Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 38 guests online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home
EH-Net
May 25, 2013, 06:30:00 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
  Home Help Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
1  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / General Certification / Re: CEH exam simulation on: April 25, 2013, 06:38:16 AM
I bought the CEH ExSim from Boson in 2007 (paid $49.95, I see that it's now $99) and I found it to be OK, never tried Ucertify though. But that was many years ago and I don't know how good the exam simulator is now . I did the CEH via self study and the exam simulator was just a tool to reinforce what I had learnt and I never used it that much, I think I only tried the exam simulation twice. I agree with Hayabusa, if you have studied for the OSCP and have CEH material and know the CEH material you shouldn't have a problem with the exam.

Afterall, you have a 25% chance of passing the multiple guess exam  Wink
2  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker / Re: CEH application fee? on: February 23, 2013, 05:47:40 PM
Hmm a new requirement $100  Huh. I never had to pay anything years ago, just fill out the form and email it to ECC, I guess it might be a way for ECC to generate  some money if you take the self study route.
The following page has information and a contact, might be worth getting in touch and asking for more info: https://cert.eccouncil.org/certified-member/faq/examination
3  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker / Re: AIO master Master Exam (Learnkey) test questions help. on: February 23, 2013, 05:26:55 PM
I don't agree with some of the answers, I'm also guessing that the test is somewhat outdated. I also think that an additional study resource would also benefit you. I've answered most of the questions below as best as I can.

This did not seem to post, so if it shows up more then once, I apologize.


I have been going through and vetting all the test questions and have come across several that are either wrong, or I do not understand.  Can anyone please help me with the ones I do not understand?

Q1. You are reviewing log files and results form a day of pen testing. The following command appears in one of the logs:
    nc -l -u -p 55555 < /etc/passwd
What was the ethical hacker attempting to do?

They say the answer is Take a copy of the /etc/passwd file when connected to 55555. - I guess I am not understanding the work flow here. Can someone explain this to me? It is missing an IP and I guess that is what is throwing me off.

You're thinking in terms of using netcat to connect to a system, the example above shows that netcat is running on the local machine (listen mode) with the following options:

-l Listen
-u UDP protocol
-p port (55555)
< defines what should happen when a connection is made, in this case the /etc/passwd file should be sent to the connecting machine.

To grab the /etc/passwd file from an attacking machine, you would type:
nc -u <ip address> 55555
for example: nc -u 192.168.1.34 55555
Since the connection is over UDP, you'll just see an option connection but if you press enter twice you'll see the passwd file contents displayed on the screen.  


Q2. You are running a FIN scan. What response would you expect from a closed port?

They say nothing, but in my tests I always get a RST packet, regardless of OS. (Windows 2003, Linux Metasploitable)

Q3. You are running a FIN scan. What would you expect from an open port?

They say RST, I say you cant tell without knowing the OS. Windows gives a RST, but Metasplotable returned nothing.

You're right in that different Operating Systems will reply differently to a FIN. Linux returns a FIN ACK if the port is open. I've seen Windows send a RST in reply to a FIN (does not shut the connection down gracefully). Linux replies with a RST ACK to a FIN scan if the port is closed.

Q4. What port does Tini use?

They say 777, but Symantec and other sites say 7777. I am guessing it is a type O on their part?

Port 7777 is the correct port for Tini, reference here: http://www.ntsecurity.nu/toolbox/tini/


Q5. How is a session key created in SSL?

They say The client creates it after verifying the server's identity.

Several sites say they both do. It is based on the random string of the server and the premaster secret from the client. Who is right?

http://www.tech-faq.com/ssl-secure-sockets-layer.html

"The client next generates a premaster secret. This is a different random string which will in turn be utilized to generate the session key for the SSL session."


Q6. Your network administrator wants to prevent NetBIOS traffic into a segment. Which ports should be clocked on the firewall. (Choose all that apply)

They say 135, 139 and 445.

445? I thought that used to be NetBIOS over TCP, but that is no longer true. What is the best answer for the CEH exam?

Port 445 is SMB over TCP. It seems that they are confusing NetBIOS with SMB when they mention port 445. They're asking you about NetBIOS to see if you know which ports NetBIOS uses. Take a look at the following links:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc940063.aspx
 http://www.petri.co.il/what_is_port_445_in_w2kxp.htm
and http://quizlet.com/18203329/ceh-ports-flash-cards/


Q7. You are asked to compile a program in Linux. Which commands will you need? (Choose all that apply)

They say ./configure, make, make install

I say ./configure and make.
My understanding is that make install installs the compiled code. Who is correct?

