad when the people who should protect are sleeping (although this can't be applied for everyone; there are certainly people who take their job serious).

I think it is really important to do such tests, even if it results in rolling heads. Better bogus rolling heads than real ones.

Logged
BillV
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1892


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2009, 12:30:43 PM »

Yeah, received an email (below) here at work the other day about this. Luckily, it didn't happen here (not that the outcome would probably be any different). I'm still waiting to see if they give us more info...

Quote
Recently, CNN released an article concerning an exercise of planting mock devices in Federal Buildings. The [building I work in] was not part of this exercise.  A critique of this exercise is forthcoming.  If more information is received via the Safety Office, it will be published through this and OEP Channels.
Logged
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: July 14, 2009, 05:44:09 PM »

Realistically how could you stop this? Most of the components are wires and electrical bits, how do you distiguish that from computer or other electrical equipment? If you want it past security just jam it in a laptop case and you are through.

The key part is stopping the explosive, but an XRay machine isn't going to do you any good. They need an explosive detection system (EDS) to really be effective in this arena, the XRay and metal detector is just going to stop guns and knives.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
Ants
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 14, 2009, 06:01:17 PM »

timmedin, what you need are some trained Bees,  http://www.techchee.com/2007/09/16/bees-can-be-trained-to-sniff-out-explosivesperhaps-drugs-too/. I remember seeing this way back and thinking that it was cool.
Logged

CEH, GPEN, GCFW
former33t
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 226


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2009, 09:14:31 PM »

This isn't about trained bees or the commonality of bomb parts (minus the explosives).  The point is that security at most government facilities is ridiculously lax.

CNN/other media may be trying to sensationalize this, but the point is that many security guards (particularly contract personnel) are less than vigilant.  Some are just lazy.  This is true across all professions, but a lazy burger flipper results in some overdone beef.  I think we all know what happens when government security drops the ball.
Logged

Certifications: CREA, MCSE: Security, CCNA, Security+, other junk
UNIX
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1235


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2009, 12:25:32 AM »

Haven't heard about such bees but that is definitely interesting. Smiley

As already stated I think one of the major problems are within humas. However, I can hardly imagine that it would be impossible to smuggle somehow needed devices into a secured building.
Logged
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: July 18, 2009, 09:48:54 AM »

timmedin, what you need are some trained Bees

If I had some trained bees I would use them to take over the world! Muhahahaha!
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
alucian
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 225



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2009, 01:06:35 AM »

Isn't this investigation a little bit exagerated??
Logged

CISSP ISSAP, CISM/A, GWAPT, GCIH, eCPPT, OSWP
Tails502
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2010, 08:55:07 AM »

I enjoyed reading this as it demonstrates again (and certainly not for the first time) that security is not treated seriously, unfortunately.

Some people working in such buildings, e.g. lawyers and justice, are often aware of the fact that their life could be in danger for whatever reasons. Considering that they are protected from some sort of guards or other security protections, they may feel more secure but it is quite bad when the people who should protect are sleeping (although this can't be applied for everyone; there are certainly people who take their job serious).

I think it is really important to do such tests, even if it results in rolling heads. Better bogus rolling heads than real ones.



i'm currently working contract security, and durring the orientation we were told flat out "since 9/11 the chances of an attack have risen alarmingly, only through vigilance can we possibly spot a potential threat" they also after that little speach told us "if your caught sleeping you will be terminated on the spot" they dont want the 'minimum wage security guard' sleeping at his post as most movies and some news articles portray, though i do agree that government security has gotten a little if you'll pardon the term "half-assed" everyone at the company that i work for takes their jobs seriously, and make a vigilant attempt to spot potential threats, we also got training on what to do shuld we come across an explosive device, back away, cordon off, and call the police emergancy number from a land line (DO NOT! use Cellular phones if you suspect a device), but i digress, it is an eye opener that they were able to smuggle Live explosives and material into the offices of several federal buildings, we do need to wake up to this very real threat, but thats just my .02 Shocked
Logged

A+, studying CEH
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.115 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.