Image
 
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 21 guests and 5 members online
EH-Net Donations

Enter Amount:
$

Google Ads
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
Book Recommendations





 
Advertisement

You are here: Home arrow Forum arrow Resourcesarrow Toolsarrow Opinions on best Network Vulnerability Scanners
Ethical Hacker Community Forums
January 07, 2009, 09:58:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: ChicagoCon 2-Day Ethical Hacking Conference with MS Blue Hats Oct 31 - Nov 1. Tickets Only $100! www.chicagocon.com/content/view/103/51/
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Opinions on best Network Vulnerability Scanners  (Read 2895 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
geekyone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 132



View Profile
« on: November 28, 2007, 05:56:31 PM »

I was wondering what everyone thinks is the best available network vulnerability scanner?  My company is currently running ISS but we are looking to move to something else possibly more cost efficient.  We do support a fairly large network so the tool has to be able to handle large scale scanning.  Any ideas are welcome!

Thanks in advance for the advice!
Logged

CISSP, CEH, GPEN, GCIH
g00d_4sh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 296



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2007, 07:23:10 PM »

Well I'm not nearly as experienced as a number of others here, but from what I have used.... Nessus works very well. It's... free, unless you want newer than 7 day old vulnerabilities to scan for, it's pretty easy to use, and it's a classic.  I've never used Qualys or Core Impact, but I've heard good things about the Q and great things about Core.  Core isn't cheap though... 27k/year, but they give out deals to government agencies (10% off) and discounts if you sign up for CyberSecurity with Chubb.  Honestly though, at 27k a year I'd just use Nessus unless you are professional.  The Q has appliances you can set up I believe, and they have a decent interface.  I don't remember their pricing off hand, but they're not as high as Core Impact.
Logged

"Bad.. Good?  I'm the guy with the gun"
g00d_4sh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 296



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2007, 07:37:47 PM »

On a side note, I just noticed an article on Dark Reading about Qualys providing a free scan to anyone. It scans for the top 20 SANs vulnerabilities. 
http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=140088&WT.svl=wire_2
Logged

"Bad.. Good?  I'm the guy with the gun"
Kev
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 359


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2007, 07:42:37 PM »

The best free scanner is Nessus. I run it form Linux because the last time I checked there where a few more options available on the Linux version than the program that was written for windows. For a paid version, GFILanguard has the best bang for the buck.
Logged
dean
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2007, 08:12:14 PM »

geekyone, are you looking to run automated scans of multiple subnets or just scan each new host before allowing it onto the production network.

I regularly use Nessus and ISS for both automated scans and on demand scanning. I've only used Qualys on pentests and I like it a lot. I has a very, very big db of scans and they are very effective at scanning large subnets quickly. The scan data is stored on Qualys servers though. If you talk with them you will find that this is not as much of an issue as it sounds. The data is encrypted and you're really the only one with access to it. It is also very cost effective as you only pay for each engagement based on number of IPs.

I would not really class a tool like Core Impact in with traditional vulnerability scanners though. It is more in the realm of an automated exploitation tool that actively compromises the host. It would fit in the same category as  Immunity's Canvas and Metasploit. Core does have a consultant license too.

It all depends on budget too. Seeing as you are already paying for ISS you might want to have the various vendors pilot/demo their tool on specific hosts/subnets in your environment. Pick the best one based on results.

dean
Logged

<script>alert('%52%54%46%4D')</script>
geekyone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 132



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2007, 09:21:25 PM »

I am looking to run automated scans on multiple subnets.  Nessus is definitely being considered it's hard to argue with "Free".  Even though we are already paying for ISS I am getting the feeling from the people with the purse strings that they would like a solution that doesn't come with an annual fee or at least something cheap.  I personally don't have a problem with ISS and the cost (from a corporate budget perspective) is reasonable but I don't make the budget decisions.

I like the sound of Qualys but it doesn't sound any cheaper then what we have now.  I really don't know if I could sell the boss on having our vulnerability information stored on an outside company’s server.

We do use GFILanguard but not really for vulnerability discovery.  Does anyone know if you can configure Languard scan similar to ISS or Nessus?

Thanks again!  Cheesy
Logged

CISSP, CEH, GPEN, GCIH
Kev
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 359


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2007, 09:29:06 PM »

If you don't use GFIlangaurd for a vulnerability scanning, which is its purpose, what do you use it for?
Logged
geekyone
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 132



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2007, 10:30:11 PM »

LOL, Well we use it for scanning but usually for only scanning a single PC.  Normally because we have reason to suspect malicous activity from that PC.  We scan the PC to get O/S, patches installed, open ports, local account password settings, and registry anomolies.  Why they only use it this way I don't know.  I am newer to the company maybe it is a licensing issue?  Or it is possible no one has bothered to work in depth enough with it to set it up correctly.

So do you think I am completely crazy and should recommend getting GFILandguard configured correctly thus solving all my problems?

Cause it thats the case my boss is going to love me.  Cool
Logged

CISSP, CEH, GPEN, GCIH
dean
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2007, 11:52:08 PM »

Quote
If you don't use GFIlangaurd for a vulnerability scanning, which is its purpose, what do you use it for?

GFI's Languard  can be used for patch deployment and not vulnerability scanning alone. you can check for patches, download and push them to the hosts via the interface.
Logged

<script>alert('%52%54%46%4D')</script>
Kev
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 359


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 28, 2007, 11:58:48 PM »

Yes of course and very true, buts its raison d’ętre is to be a security scanner.
Logged
pseud0
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 154



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2007, 08:33:25 AM »

To throw in my two cents:
I just finished rolling out Qualys for one of the big 3 auto manufacturers, and I have been fairly impressed so far.  The major advantage for a lot of people is the control interface.  It is all web based, you can slice and dice the results as needed, setup a wide variety of scans that are as passive or invasive as you think you'd need, all of the updateing and maintenance is handled by Qualys, and is has a very nifty built in reporting module that can kick off surprisingly polished executive reports.  It brings a lot of value to global operations, but I'm not sure you're going to get the same bang for your buck for smaller networks.  The major bonus of consolidated control and reporting is not going to be as much of a factor if you have dozens of security folks rather than thousands. Depending on your agreement with IBM, I just don't know if you are going to get much in the way of dollar savings by switching to the Q.  Nessus is obviously the best dollar value choice if you go with the free version, but that is only the case if you can handle not having updated signatures.  Even then, if you have a small enough shop you can get the paid version for about $1200.  That is only for a single user, though, and you still don't have the full enterprise command and control interface. 

There are not a lot of specific recommendations people are going to be able to give you without having more info on your environment, but I'd recommend not posting much more info than you already have.  I'm probably preaching to the choir, but I'd avoid posting too much data into an open forum.  PM some of the more senior members of the group if you want more detailed advice.
« Last Edit: November 29, 2007, 08:39:48 AM by pseud0 » Logged

CISSP, CISM
nicky.coder
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2007, 10:30:23 PM »

Hi,

I would like you to introduce to a new startup company in India who does On Demand penetration testing.

Have a look at http://www.ivizindia.com/iviz/

Logged

Sec+, OSCP
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.05 seconds with 23 queries.
 
Sponsors

cwnp_moto__120x90.gif

Polls
How many security events including conferences and training do you attend a year:
 
Support EH-Net


Support EH-Net by
Buying all of your
Amazon items using
the search bar above.

cbtnuggets_logo_125.jpg
Try CBT Nuggets Free!
Recent Forum Topics
Vote For EH-Net

progenic.com
Click here to Vote!

binarica.com
Binarica Logo

Add to Technorati Favorites
technorati fave

 
         
Advertisement

© 2009 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.