Image
 
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 19 guests and 1 member online
EH-Net Donations

Enter Amount:
$

Google Ads
ChicagoCon 2008f
chicagocon2008f_125x200banner.jpg
ChicagoCon 2008f
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
Book Recommendations





 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Forum arrow Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certificationsarrow Certificationarrow The Charter Study Group - Pen Testarrow Charter Study Group Focus Poll
Ethical Hacker Community Forums
October 06, 2008, 05:36:16 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Registration Now Open for ChicagoCon 2008f Oct 27 - Nov 2! Visit www.chicagocon.com.
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: In our studies of pen testing, should we focus on:
CEH Only - 0 (0%)
CPTS Only - 0 (0%)
Both Simultaneously - 1 (16.7%)
Both with CEH First - 4 (66.7%)
Both with CPTS First - 1 (16.7%)
Total Voters: 6

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Charter Study Group Focus Poll  (Read 3422 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2300


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: April 05, 2006, 03:37:28 PM »

Vote first and then state your reasons why.

Don

I voted for both with CEH first, because I feel that CEH is more widely known and a good place to start. I also feel that CPTS has more updated material and may eventually become a higher level cert in this field. Studying for CEH first will help us pass the possibly more difficult CPTS and eventually CPTE exams.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2006, 03:48:32 PM by don » Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CEH, Security+ SME
Oyle
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 264


"Man. Nature. Technology".


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2006, 12:00:48 PM »

I voted for the same choice, for almost the exact same reasons, except that the CEH just gives you a foundation into the technology, which then leads into the harder (if that's possible) certifications; CPTE, CPTS, CIPP, GIAC, CWNA, etc.....

 
Logged

MCP, MCP+I, MCSA, MCSE(NT4/W2K), CCNA, CCA, NWCCC, VH-PIRTS, CEH
--------------------
"hackers are like jedi, crackers are like the sith: do not fall prey to the dark side".

From 1337 h4x0r h4ndb00k: "the ten laws of geek", law x
                  -Tapeworm
tmartin
Recruiters
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2006, 12:40:33 PM »

I'd go with both because they overlap a lot.
Logged
Dengar13
Moderator
Full Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 224



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 07, 2006, 10:14:53 AM »

I voted for the same choice, for almost the exact same reasons, except that the CEH just gives you a foundation into the technology, which then leads into the harder (if that's possible) certifications; CPTE, CPTS, CIPP, GIAC, CWNA, etc.....

 

I second that opinion!
Logged

A+, Net+, MCP, CEH
MCSE: Security/Messaging
MCSA: Security/Messaging
Former U.S. Marine and damn proud of it!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 26 queries.
 

Microsoft Blue Hat Hackers Headline ChicagoCon
Ethical Hacking Conference Oct 31 - Nov 2

Help spread the word!

Polls
Why a Career in Ethical Hacking:
 
Support EH-Net
chicagocon2008f_125x200banner.jpg
ChicagoCon 2008f


Support EH-Net by
Buying all of your
Amazon items using
the search bar above.

cbtnuggets_logo_125.jpg
Try CBT Nuggets Free!
Recent Forum Topics
Vote For EH-Net

progenic.com
Click here to Vote!

Sadikhov.com
Top IT Cert Sites

binarica.com
Binarica Logo

Add to Technorati Favorites
technorati fave

chicagocon2008f_125x200banner.jpg
ChicagoCon 2008f
 
         
Advertisement

© 2008 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.