Home
Calendar
Certifications
Columns
Features
Forum
Resources
Vitals
Latest Additions
April 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - eLearnSecurity
Human Intelligence to Navigate the Security Data Deluge
February 2013 Free Giveaway Winner of SANS CyberCon Training
Interview: Bugcrowd Founders on Herding Ninjas for Crowdsourced Bug Bounties
Network Forensics: The Tree in the Forest
March 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - Mile2
Book Review: Violent Python
February 2013 Free Giveaway Sponsor - SANS
Holiday 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of Metasploit Pro by Rapid7
Course Review: SANS FOR408 Computer Forensic Investigations – Windows In-Depth
The Security Consulting Sugar High
Tutorial: Fun with SMB on the Command Line
Interview: Ilia Kolochenko, CEO of High-Tech Bridge
October 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of LearningGate Training
The Broken: Assessing Corporate Security in 2012 to Make a Better 2013
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.
Username:
Password:
Remember me
Lost Password?
No account yet?
Register
Who's Online
We have 42 guests and 1 member online
You are here:
Home
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
Hardware
Cisco Security
EH-Net
May 23, 2013, 12:30:03 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine
Home Page
Home
Help
Calendar
Login
Register
EH-Net
>
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
>
Hardware
(Moderator:
don
) >
Cisco Security
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Cisco Security (Read 20968 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
scucci
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
Cisco Security
«
on:
September 26, 2008, 11:27:03 AM »
Currently we have multiple different hardware vendors performing all different parts of our layered security. Now that I think of it, we don't have more than one vendor performing security in every part of our network. (Firewalls, SIEM, antivirus, IPS, etc.)
I like Cisco and seeing what they can do with all areas of security running Cisco products is impressive. From your standpoint, would it be better to diversify the equipment to different vendors or have one manage them all. I know that Cisco might not be #1 in all categories, but when all their equipment is working together, I feel that you have a tighter network.
Scucci
Logged
dalepearson
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 357
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #1 on:
September 27, 2008, 04:33:50 PM »
I am sure many people will have many different opinions on this.
Cisco is for sure a good brand, with some quality products, and alot of companies are Cisco houses.
My personal opinion is where possible go for best of breed, and just not to put all your eggs in one basket. So I like to have a few solutions in the mix by different vendors. That way when a major issues flares up (some zero day attack) I will hopefully have some layer providing some protection.
Just my thoughts.
Logged
:: Subliminal Hacking ::
/
:: Security Active Blog ::
Andrew Waite
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 928
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #2 on:
September 28, 2008, 03:49:32 AM »
In part I'd agree with Dale.
Cisco are generally superior in what they do best, routing and switching. However, often the attempts to branch into different fields and features can leave a bit to be desired. They usually design and create devices with a high level of security, however it is often seen that the advanced 'features' are less secure.
For example this months security advisory lists several vulnerabilities in 'security' features; including vulnerable IPS features, potential data leakage from a VPN and even an issue with the humble NAT. (Full advisory
here
)
I'm not trying to claim that Cisco devices are less secure than other manufacturers, it could easily be the case competitors are just less
open
regarding their bugs; and if you want to move to a single manufacturer for all devices you could certainly do worse than go with Cisco.
It is usually the case though that those specialising in a specific technology will produce a better product than generalists, providing you stick to the big boys. Best-of-breed devices usually have that label for a reason.
Good luck out there...
Logged
--
http://www.infosanity.co.uk
--
http://blog.infosanity.co.uk
$w33p3R
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 30
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #3 on:
September 28, 2008, 04:45:11 AM »
I think Dale and RoleReversal summed up the majority of my opinion, other than, it is kind of like asking which is the best OS; MAC, Linux or Windows? You are gonna get so many answers it is rediculous. In most cases, he who throws the most money at promoting/advertising their product wins, which Cisco has done a great job at.
I can give you one product that I have not had much luck with...Linksys, which is put out by Cisco. For their high-end stuff to work pretty good most of the time, they sure as hell can't get the home market down, of course, that's my opinion and the experience I have had with several Linksys routers.