Make install will install the complied code on the system. If the question was worded differently and mentioned what commands would you need to compile AND install the program then I would agree with all three.


Q8. How does traceroute work?

They say It manipulates the TTl (hop count) within packets TO ELICIT AN ERROR MESSAGE AT EACH HOP.

I say take out the error part and you are good to go. Right?

Traceroute works by sending ICMP packets (echo requests), I guess the error message they are referring to is the ICMP Time Exceeded.

Q9. An attacker hopes to capture data from a target Bluetooth device. Which Bluetooth attack will be performed.

They say BlueSniffing
I say Bluescarfing.

My understanding is Bluescarfing is the actual theft of data, where Bluesniffing is like using wireshark. While you could steal data that way, it would seem that Bluescarfing is a better answer. What do you all say?

Q10. At what layer does SSL operate?

They say Layer 4 (Transport)

I find answers that say layer 7 and layer 5 and have been told that encryption happens at layer 6 (What I was taught in Net+)

What is the correct answer for the CEH test?

Q11. You run a null scan against a target, which returns all ports open. Which of the following statements is true?
* all ports are open
* system is most likely a web server
* The system is a Windows machine <-- their answer
* The system is behind a firewall.

I have done this many times, and always Windows shows all ports are closed. I do not have access to Windows 2000 or NT.

I ran an NMAP Null scan against a Windows XP SP3 system and no replies were sent by the Windows machine no ACK, no RST ... nothing)

From the NMAP guide: not all systems follow RFC 793 to the letter. A number of systems send RST responses to the probes regardless of whether the port is open or not. This causes all of the ports to be labeled closed. Major operating systems that do this are Microsoft Windows, many Cisco devices, BSDI, and IBM OS/400. This scan does work against most Unix-based systems though. Another downside of these scans is that they can't distinguish open ports from certain filtered ones, leaving you with the response open|filtered.

Windows hosts do not comply with RFC 793. Subsequently, you cannot use a NULL scan against a Windows machine to determine which ports are active. When a Microsoft operating system receives a packet that has no flags set, it sends an RST packet in response, regardless of whether the port is open. With all NULL packets receiving an RST packet in response, you cannot differentiate open and closed ports.

UNIX-based systems do comply with RFC 793; therefore, they send RST packets back when the port is closed and no packet when the port is open.


Can someone please give me the correct answer and also explain this to me?

Q12. Your team has a pretty good idea of likely usernames and passwords (based on policy and previous testing). WHich of the following tests would be the best choice for the quickest results.
* brute force
* Dictionary
* Encryption
* Hybrid <-- their answer

I say Dictionary. No mention of complex passwords... just the fastest attack. Am I not right?

I agree with Hybrid.
Dictionary attacks are technically the fastest BUT the word list must contain the exact password. With a hybrid attack, dictionary words are used with combinations of numbers, special characters etc.. giving you more options for any variations of the possible password used.


Out of 300 questions, to only not understand these... I do not feel I am doing to bad. But I would like to understand them all! Smiley So any help would be most appreciated!

Thank you,

Dalobo

4  EH-Net / News Items and General Discussion About EH-Net / Re: [Article]-May 2012 Free Giveaway Winner of iSWAT Training by FishNet Security on: October 17, 2012, 06:23:51 AM
Congrats on passing the exam. Did you enjoy the pain? Did you use the full 6 hours?  Smiley

I attended the iSWAT training a few weeks ago and took the CISSP course.  This morning, I took the exam and passed. 

I don't have an endorser so it may be a couple of months before I'm an actual CISSP, but I'm very happy to have the exam behind me.

Don: Thanks again.


5  Resources / Links to cool sites. / Re: Cybergeddon on: October 01, 2012, 08:26:00 AM
I watched this series last week and I was going to post about it here on EHN but you beat me to it  Wink

I watched them all and it isn't too bad. I almost stopped watching it after the 1st episode when I saw this  Grin:

 

They could at least have used a real IP Address that is fully routable like 127.0.0.1 .... right?  Tongue






[I know the reason why they used the address above, similar to the 555 phone numbers, just found it amusing]
6  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker / Re: Is ENSA mandatory to take CEH? on: September 27, 2012, 05:05:23 AM
I would recommend to contact EC Council directly and ask them about exam eligibility: http://www.eccouncil.org/contact_us.aspx

When I did the CEH exam I went the self-study route and had to submit a request for an eligibility code to book the exam. If you have attended some other security training, EC-Council might take this into account and waiver the work experience.

