|
EH-Net
|
|
February 10, 2012, 06:16:08 AM
|
Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 12
|
|
1
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Incident Response / Sony hack reveals password security is even worse than feared
|
on: June 08, 2011, 06:33:12 AM
|
From The Register: Sony hack reveals password security is even worse than fearedA million Sony users' password/username IDs and 250,000 Gawker login credentials, each stored in plain text, were exposed via separate hacks. Four in five of the passwords in the 37,608 account sample from the Sony hack actually only occurred once. But users are independently making poor passwords choices, Hunt reports. Around 36 per cent of the passwords used appeared in a password dictionary, a factor that would leave them wide open to brute-forcing attacks in instances where the same passwords were used and only a password hash database was exposed by a hack. Hunt reckons more than four in five (82 per cent) of the passwords would have fallen to a basic rainbow table crack. Maybe it is just me but I think the fact that two companies, who should be using adequate security controls, stored passwords in plain text is a much more important trend then identifying that internet users use insecure passwords on sites without sensitive data. I mean really the researcher says that 82% of the passwords would fall to a basic rainbow attack, except that the reality of the situation is the hackers didn't have to use a rainbow attack because the companies didn't bother to hash the passwords. Anyway /rant.
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Resources / Career Central / Re: Got busted...
|
on: April 01, 2011, 02:00:38 PM
|
I think you are right hayabusa. Although, it does show he was last online today. That could just mean he got a few last hours of gaming in before he got busted.  Let's hope it isn't true.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Other / Re: Unhackable Sweden Server(WiKileaks)
|
on: December 02, 2010, 04:22:06 PM
|
|
Usually "Bulletproof" hosting doesn't indicate a high level of security protections in use to prevent hacking. What the company means by that term is that they will use the legal protections of the hosting country (in this case Sweden) and will not give into pressure from "outside" influences (US Government in this case) to remove the offending hosted content. Its basically a promise from the hosting company that they won't remove your content no matter who you piss off. A lot of unethical ISPs offer similar hosting services usually at a high price to criminal enterprises.
I haven't researched PRQ's security policies so I don't know if they are more stringent then usual but I doubt it. If anyone with enough resources really wanted to "down" Wikileaks using a hack it could be done easily I am sure.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / CEH - Certified Ethical Hacker / Re: CEH question
|
on: June 23, 2010, 01:07:49 PM
|
|
I agree the question is very misleading. On first reading it I agreed with BillV but after a thorough reading I think Hordakk is right and the correct answer is Bastion Host. Since the question doesn't really say it is designed to lure in attackers (although that could be implied in the "fully exposed" statement).
However having said that I know BillV is heavily involved with EC-Council and the CEH. I would probably take his answer as more in line with EC-Council thinking. After all, as anyone who has taken the CISSP will agree with me, it isn't always the right answer it is the answer they want.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / GPEN - GIAC Certified Penetration Tester / Re: GPEN Practice Exam
|
on: June 22, 2010, 10:15:11 AM
|
With a 90% on the practice test you should be good to go on the actual exam. I have found that the GIAC practice tests are a very good representation of what you can expect from the actual exam. On the tests I have taken so far I scored with in a percentage point or two of my last practice test. I do agree with BillV that the actual test is harder but I don't think it is harder content as much as it is additional pressure because it is "for real". If you are still a bit concerned I would recommend reading and taking with you Ed Skoudis's "Counter Hack Reloaded". Ed wrote the GPEN course and this book is a great resource for anyone wanting to take the test. Good Luck on the test!
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Features / Opinions / Re: real hackers....
|
on: March 25, 2010, 12:38:14 PM
|
I copied this from somewhere. I can't remember where sorry if I am stepping on some ones IP. Enjoy!! You know you're a computer security professional when:
You not only lock your laptop with a physical cable leash, but you change the combination of the lock when it's not in use so that it can't be "compromised".
Although you have no ill intent, you spend no small amount of your downtime in airports thinking of ways to circumvent TSA security -- and you've come up with several can't-miss terrorist ideas that even Jack Bauer couldn't stop.
You lock your screensaver with twice as much insistence when security friends are around than when strangers are, because you're not nearly as worried about a stranger's intentions.