To the OP, remember, don't put so much faith in one product. One weak link can break the whole chain. As RoleReversal pointed out, Cisco consistently has its share of vulnerabilities, which does not necessarily make it a bad product. But, having other solutions in place is a wise choice.
Logged
MCP, CEH
dalepearson
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 357
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #4 on:
September 28, 2008, 09:20:02 AM »
Like I said, dont put all your eggs in one basket (all one vendor) unless there is a strategic reason.
Multiple layers is the key, and if this can incorporate various vendor offerings the better.
Logged
:: Subliminal Hacking ::
/
:: Security Active Blog ::
scucci
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 29
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #5 on:
October 06, 2008, 11:29:25 AM »
Thanks you everyone for your reviews.
Logged
charlottebandit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 49
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #6 on:
October 23, 2008, 10:43:15 PM »
I think it matters a lot (personal preference) because Cisco security products have steered away from mostly being point products several years ago. For the past couple of years, they've focused on collaborating each security controls together to integrate with another & even escalate the security of other Cisco security solutions.
Security no longer becomes an afterthought or a necessary evil, but a security architecture that's designed to scale to Government & Compliancy requirements (like PCI, HIPPA, SOX) which goes far beyond just a simple firewall.
Logged
MS, CCSP, CCNP, CCDP, CEH, CHFI, CPTS
Cr@sh
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 5
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #7 on:
December 04, 2008, 01:32:05 PM »
With there recent purchase of Ironport they have stepped up there arsonal of network security by ten fold. I recently was able to attend a demo on the Ironport and was very impressed with there product. My company is now using a largescale Ironport as a virusgateway and email scanner and it's working very well.
Logged
charlottebandit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 49
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #8 on:
December 30, 2008, 08:56:10 AM »
Yup. Ironport works as a wonderful email & web content filtering front end which also collaborates with Cisco's Security Agent (CSA) to reinforce Data Loss Prevention, or info leakage through email.
Their latest acquisition this past summer will really ramp up network security with role-based application enforcement/security. And like their other security offerings, it will probably work together which will take it to the top IMO.
«
Last Edit: December 30, 2008, 09:16:19 AM by charlottebandit
»
Logged
MS, CCSP, CCNP, CCDP, CEH, CHFI, CPTS
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1057
aka dynamik
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #9 on:
January 15, 2009, 10:26:59 AM »
Quote from: dalepearson on September 28, 2008, 09:20:02 AM
Like I said, dont put all your eggs in one basket (all one vendor) unless there is a strategic reason.
Multiple layers is the key, and if this can incorporate various vendor offerings the better.
The problem with this approach is that you must become equally proficient with multiple products. For example, using two different firewalls would prevent an exploit in one from working on the other, but at the same time, you may increase the likelihood of configuration errors. I'm not outright disagreeing with you, since that approach does have benefits as well. I'm just offering an alternate perspective because I think some people develop a false sense of security by taking the multi-vendor approach.
Logged
WIP: GCFA |
www.infosiege.net
| @infosiege
The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
shednik
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 75
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #10 on:
January 15, 2009, 12:38:05 PM »
Quote from: dynamik on January 15, 2009, 10:26:59 AM
The problem with this approach is that you must become equally proficient with multiple products. For example, using two different firewalls would prevent an exploit in one from working on the other, but at the same time, you may increase the likelihood of configuration errors. I'm not outright disagreeing with you, since that approach does have benefits as well. I'm just offering an alternate perspective because I think some people develop a false sense of security by taking the multi-vendor approach.
To get around that for example in my company's environment we have a team of individuals whom work on certain aspects of the infrastructure. Each one has their own specialty and have a working proficiency in the rest. So in all everyone can work with everything, but we have an expert for each technology. So for major changes the SME would either complete or review all configuration changes to ensure there are no issues. Nice to see you over here dynamik
Logged
CCNA, MCP, A+, N+
WIP: Masters of Infosec, CEH, & Mastering C
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1057
aka dynamik
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #11 on:
January 15, 2009, 12:57:44 PM »
Yep, if you have the resources to go about things that way, that's an excellent solution. That's why I wasn't saying one approach was right and the other was wrong; it's entirely circumstantial.