11. Can I purse self-study and attempt the exam instead of attending formal training?

The answer is yes. You must show 2 years of work experience in security related field. You must also submit CEH exam eligibility application and obtain authorization from EC-Council before you can attempt the exam. Please visit http://www.eccouncil.org/certification/exam_information/take_exam.aspx for more details.
7  Columns / Andress / Re: [Article]-Spooky Warfare Hacking Contest on: September 21, 2012, 01:51:28 PM
Jason, here's something for you  Wink : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1XZGHOxnCto

8  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional / Re: OSCP exam question on: July 09, 2012, 10:14:17 AM
Thanks for answer!

If i run remote exploit on server and by mistake that service got crash then? for example i can see there is a exploit on port 80 but if i run come script which crash service, now how i get in to port 80? in exam can i revert back machine to original state?

You can revert the machines during the exam (just like the lab) and if you have any problems with any of the machines you can also get hold of one of the admins via chat and they can reset the machine if required.
9  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Social Engineering / Re: SET Error on port 80 on: June 25, 2012, 04:42:34 AM
If you're using Backtrack, you probably have apache set to start automatically, which is probably where the conflict is.

netstat -antp will tell you what the problem is.


I'm using backtrack 5r2, a netstat -antp reveals me this,

root@bt:~# netstat -antp

Active Internet connections (servers and established)

Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address           Foreign Address         State       PID/Program name

tcp        0      0 0.0.0.0:80              0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN      1127/apache2    

tcp        0      0 127.0.0.1:5432          0.0.0.0:*               LISTEN      786/postgres    

tcp6       0      0 ::1:5432                :::*                    LISTEN      786/postgres    



Apache is running, I highlighted in bold, that's why SET doesn't load.
Try stopping Apache and see if that helps: "apache2 stop"  or "/etc/init.d/apache2 stop"
10  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Forensics / Re: Burn Note on: June 23, 2012, 09:35:02 AM
If you had a packet capture running when you got the thing, you might be able to carve out the data.

The site uses SSL/HTTPS  Wink
11  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Forensics / Re: Burn Note on: June 23, 2012, 09:32:30 AM
I don't think you can retrieve the burned note once the timer expires since it's done on the back end. Not sure if the note is actually deleted/purged from the system or just the link to the note is removed/expired
12  EH-Net / Greetings / Re: Hey guys (again) on: June 11, 2012, 07:37:34 AM
Goed zo!  Wink
13  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: So you scanned a host, and found open ports!! on: May 30, 2012, 10:30:35 AM
I already scanned my public ip, on my workstation I've got 15 open ports, when I scanned the public ip it only showed two open ports, seems that there are firewall configuration.

You should be able to match the open ports with the internal machines (assuming NAT/PAT is configured), if you access the router have a look at which services are forwarded internally. It is also possible that the router is blocking everything inbound and the 2 open ports are management services for the router, for example: HTTP and Telnet.
How about a verbose scan of those 2 open ports, what information can you gather?

14  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Web Applications / Re: vulnerability :SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported on: May 30, 2012, 04:49:00 AM
You should have a list of ciphers reported as having a key length of 56 bits or 112 bits or less from the Nessus scan, and you could focus on addressing just those ciphers. The following Microsoft KB article describes how to disable the various weak ciphers: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/245030
There are many other references to disabling weak cipher keys on IIS 6, for example: http://www.waynezim.com/2011/03/how-to-disable-weak-ssl-protocols-and-ciphers-in-iis/ which also describes using a tool called SSLScan to test the ciphers easily.

HTH
15  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Web Applications / Re: vulnerability :SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported on: May 29, 2012, 03:34:08 PM
What webservers are running on the other hosts that are reported as vulnerable, are the results for webservers or other devices?
Are all the webservers running IIS?
Are you saying that after following the suggestions on the website above, the servers are still being reported as vulnerable?
What details are reported for the vulnerability in Nessus, is the following message the same: http://www.nessus.org/plugins/index.php?view=single&id=42873 ?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 11
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.093 seconds with 21 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.