|
EH-Net
|
|
May 25, 2013, 01:07:04 AM
|
Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
|
2
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Forensics / Re: Using dd cmd to copy drive.
|
on: May 20, 2010, 11:27:35 AM
|
|
The dd command is not what you need in this instance. dd is used for making exact images of drives or partitions. The if= switch takes a FILE as its argument. This is typically the file Linux associates with a partition or drive, such as /dev/hda1. It sounds like you're trying to copy data over a network. If you just want to copy data, why not use cp? If you need to keep files synchronized over a network share, lookup rsync.
If you are trying to make an image of a drive to use for forensic purposes, your current setup simply won't work for this purpose. Simply by mounting a drive you could make change to it which makes your image invalid. If the drive is in Windows, then shared, then mounted in Linux, then copied... this isn't how you do forensics, so I'm going to assume that's not what you're trying to do.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Resources / Tools / Re: OpenDLP - data loss prevention tool
|
on: May 11, 2010, 02:46:26 PM
|
... but I'd rather pay to sleep at the end of the day.
You mean if I pay somebody else to support their own product, I don't have to always know everything about everything 24/7/365? Somebody should tell my boss this.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Pentesting Server
|
on: May 11, 2010, 09:31:25 AM
|
|
sil does have a good point. You really don't want to mess with production servers unless you really know what you're doing. I'm assuming from the description so far that this is a small business, so they are probably more likely to let someone fiddle with things simply because they don't know better. However, if something does go wrong, even if it wasn't your fault, say someone else ( a real malicious user), gets into the system, steals some info, loads a virus, or whatever. I'd say there's a pretty good chance you could take the blame whether it's your fault or not. We're just trying to watch your back here. It's real easy for people starting out to start fiddling with things and find themselves up a creek full of fecal matter without an adequate means of propulsion. So, at the very least, get written permission and some kind of liability release so they can't come after you if something goes wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Pentesting Server
|
on: May 10, 2010, 11:39:08 AM
|
|
First of all, I'm going to assume you're doing this with permission, otherwise you're in the wrong place. Secondly, you said they "wouldnt be so happy if any services went down...". Sounds like you shouldn't be playing with this server even with permission. Setup a test server if you're just trying to learn. You shouldn't be learning on live in-production servers. Nothing good can come from it. Maybe you can clone the system, or use some P2V tools to create a virtual copy of it? Then you can be as aggressive as you want without worrying about shutting anything down, and you won't crash anything unknowingly and thus bring down the wrath of your employer.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Hacking Contest by OffSec
|
on: May 10, 2010, 07:40:19 AM
|
|
It was fun, but totally kicked my butt too. Never got past phase 1. I didn't get much time besides Saturday morning and a little while Saturday evening to spend on it, though I did spend all weekend thinking about it. Now I know I need to focus some study on exploiting web apps. On another note, I managed to get through the Google Code Jam qualification round, so the weekend wasn't a total loss!
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|