Nice to see you too! I'm a little intimidated by the level of technical proficiency here, so I'm probably just going to lurk for the most part
Logged
WIP: GCFA |
www.infosiege.net
| @infosiege
The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
charlottebandit
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 49
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #12 on:
January 21, 2009, 10:43:56 PM »
Quote from: dynamik on January 15, 2009, 12:57:44 PM
Nice to see you too! I'm a little intimidated by the level of technical proficiency here, so I'm probably just going to lurk for the most part
Don't be intimidated dynamik. Nobody knows everything and all of us had to start somewhere too. Not only that but we're able to share ideas and techniques here.
Logged
MS, CCSP, CCNP, CCDP, CEH, CHFI, CPTS
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4167
Editor-In-Chief
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #13 on:
January 22, 2009, 01:46:55 AM »
Hey dynamik,
I'll second that. If this place was only full of experts, it would be a very lonely place. None of us are perfect, and I can guarantee that none of us know everything about this field. There is simply too much. And what has been picked up along the way, we all want to share it with those behind us as those in front of us did for us.
Keep it up and spread the word to other lurkers who may feel the same.
A BIG welcome to EH-Net,
Don
Logged
CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
ajohnson
Recruiters
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1057
aka dynamik
Re: Cisco Security
«
Reply #14 on:
January 22, 2009, 11:40:04 AM »
Thanks for the welcome guys
I'm actually not too nervous; that was more of a compliment to you guys. This seems like a great forum with respectful, knowledgeable members, so I don't think there's any reason to experience
n00b anxiety
when posting
I'm fairly tech-savvy, but I'm still quite new to the ethical hacking scene. I was introduced to this site by a few people I know from techexams.net (where I'm
slightly more active
). I'll definitely be recommending this site to other EH enthusiasts.
TE is king when it comes to IT certifications (though very specialized ones such as the GPEN don't get much mention), but the level of depth you guys get into is astounding. This appears to be a phenomenal resource, and I'm very much looking forward to going through the forums, blog entries, columns, etc.
Well, I think that's enough chatter; I have a great deal of catching up to do
Thanks again to everyone who makes this possible
Logged
WIP: GCFA |
www.infosiege.net
| @infosiege
The day you stop learning is the day you start becoming obsolete.
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
EH-Net
-----------------------------
=> Calendar Of Events
===> ChicagoCon 2007
===> ChicagoCon 2008s
===> ChicagoCon 2008f
===> ChicagoCon 2009s
=> Ethical Hacktivism
=> News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
===> Greetings
=> Special Events
-----------------------------
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications
-----------------------------
=> General Certification
===> Networking
===> OS
===> Security
=> Compliance, Regulations & Standards
=> Control Systems
=> Cyber Warfare
=> Forensics
===> CCE / MCCE - (Master) Certified Computer Examiner
===> CHFI - Computer Hacking Forensic Investigator
===> EnCE - EnCase® Certified Examiner
===> GCFA - GIAC Certified Forensics Analyst
=> Hardware
=> Incident Response
===> CSIH - Computer Security Incident Handler
===> GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
=> Malware
===> Advisories
=> Mobile
=> Network Pen Testing
===> CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker
===> CPTC - Certified Penetration Testing Consultant
===> CPTE - Certified Penetration Testing Engineer
===> CSTA - Certified Security Testing Associate
===> eCPPT - eLearnSecurity Certified Professional Penetration Tester
===> ECSA - EC-Council Certified Security Analyst
===> GPEN - GIAC Certified Penetration Tester
===> OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
=> Physical Security
=> Programming
=> Social Engineering
=> Web Applications
=> Wireless
===> CWNP Certs
===> GAWN - GIAC Assessing Wireless Networks
===> OSWP - Offensive Security Wireless Professional
=> Other
-----------------------------
Columns
-----------------------------
=> Editor-In-Chief
=> Andress
=> Gates
=> Haddix
=> Hadnagy
=> Heffner
=> Hoffman
=> Linn
=> RichM
=> Murray
=> J. Peltier
=> Weidman
=> Wilson
-----------------------------
Features
-----------------------------
=> /root
=> Book Reviews
=> Opinions
=> Skillz
===> Examples
===> May 06 - Star Hacks, Episode V: The Empire Hacks Back
===> July 06 - Hack Bill!
