Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 42 guests and 1 member online
 
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

You are here: Home arrow Resourcesarrow News from the Outside Worldarrow BBC rents it's own botnet and brags about it....
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 07:26:26 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: BBC rents it's own botnet and brags about it....  (Read 11010 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
NickFnord
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 117



View Profile WWW
« on: March 12, 2009, 10:01:02 AM »

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/click_online/7932816.stm

Quote
The technology programme Click has demonstrated just how at risk PCs are of being taken over by hackers.

Almost 22,000 computers made up Click's network of hijacked machines, which has now been disabled.

The BBC has now warned users that their PCs are infected, and advised them on how to make their systems more secure.

I'm absolutely speachless......  regardless of intent, this is still very illegal.

« Last Edit: March 12, 2009, 10:35:58 AM by NickFnord » Logged
doodleface
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 34



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2009, 10:29:27 AM »

I am also speechless and in agreement to the above statement, though they did not create this botnet, they stumbled upon the botnet during a cyber crime investigation in an underground hacker forum, yet that is what it is allegedly stated so who can say.
Logged

CISSP, OSCP, C|EH, E|CSA, C|HFI, GXPN, GWAPT, GCIH, GISP, GSEC, MCITP:EA, CCNA, FCT, FCNSP, JNCIA, JNCIA-FWV, MCSE Security, A+, Net+, Server+, Security+
NickFnord
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 117



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2009, 10:35:36 AM »

yeah, sorry - I got the subject line wrong.....  will edit it.
Logged
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2009, 11:41:05 AM »

The UK is becoming scary!

Police set to step up hacking of home PCs
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5439604.ece
Quote
THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant.

...

The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
BillV
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1892


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2009, 04:01:04 PM »

There's another thread here somewhere on that same topic (above post, not original).

Don't they teach not to do that in just about every security class? I can't remember taking/listening to a security class on hacking and not hearing "don't go around breaking into peoples stuff and using it as an example to teach them about security."

Quote
if this exercise had been done with criminal intent it would be breaking the law

Wow! So what is that saying, as long as I don't have any actual "criminal intent," it's ok for me to go around doing what otherwise would be illegal activities? Ridiculous...

BillV
Logged
Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2009, 04:10:10 PM »

The UK is becoming scary!

Police set to step up hacking of home PCs
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article5439604.ece
Quote
THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant.

...

The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room.

I think that this is another example of poor choice of words.   Hacking sounds scary, installing keyloggers is something cops do on a day to day basis, including in the USA.   Sniffing wireless and malware are something new, but I think it was only a matter of time. 

In the USA, cops need a warrant to be able to install a keylogger.  Still, it's easy for someone to abuse this.

Regarding testing the waters with a botnet, that's a little silly.  It's really along the same lines of someone breaking into a home just to say that they can.   It doesn't matter if they took anything, it's still break and entering. 
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2009, 09:05:58 PM »

Was just reading about the BBC thing. There must be something in the water over there, they're just plain crazy. It like me killing someone, then saying that it was ok because I just did it for demonstration purposes.
Logged
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 13, 2009, 06:58:24 AM »

I'm interested to see how this plays out, there should be a police enquiry at the minimum. Funny how they are playing the 'no criminal intent' card, isn't this the same [unsuccessful] defense used by McKinnon? Don't think I can see a difference.

Think I've mentioned in other threads the opportunity found by the Tipping Point team during their analysis of Kraken and resulting debate. Think it says everything that the security researchers hold back on interfering with compromised machines whilst the journalists carry on regardless.

(but uk.gov will never take action against a large corporation, just another transgression in an ever growing list)
Logged

jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 15, 2009, 10:38:02 PM »

Some follow on articles to this:

http://www.scmagazineuk.com/BBC-Click-botnet-attack-criticised-by-industry-experts/article/128686/
http://www.scmagazineuk.com/BBC-may-face-legal-challenges-over-Click-programmes-hacking-feature/article/128741/
http://www.out-law.com/page-9863

From what I've read, it seems that most folks agree that they seem to have broken *some* law, but there's a bit of discussion at to exactly what that might be.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2009, 07:30:47 PM by jason » Logged
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2009, 04:20:07 PM »

What if Gary McKinnon worked for the BBC when he wanted to find out about UFOs? "Don't worry NASA, we were just looking for aliens"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/4977134.stm

Intent doesn't matter. Plain and simple, it was unauthorized access.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2009, 07:32:00 PM »

Intent doesn't matter. Plain and simple, it was unauthorized access.

Exactly so. They claim to have consulted with lawyers before doing this. I can't imagine a lawyer who would have advised them that this was ok.
Logged
Ketchup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1021



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2009, 09:24:05 PM »

I can't imagine a lawyer who would have advised them that this was ok.

Oh, there are some really incompetent lawyers out there.  Cheesy
Logged

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ketchup
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 469



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2009, 10:45:50 PM »

Intent doesn't matter. Plain and simple, it was unauthorized access.

Exactly so. They claim to have consulted with lawyers before doing this. I can't imagine a lawyer who would have advised them that this was ok.


It doesn't mean they followed the advice of the lawyer.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
tkennedy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2009, 12:56:13 AM »

Hi Guys,

Could anyone please tell me what the Botnet the BBC was using was called.. Cant seem to find that info any where. Was trying to establish if there was a detection for it by any of the major A/V vendors...


Tom

Logged
jason
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1012



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2009, 10:09:38 PM »

It was called Chimera. More info here:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=3045
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 22 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.