Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 42 guests online
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Forum arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Forensicsarrow Archiving files without changing the MAC timestamps
EH-Net
May 25, 2012, 04:30:31 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Advertise on EH-Net!! - Reasonable Rates, Highly Targeted Audience.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Archiving files without changing the MAC timestamps  (Read 3025 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
punkrokk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


View Profile
« on: February 18, 2009, 10:56:08 AM »

Hi,

So when I was at shmoocon, I was talking with some people about my thesis: Role Based File Archiving. The main problem I ran into with my research was that I couldn't find a good way to -- when archiving files -- to provide integrity or non-repudiation to the MAC timestamps (Modified, last Accessed, Created).

The above being said, my programmatic work around was to read the time stamps before copy, but then rewrite them after copy. The problem is that I don't want to have to do this, and this opens up a potential "weak link" in an archiving system especially in court if I can prove you can change the MAC stamps when archiving.

My question is: Does anyone know of a programatic way to archive files and folders in NTFS and ext3/4 that will truly archive the file (provide transparent archiving, for legal purposes... or just to know that it hasn't/can't be modified without an audit trail) for non-repudiation purposed and/or integrity purposes?

Thanks!

-=punkrokk=-
Logged

-=punkrokk=-
timmedin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 470



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2009, 08:29:39 PM »

I believe to provide non-repudiation with the timestamps you just have to prove that your software doesn't alter them and its output has to be reproducable. It might take a few court cases to prove it. Normal backups can be used and what you propose is essentially backup software.
Logged

twitter.com/timmedin | http://blog.securitywhole.com
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.247 seconds with 21 queries.
 

gk_static-ad_feb2012.jpg
Global Knowledge: Build Security Skills to Protect & Defend

els_130x200fixed2.gif
eLearnSecurity Student Course Now Live!
5% Off with Code
ELS-EH-5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
$150 OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_Connect Including SANS Security West 2012 & SANSFIRE 2012
Recent Forum Topics

cbtnuggets_logo_125.jpg
Try CBT Nuggets Free!

Vote For EH-Net

Add to Technorati Favorites
technorati fave

 
         
Advertisement

© 2012 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.