Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 46 guests online
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Forum arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Malwarearrow Recent changes in SSH attacks
EH-Net
May 25, 2012, 02:39:07 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Advertise on EH-Net!! - Reasonable Rates, Highly Targeted Audience.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Recent changes in SSH attacks  (Read 5456 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 857



View Profile WWW
« on: December 08, 2008, 06:34:37 AM »

Multiple sources (for example: Arbor networks  blog and El Reg ) are reporting changes in SSH brute-force methodology to a distributed platform. I've seen this in my logs and monitoring since October as described by most of the sources, but I don't believe this is a entirely new concept as I saw similar events as far back as 2007.

Most sources are claiming that so far no-one has been able to obtain a copy of the attacking code for analysis. As this is banging on my front door fairly hard despite the protections in place (which are so far holding up well), if anyone gets their hands on a sample I'd appreciate a copy if possible. 'Know your enemy' etc.

My main thought though is; given the increase in DDoS and botnets, why hasn't someone implemented this sooner? And why do people seem surprised by the development?
Logged

jimbob
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2008, 01:55:42 PM »

I think one of the key reasons for the lack of drive behind SSH brute forcing is the ease of cracking and value of the targets. SSH runs on a large number of platforms, making automated pwnage and subsequent use harder. Own a windows box and you can run your DDoS/botnet tool without any fuss.

I imagine there are worm-like tools out there that exploit SSH, infect and continue scanning. I too would like to get my hands on the code, I find *nix malware a whole lot more interesting than Windows nasties.

Jimbob

Logged
pseud0
Recruiters
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 204



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2008, 05:10:29 PM »

I read through all of these articles as they've been showing up over the last few months, and as a response I started using knockd.  Check it out if you haven't seen it.  Basically you can set up a "secret knock" for your system before it will open the port in a listening mode.  It adds an extra layer of complexity on any bruteforce attack.
Logged

CISSP, CISM, CISA, GCIH, CEH, HMFIC, KTHXBIROFLCOPTER
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 857



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2008, 03:14:48 AM »

Pseud0,

hadn't seen knockd before, although I've come across the general idea before, might have to give it a look.

I run breakinguard, which is a simple automatic blacklisting utility. Worth a look for some general protection, and the reporting (email sent on blocked IP) is how we were alerted to the event originally.
Logged

Cr@sh
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2008, 08:43:23 AM »

Would this help at all?

http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~greg/sshdfilter/

Edit: I realize that this is for mac osX, I didnt know if you guys were refering to Mac or PC
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 08:45:07 AM by Cr@sh » Logged
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 857



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2008, 09:42:14 AM »

Cr@sh,

thanks for the link I'll take a look and run some tests. Looking at the sshdfilter it uses the same timed lockout mechanisms present in breakinguard solution. The problem is that the new attack pattern is designed to work around these protections by coming from a large number of distributed hosts, even if you block some of the attempts another source takes over the slack.

Looking at the source of sshdfilter it *should* compile on a Linux OS as well as OS X (Suse is listed in the README file) however there is a precompiled OS X binary available for download to ease installation.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.34 seconds with 23 queries.
 

gk_static-ad_feb2012.jpg
Global Knowledge: Build Security Skills to Protect & Defend

els_130x200fixed2.gif
eLearnSecurity Student Course Now Live!
5% Off with Code
ELS-EH-5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
$150 OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_Connect Including SANS Security West 2012 & SANSFIRE 2012
Recent Forum Topics

cbtnuggets_logo_125.jpg
Try CBT Nuggets Free!

Vote For EH-Net

Add to Technorati Favorites
technorati fave

 
         
Advertisement

© 2012 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.