One thing that is bugging me with his defence is that I have been following the case for a few years and have only just heard mentioned that he may have a mild form of aspergers. If he was competent enough to slide through government security (despite it supposedly being wide open) he should be competent enough to know he shouldn't be doing it, to bring this up at the 11th hour smells like gamesmanship from his lawyers to me...
Should he be sat in a jail cell for the next few years? Yes. Most certainly
Should he be extradited? No. According to UK law he committed the offence in the UK and should therefore be charged and tried in the UK courts. There have been many similar cases where extradition was refused. The only reason I can see that this is different is that he's been labeled a terrorist (which IMHO is BS).
Regarding the aspergers I agree, I think they are just doing all they can to try and keep him in this country. From the Video footage I have seen of him, he comes across as a knowledgable and intelligent person.
Regarding the UK law thing, I am no expert, but I believe its the issue with UK law that is allowing for the extradition without evidence in the first place.
He shouldnt of done what he did, everyone knows it and so does he.
He needs a good telling off, some time away for some more thinking (sure he has done alot of that over the last 6 years), and he should be tried fairly inkeeping with what he has done, with the real evidence.
He may be a criminal, but I dont think its fair to leave it all hanging for so long.