Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 22 guests and 1 member online
 
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

You are here: Home arrow Columnsarrow Heffnerarrow [Article]-Intro to Reverse Engineering - No Assembly Required
EH-Net
May 21, 2013, 01:26:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [Article]-Intro to Reverse Engineering - No Assembly Required  (Read 65423 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4165


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« on: August 07, 2007, 03:16:24 AM »

My apologies to Craig for the delay in publishing this paper as I was a little busy attending BH/DefCon and the neverending work on ChicagoCon. But this one is definitely worth the wait as many of you expressed interest in the topic of this article.  Well done, Mr. Heffner.

Permanent Link: [Article]-Intro to Assembly and Reverse Engineering

Quote
Last time we went over the C programming language in an introductory article specifically focusing on getting the security professional on the road to coding (or at least the road to understanding). This time around we extend the series of coding articles for non-programmers with an area of high interest in the infosec community, reverse engineering.

This paper is intended as an introduction to reverse engineering for someone who has no experience whatsoever on the subject. You should have some basic knowledge of C programming, and access to a Windows or Linux box (preferably both) using the x86 architecture (i.e., your average computer). No knowledge of assembly code, registers, or the like is assumed, although it helps. This introduction section of the paper is intended for the newcomer who has little or no understanding of what reverse engineering is, and may be skipped by those looking for more technical details.

As always, feedback is encouraged as well as future topic ideas for Craig.

Don
« Last Edit: August 09, 2007, 11:58:22 AM by don » Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
crapbot
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2007, 07:52:31 AM »

Great article. Are there any books that you would recommend ? Books targeted at people that know C/ASM and are looking to learn about reverse engineering, specifically, malware reverse engineering.

Cheers
« Last Edit: August 09, 2007, 11:58:44 AM by don » Logged
nebu10uz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2007, 05:01:06 AM »

Excellent! I really enjoyed this paper.

Thanks Craig for explaining this topic in a simple and clear visual manner. I think this is the first time I really understood the basic of Assembly and RCE. I know that this is just an introduction but it really helps to grasp the fundamentals for other advance related topics. Looking forward the second part of this article.

Keep up the good work!!
« Last Edit: August 09, 2007, 11:58:58 AM by don » Logged

Security+, OSCP, CEH
don
Editor-In-Chief
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4165


Editor-In-Chief


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 09, 2007, 12:20:13 PM »

Help get Craig the deserved attention on this awesome paper:

Digg It!!

http://digg.com/programming/Intro_to_Reverse_Engineering_No_Assembly_Required

Don
Logged

CISSP, MCSE, CSTA, Security+ SME
Paul
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2007, 05:15:54 PM »

Thanks for your awesome paper. I have been interested in learning more on RCE and have been held up by the fact that no one writes to the true entry level person. Your overview of registers was very well wrote.

I ran through the Hello World examples and had slight differences. I understand each disassembler will spit something different, I am wondering if you can tell me what is going on though. I m using gdb 6.6-debian.

Dump of assembler code for function main:
0x080483a0 <main+0>:    lea    0x4(%esp),%ecx
0x080483a4 <main+4>:    and    $0xfffffff0,%esp
0x080483a7 <main+7>:    pushl  0xfffffffc(%ecx)

0x080483aa <main+10>:   push   %ebp
0x080483ab <main+11>:   mov    %esp,%ebp
0x080483ad <main+13>:   push   %ecx
0x080483ae <main+14>:   sub    $0x4,%esp
0x080483b1 <main+17>:   movl   $0x1,0x80495cc
0x080483bb <main+27>:   call   0x8048374 <myprint>
0x080483c0 <main+32>:   mov    $0x0,%eax
0x080483c5 <main+37>:   add    $0x4,%esp
0x080483c8 <main+40>:   pop    %ecx
0x080483c9 <main+41>:   pop    %ebp
0x080483ca <main+42>:   lea    0xfffffffc(%ecx),%esp
0x080483cd <main+45>:   ret   
End of assembler dump.

