I came across an article recently not about the value of an ethical hacking certification, but rather the connotations that the word "ethical hacker" may hold. In other words, does "hacker" worry misinformed, potential employers? Has anyone ever come across a situation where they had to justify or defend their certification or the fact that they were training in hacking?  I've often wondered how an outsider may view the certification or practice, whether it be positive or negative.

Any thoughts or opinions?

Thanks for the input!  I picked up a copy of Gray Hat Hacking as well, and finding it a good read. I think I'll probably pick apart the objectives and simply study for the CPTS piece by piece. I've done weeklong Microsoft classes for the MCSE exams, but I really didn't find that the course prepared for the exams. I thought I fared better reading the books at my own pace and letting it sink in. I'll take the same approach here .

Hi everyone,

I'm new to the forums, but wanted to say how insightful and helpful these boards are. I do have a question that I haven't been able to determine an answer to. Does Mile2 offer a self-study program leading to the CPTS certification? Or are you required to attend the week long bootcamp that they offer?

Has anyone pursued this track?

Thanks for any help you can provide!