|
EH-Net
|
|
May 20, 2013, 08:06:15 PM
|
Show Posts
|
|
Pages: 1 ... 27 28 [29]
|
|
422
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Hardware / Re: Hardware Firewall Purchase
|
on: September 28, 2010, 09:22:20 PM
|
|
Fortinet support was so bad at our last job, our CISO rewrote the kernel for them. They had one really neat feature patch that removed the GUI for the MAC/IP binding tab (DHCP reservations) which was joyous for all our Windows centric GUI lovin sysadmins that had to then use the CLI. Some feature. We had somewhere in the neighborhood of 500 or so units, mostly wifi60's and 60s that got upgraded to 100a's and a few 400's and 800s and some high end units at HQ that I never saw. (I worked primarily in the field with peripheral duties managing those boxes at the sites - roughly 60 in my region) I had a 100a as my gateway box with a persistent vpn to HQ in my house for the last 2 or 3 years I was at that employer. That tunnel bounced more than any other platform I've used. Maybe they are better now, I wouldn't know. I use Juniper these days.
|
|
|
|
|
423
|
Resources / Tutorials / Re: Having trouble understanding W3AF Pen-Test Results
|
on: September 28, 2010, 09:03:45 PM
|
|
I'm not trying to be mean, but the log you posted is really not that cryptic. I've never used w3af in my life and those results seem pretty clear to me. This is the problem with running automated scanners without understanding what it is you're testing and what the potential issues are, as well as a basic understanding of the technologies underlying the environment. I would recommend just going line by line and doing research on any areas or technologies that you don't understand. If research gives you heartburn, I'd select another profession.
Also keep in mind that much of this output is enumerating information about the target, it's just informational. It's useful info that you can leverage into further attacks or more refined scanning, but its not necessarily a laundry list of vulns either. That's where tester expertise and judgement comes into play, and determining what your next step is given the information returned from the scan. There is no silver bullet, either in the tools you are choosing to use or an approach to compromise a target.
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
Ethical Hacking Discussions and Related Certifications / Security / Re: New SANS course - SEC660
|
on: September 16, 2010, 04:25:28 PM
|
|
I'll be applying to facilitate this course in Orlando next year just as soon as they post details for the conference. 660 looks absolutely phenomenal and slightly intimidating coming from Stephen Sims. That guy is a mutant. (but in a good yet scary way) I did 560 as a facilitator in 2009 with a guy from DOD and Ed as instructor and had a blast. I highly recommend the SANS volunteer program and would go that route again even if work was willing to pay for the whole course. Conference + 4 months of ondemand + certification attempt + some of the best networking opportunities with the most amazing minds in security for 800.00? Yes please. Just be prepared for 10-12 hour work days and you'll probably have to stay in the conference hotel. (more money but still worth it)
|
|
|
|
|
Loading...
|