The first three lines are where I am confused. I read about load effective address, but I don't know what it is loading.

Also in myprint(), I am using:

0x0804838b <myprint+23>:        call   0x80482bc <puts@plt>

I understand this is the print statement although do you have any input on puts vs print?

Thanks for the awesome paper, when is part two coming out?

Logged
ddnc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2007, 08:12:47 AM »

Hey Paul,

Code:
lea 0x4(%esp),%ecx
pushl 0xfffffffc(%ecx)

These instructions serve to save the stack pointer on the stack. Notice that at main+42, this value is loaded back into ESP in order to restore the stack pointer before returning.

Code:
and $0xfffffff0,%esp

This instruction zeros out the last byte in the ESP register. This is done to ensure that the stack pointer is aligned on a 16-byte boundary (the default stack boundary is 16) in order to increase CPU execution time. There's a short semi-discussion on it at the Kernel Trap forums: http://kerneltrap.org/node/8236 .

As far as puts() goes, it's not much different from printf() when just printing out a string. You should see the memory address where the string is located pushed onto the stack just before the call to puts(). It will place a positive number in the EAX register if successful (probably 1), and a -1 in EAX if it fails.
Logged
nebu10uz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2008, 06:30:10 PM »

I found a mistake in this article:

Quote
jnz     jnz 0x08ffff01     Jump if the zero flag is set to 1

The jnz (jump if not zero) instruction jumps if the zero flag is clear.

Code:
jnz   Jump if the zero flag is set to 0

For example, if an operation such as CMP turns out to be true, the result will be zero which means that the zero flag will be set to 1. If the next instruction is a jnz, the jump will not be taken. However, if the CMP operation is not true, the result will be a non-zero value meaning that the zero flag is clear or 0. Since the zero flag is clear the next jump (jnz) will be taken.

I've been doing some research on reversing and assembly lately for a crack me challenge and spotted this error when I went back on reading this article.
Logged

Security+, OSCP, CEH
shawal
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2008, 10:46:50 PM »

crapbot ,

try "The Art of Assembly Programming" by Randall Hyde

blackazarro,

could you please post the URL for the challange you are trying to crack?
Logged

RHCE, GIAC GCIH.
nebu10uz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2008, 11:33:35 PM »


Quote
try "The Art of Assembly Programming" by Randall Hyde

Thanks for the reference, I'll check it out.

Quote
could you please post the URL for the challange you are trying to crack?

I was talking about the crackme02 posted by Don last week:

http://www.ethicalhacker.net/component/option,com_smf/Itemid,54/topic,2277.0/

I already solved it. I guess you just of to find the password in the right place.
Logged

Security+, OSCP, CEH
shawal
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 31, 2008, 12:36:05 AM »

blackazarro,

oh! that i did solve it too, however i did not require the assembly skills for that  Cheesy
Logged

RHCE, GIAC GCIH.
nebu10uz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2008, 12:46:53 AM »


Me either. I went on studying assembly before I attempted the challenge.
Logged

Security+, OSCP, CEH
_Marshel_
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61

Life Is too short to be someone else.


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2008, 04:16:21 AM »

speaking of reverse engineering, what is the best book/tutorial/way to learn assembly ?
Logged
shawal
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 88


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2008, 08:33:03 AM »

_Marshel_
check the following URL:
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AoA
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AoA/Linux/HTML/AoATOC.html
the site is not very user friendly, however if you manage to navigate you will be able to collect the rewards

You seem to be hunting for books these days, good luck Grin
Logged

RHCE, GIAC GCIH.
_Marshel_
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61

Life Is too short to be someone else.


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 31, 2008, 08:58:58 AM »

I'm a worm that feeds on reading Smiley

I'm always hunting for books. Wink
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 24 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Advertisement

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.