Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 48 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Forensicsarrow Intellectual Inquiry on Conficker.C
EH-Net
May 24, 2013, 10:14:17 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Intellectual Inquiry on Conficker.C  (Read 4338 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Blindeyed
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« on: April 08, 2009, 06:46:23 AM »

Hi, i wanted to do a Intellectual Inquiry and ask if any of you have an idea of what kind of person the Author of Conficker may be. Anyone tried an analyst of the conflicker worm themselves?  I am willing to admit I am NOT a hacker but rather a person who does enjoy Information gathering and processing. A social engineer if you want to say that.

PS. I am not after Massivesofts 250k bounty on this person. I'm simply someone who enjoys a cup of tea and a good intellectual conversation

Logged
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2009, 07:48:58 AM »

Could the author of Conficker be the sort of person that pops up on a forum and asks for other's opinion of said author? You've got my paranoid streak working Wink

Interesting question, welcome to the community

[P.S. and from 'cup of tea' I'd guess English?...]
Logged

Blindeyed
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2009, 08:01:58 AM »

Could the author of Conficker be the sort of person that pops up on a forum and asks for other's opinion of said author? You've got my paranoid streak working Wink

Interesting question, welcome to the community

[P.S. and from 'cup of tea' I'd guess English?...]

Actually No, I have little to no programming skills. Last time i actually dealed with a basic form of programming was back when HTML was done on notepad and dealing with DOS command prompt.

Anyways, i gathered this much from my understanding of this whole Conficker worm scare about the person

- Seems to be a showboating hacker (given that the thing was set to go off on April 1, 2009 and didn't actually connect with any master computer)

- Used a specific security hole that was in a sense his/her calling card.

- The worm has major evolutionary changes done in new strains.

- Is exceptionally skilled based on how it spreads and secures itself into a system.
Logged
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2009, 08:19:09 AM »

Actually No

That's a shame, I could do with $250k Cheesy

Afraid social and psychology aren't my field, I've got no real idea on my thoughts for motive etc. but personally I've got the feeling that this is a (large) collection of authors rather than he usual solo/small team efforts I would normally associate with malcode authors.

I keep wondering if the author(s) have gained more notoriety than expected and are going for the ostrich approach. But then new versions keep popping up...

I'm with the rest of the industry, looking forward to finding out.
Logged

Blindeyed
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2009, 09:39:21 AM »

personally I've got the feeling that this is a (large) collection of authors rather than he usual solo/small team efforts I would normally associate with malcode authors.

I keep wondering if the author(s) have gained more notoriety than expected and are going for the ostrich approach. But then new versions keep popping up...

I'm with the rest of the industry, looking forward to finding out.

I don't mean to prod but usually when its a large collection of authors its usually means that theres a overall group motive such as information theft. I mean it is plausable considering that the strains are done so quickly but at the same time for a large group to have done this thing and not get any kind of valuable information from the infected pcs it seems inconsistent with the programming of the worm. of course the whole April 1, 2009 dud seemed like  a classic act of showboating. I mean honestly, this thing was designed for massive information gathering and yet of all the days to go online April 1,2009 was picked. Major computer security companies that make anti-viral software were shaken then all of a sudden nothing. No boom. I mean to me it just seems like a facade. As you said new versions are continually popping up and yet they still can't find this or these authors.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.073 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.