Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 52 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Resourcesarrow Tutorialsarrow problem with use MSF
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 11:08:46 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: problem with use MSF  (Read 20904 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
mr.Z
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 23, 2008, 05:23:21 AM »

now ok i'm using tftp
now i have laptop and scan using nmap
nmap -PN -p 445,21,135,139 192.168.1.1
say
Interesting ports on 192.168.1.1:
PORT    STATE    SERVICE
445/tcp filtered microsoft-ds
135/tcp filtered
.....
what can I do for this problem I want exploit this my os win
 
Logged
LSOChris
Guest
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2008, 08:01:06 AM »

you'll have to do a udp scan to see your open udp port :-)
Logged
mr.Z
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 27, 2008, 12:30:57 AM »

OK THANK YOU FOR MORE INFO

BUT I WANNA ASK YOU ABOUT TOOL NMAP IF I USING SCAN? IS SAFE I MEAN IF I SCAN SOME IP REG THIS ON SERVER REGISTER MY IP ON LOG SERVER OR WHAT ?

IF YOU HAVE PAR MITER  COMMAND FOR NMAP DON'T REGISTER ON LOG GIVE ME PLZ

like this

nmap -sS hostname

if i scan this SAFE or what?
Logged
jimbob
Guest
« Reply #18 on: November 27, 2008, 03:07:16 AM »

Using nmap is not safe, most scan will send packets to the target IP address. What the remote system does with these packets is up to them but logging, port scan detection and other techniques may be used to identify the scan.

Jimbob
Logged
mr.Z
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 27, 2008, 03:50:02 AM »

but somebody say if using this command is safe?

nmap -sS -O -v hostname

ok can tell me what solution
Logged
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 928



View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: November 27, 2008, 04:41:30 AM »

but somebody say if using this command is safe?

nmap -sS -O -v hostname

ok can tell me what solution

I'm a bit confused, what do you mean by 'safe'?
  • liable to crash the target?
  • liable to get you arrested?
  • liable to start world war 3?
  • ...

All (well ok most) depend on your hardware, target and situation.
Logged

xXxKrisxXx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 512



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 27, 2008, 11:09:27 AM »

I think he's trying to figure out what scan would be the noisiest and what scan would be safer to run without being logged. You should look into:
http://www.nmap-tutorial.com/
And download the Nmap Tutorial, PDF, I just gave it a quick read through it tells what parameters you could set in nmap to make it less detectable on hosts.
Logged

eCPPT, GCIH, OSCP, OSWP
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.079 seconds with 22 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.