You're immediately discontent with all newly announced security solutions, even before you know anything beyond the name.
Having extralong passwords that you must type over and over again to get correct is not a bother.
You have a database program to store all your passwords, but even it doesn't contain a single, decoded password.
When you read industry-mandated security guidelines, you chuckle at all the newbie mistakes.
You secretly hope you don't miss a big virus outbreak while you are out on vacation.
Any security book you read is covered in pen from the technical corrections you've made.
Your Internet browser home page is a computer security news bundling Web site.
You've so fine-tuned your personal computer's host-based firewall that you are sure it is causing problems with legitimate programs, but you really don't care.
You fantasize about a job where you could bust into the house of unsuspecting malicious hackers and take them away to jail.
You've got a new car with a built-in GPS and computer, but you are constantly worried about how easy it would be to hack.
You suspect that every banner and Flash ad on every Web site is hosting malicious JavaScript.
You loath government interference with the Internet because you know they will only mess it up more and not fix the problem (see CAN-SPAM Act).
When you hear that we've arrested some big spammer, you have the same nonreaction as when you hear we've arrested Al-Qaeda's No. 2 person ... again.
You resist every new application install because of the new attack vector opportunities it will bring.
You know that mobile small-form-factor computers have almost no security.
Your cell phone is password-protected.
You resent having to give out your Social Security number to any person or company, especially because you have never given it when dealing with the Social Security administration.
You already own or covet one of those special screen covers that prevent people on either side of you of from reading your screen.
You can't prevent yourself from laughing out loud when someone announces they think that computer viruses, buffer overflows, or whatever will be solved in five years.
You hate upgrading your computer because it means spending days trying to copy and convert all your cool hacker and anti-hacker tools to the new system.
You have solid friends on computer security discussion lists, whom you know would be there for you in a life-crisis pinch but that you've never met in person or talked to on the phone.
Although you never try to shoulder surf other people's passwords, you can always tell by sound alone when they haven't typed one that is eight characters or more, and you chuckle inside.
When someone hands you their USB key to copy something, you always decline, and instead offer your known, clean USB key. You would also prefer one-time, disposable, Tupperware-like memory drives if they existed.
You always slow down when reading security guidance looking for the words "should," "must," "never," and "always" -- and you understand their importance.
By the time you read a CERT security bulletin, you've known about the issue for several days.
You always investigate SSL certificate errors when they come up in your browser.
Finally, you know you're a computer security person when you have so frequently spoken passionately to complete strangers about computer security and the frustration it entails that you know what it's like to be covered in sweat -- and the listening party to have a look on their face that says they didn't know what they were in for.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Difficulty of reverse engineering
|
on: February 04, 2010, 03:38:42 PM
|
|
First off I have to caveat this advice with the statement that I am a Reverse Engineering newbie. I would say based on what you want accomplished "keeping someone from replacing the algorithm" and the complexity of the code in question that successful reverse engineering would depend mostly on your implementation. Is this algorithm code going to be part of the main program executable or a separate file? If it is included in the main exe and fully integrated into your program honestly very few people are ever going to be able to replace that algorithm by reverse engineering. I am sure some experts would be able to but it would require significantly altering the flow of the executable using assembly code. Now on the other hand if you put the algorithm in a separate file using a debugger it would be fairly easy to trace the program flow and change algorithms. Of course it makes it a lot harder for you to ever upgrade your algorithm if you integrate it into your main executable.
Well that's my two cents. Good Luck!
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Wireless / Re: hacking wireless network at school...help!
|
on: September 21, 2009, 01:33:44 PM
|
|
Wow you can get to a hacker website but can't access your porn talk about crappy admins. Here is what I would do. Find a buddy who lives close to school. Pay to hook up an Internet connection to their house and drop a WAP. Charge all your buddies in school a weekly access fee to access unfiltered wireless Internet. Rotate the key weekly (this keeps down the natural tendency in a school for the key to get passed around). Simple! Make money, access uncensored Internet, be legal, and well MOSTLY ethical. This probably violates a few school rules so expect to be slapped down hard by THE MAN but at least you won't get jail time for hacking a government computer system.
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|