===> Sept 06 - Netcat in the Hat
===> Nov 06 - Hitch-Hackers Guide to the Galaxy
===> Dec 06 - A Christmas (Hacking) Story
===> Feb 07 - Charlottes Web Site
===> April 07 - Microsoft Office Space
===> June 07 - Serenity Hack
===> Oct 07 - Worst. Ethical. Hacker. Challenge. Ever.
===> Dec 07 - Frosty the Snow Crash
===> March 2008 - It Happened One Friday
===> Oct 2008 - Scooby Doo and the Crypto Caper
===> Dec 08 - Santa Claus Is Hacking to Town
===> Feb 2009 - Brady Bunch Boondoggle
===> July 2009 - Prison Break
===> October 2009 - SSHliders
===> December 2009 - Miracle on Thirty-Hack Street
===> December 2010 - The Nightmare Before Charlie Browns Christmas
-----------------------------
Resources
-----------------------------
=> Career Central
===> Looking For Work
===> Looking To Hire
=> Links to cool sites.
=> Mass Media
=> News from the Outside World
=> Tools
=> Tutorials
===> Tutorial Requests
Loading...
Exclusive Deal
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22
5% Off
w/ Code
:
EHN_5
SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF
Any
SANS Course
in Any Format!
Coupon Code:
EHN_5
Including
SANS Rocky Mountain 2013
&
SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
Great!
Better.
About the same.
Little worse.
FUBAR!
Recent Forum Topics
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: Passed my GCIH
(3) by
H1t M0nk3y
Greetings
: Hi from the UK
(3) by
UKSecurityGuy
GCIH - GIAC Certified Incident Handler
: GCIH Free Practice test attempt
(0) by
prats84
News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net
: Change is Coming to EH-Net!!
(27) by
don
Network Pen Testing
: AIX Vulnerability Assessments
(2) by
ras76
Tutorials
: Need guidance
(9) by
hanyhasan
Programming
: Finished Python Course in Codecademy now what?
(15) by
hanyhasan
Network Pen Testing
: Ruby on Rails Vulnerabilities / Attacks in BackTrack 5 r3
(0) by
SUdoctstudent
Network Pen Testing
: De-ICE 1.140 released!
(2) by
superkojiman
General Certification
: CPT Practical Submission
(1) by
UNIX
OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
: Failed my first attempt at the OSCP exam
(94) by
azmatt
Tools
: Social-Engineer Toolkit (SET) Version 5.0 “The Wild West” Released
(2) by
m0wgli
Malware
: EICAR?
(3) by
UKSecurityGuy
Advisories
: HTB23154: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Exponent CMS
(0) by
AndyP
Advisories
: HTB23153: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Jojo CMS
(0) by
AndyP
Advisories
: HTB23151: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in UMI.CMS
(0) by
AndyP
OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
: Class Scheduled 6/8 - Linux n00b
(7) by
Taemyks
OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional
: OSCP exam scheduled
(6) by
gbhat
Incident Response
: LinkedIn Forensics
(0) by
AFENTIS_Forensics
General Certification
: Red Team/Blue Team
(1) by
ajohnson
Career Central
: Starter cert?
(3) by
Grendel
Network Pen Testing
: Beginner Ethical Hacker
(1) by
m0wgli
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
Privacy Notice
for TDCC & All Properties
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks
© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla!
is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.